From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.221.50 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793158302; b=OFD6qwndWfWooIPjXMqANCExoVZ4AmA9PlXqGd94xTq0OfZsJgNzJVqmFo6814U+5Yyl dMPeOZ8fBlcyzZ63W1YXvbWZ9IH2NQFtl2PYTxK9hK81LyhdrU74ZKJFjN0BV7MjbeBk/ DG3dd7VaQMkzzbfnqN+26jrYdM17xysAlmqzeKxMUmJT1QnwBKFcTO0INU5o3rWGwv0ef vz5+LZ95Oy0BSCsXK0uhE1kKv3AvPvgzwvpxQtOQFvRwDqqyW2mxP0uS5jJgQvJ/hfPsD OOg8JsffaevY3cZjeR/rNtHzgCtfQy82lHO/7hIx3fxyyutloQ1EmqBBmeFUFVN7s3Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793158302; h=DMARC-Filter:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Google-DKIM-Signature: X-Forwarded-Encrypted:X-Gm-Message-State:X-Gm-Gg:X-Received:Received: From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:X-Mailer:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=pAM/k5pso5Rh97rJEUAxgzfJJtw2xRFXFv7FuWc2YG8=; b=O2UMpOpaEelP82RYEQ+eV5nHqT2rOy8o3r3OcUBpI0WGExmZ/3ki6u5Zkq0e6ttV3pqD jkCyaCZRZ/MxMwcw2GJ4x1tuJc8ONFShGXgvO00aHz8oCBCr+AYw8HBLUEbCNWQ9ZkDeX sBLzuREH1ZYkVBlDrbI87o+RL5DZFVxRDaFYb3qfLsXgA9LXIh/ITZr78LLHCnfwDVKH4 i7JXlce1Iv+zZ3hje7fs07SLwrRRMqQADhiwQTS30zc/nzFO+p6+r5DBeboiyOnSl18Hh XeZVOaUGHxwGMWaVpNcrEcLnt/w4t7k0Tw+nPru0jxk9LvtUIr6o7QOHnkqCCe6YtYg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20260707 header.b=TKtjJ26A; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.221.50 Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com (mail-wr1-f50.google.com [209.85.221.50]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22188606A31A for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2026 03:31:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 22188606A31A Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20260707 header.b=TKtjJ26A Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-48e47347279so331258f8f.1 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2026 20:31:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20260707; t=1793158300; x=1793763100; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=pAM/k5pso5Rh97rJEUAxgzfJJtw2xRFXFv7FuWc2YG8=; b=TKtjJ26AyrOIvKgM9gSHFzJVttQbAz7K1tgJp45DycwwDWK02uZU6yUuN5GwZynQ2B ae0frFGOWjd309EoPcVd5OgqfbszpyuiYp5YrQrQG70TRaTJmHZC2TK8Z/FbQ7nptU32 EcuTWSVYgfBHwyhMfr6qwDHMO9yMpAGpb1USH8bRFoIFUhF8aFBuDidcxuuU7/D2JMJs DdlXYlVBr1mCxKadUP++/8uDXOaWn4yyxoWoC6coD6uBtOFgSUfCOIBlTZdnTJ/geT/7 Uy4dBpgUnPpx7rU6540gzKpyiG+bcPgbcYfUqiL3thAuUeGv8n054uxHYrnTHF1BhVGU CbyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1793158300; x=1793763100; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=pAM/k5pso5Rh97rJEUAxgzfJJtw2xRFXFv7FuWc2YG8=; b=BK379Re+Z5DdMZETSQ/JVKXCw21HZWutTBIfK0SYGL/dtgkP9u6kQ82dFWSsQ/6ilv 1PEnXHa0HH6CBOI2zO7M4FBg7pf+51dvE+Qch4wkKwclT6BfYHyVefadinN+vJjjsCSh gNzdO3vLSiVR37Yk86oQ99H44MAsyas2TzY3U47/bbYKVS/0xVHKbppH2hTOmoCTKNuk +x/Oviq2ujVFq+lPMpqcdmpzjZCCNJEGl7X24ofI3GkuVWd2kkd9XaV2/sR766yWY915 O4cW9gZ8PMSXZmXGijciGSzsRlZSZamlg1CLx67cvg6W9Z33L97HUdViZq1u7EQzmmRs 4bFg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBzbZuOkOUw9Fwdz55mWOpLtV5B9gzRBXgVdj3n1Vdhvm7w8i3fAtT/wZwK9eveHUZOO0jm6Cl+PRJlq7t8=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYIBzkRwRIZPWaA0WB8S2g8s+Vp2Up90OZZUapR/xSgc05EZgqKb mdHKpDpt8nGkyx5/HvJZjIygpMJnhPaMRO3CWYK/anEKQGfnbZZWJB0D X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou2sGQFhSaLIl6jQs4VNUQ/3XU4O/dZo9+vR3yZ7Skwi0zqfgnEJS/DRzwHY4Bj C0DaWelSnW2u3t4tZfMB6r2rAHPsYnlXq6Kxbt7FO5bp3KwSt/7+zyBooH7RjwEDBilHVXeKQ4N eHgqjIAPUnWRw2bWGzI4Wig+/7m6JaQ/6VHAKv5WzEMoDRo6dIRfGZPK5VFJpUQLE4GiB5y9Q8z KRhDvzMdFtII5iHHPsWqvK7lrgilP1zMviXWd35ajK+ot9vXzDoTZ1INFKO9Gge4fPUEdZxuR/9 n27KRpD4Xr3huoVyDvOmG6gE4dwno2jBaIawjqSHTJ2NQvFjWK7SiDuidjlLGuPQaq3ENXxYbVN zRQBBvLGPC9wdfS1RKhrx40wqjWAth4PMBB/XMxbtiaBMkEq2tDLdcxZ/Umo/CFdVctzFtVadGm 2/pB3FZlecmxpQvqnMe9CIul0PcOMU4WOyt3J28X0bBWevZl3qc1OITSKK6h/0QyWy3MKD65xjF pQvrG36PJQgnYll8iUm6uNChx4hKCPoj1runRM0R08C0MZLYuSO/6SMVeuxR3r7l4tr0oFUqTE+ CsEUVpEwzyyjSaFbquQDGrSCqPpbvjzO+Cg9yGxf1CMblo2S+n2Us0coTEAsuBPFjOyT3yv35MV 65ziy+Um2fa+wJT47bPggHXUpdx14Yz1UO8xKuZTQI0DxgEiNOYn281Gd0abE3W7jQzpEKydLQH IZwPeb0oG5T9p4hNmgyeoiZSBWSN1kZOO6BWQYvHkHCSmzLVBL4xuSdg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e011:0:10b0:487:930:8acc with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-48e5d5c275bmr1961357f8f.16.1793158300262; Tue, 27 Oct 2026 20:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (dynamic-2a02-3100-a45b-7d01-5035-b393-698f-53f0.310.pool.telefonica.de. [2a02:3100:a45b:7d01:5035:b393:698f:53f0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-48e3ecdfd8dsm24290569f8f.56.2026.10.27.20.31.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Oct 2026 20:31:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Karl Mehltretter To: Steven Rostedt , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Karl Mehltretter , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , Frederic Weisbecker , "Paul E. McKenney" , Boqun Feng , Waiman Long , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Valentin Schneider , K Prateek Nayak , Hongyan Xia , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Randy Dunlap , Andrew Morton , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] entry: Classify very early hardirq entry and return-tail callbacks Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 04:31:14 +0100 Message-Id: <20261028033127.82193-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 (Apple Git-154) X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Tracing still needs a transition recursion allowance because a callback can run after architectural hardirq entry but before generic entry updates preempt_count(). Steven asked whether HARDIRQ_OFFSET could be installed early enough for those callbacks to observe hardirq context. This RFC implements that contract for arm64. arm64 must first distinguish ordinary interrupts from pseudo-NMIs. For an ordinary interrupt, stage the raw preempt-count addition and establish lockdep state immediately after that decision and before instrumentable entry work. Keep time, tick, RCU and IRQ accounting at the existing generic boundary. With DEBUG_PREEMPT and without separate reschedule bits, an already-negative count preserves the legacy DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON() oops short circuit, attempts deferred reporting at the instrumentable finish, and skips post-add bookkeeping and the matching subtraction when rejected. The exit side has a second gap. Keep any applied hardirq count and lockdep classification through traceable generic exit work, then remove them before a possible schedule. Carry ordinary-hardirq provenance through that schedule in a compact three-state byte, keeping irqentry_state_t two bytes wide, and restore a classification-only tail around architecture tracing, deferred hrtimer work, IRQ-on preparation and context-tracking preparation. The tail does not repeat RCU, tick or IRQ accounting. This is a design RFC, not a merge-ready proposal. The questions are: - Should generic entry expose separate raw-update and bookkeeping phases? - Are preempt-count and lockdep state sufficient for the return tail? - Is arm64 a suitable first user of this contract? The series is based on d135ab453a74 ("Merge tag 'backlight-next-7.4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/backlight"). Patches 1 and 2 include two arm64 noinstr inlining prerequisites so the series applies directly to mainline: - "arm64: Always inline raw preempt count updates" provenance: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c3a90368dd6c096af9d918e036a27728696fb8a4.1786603168.git.hongyan.xia@transsion.com/ - "arm64: percpu: Annotate __kern_my_cpu_offset() as '__always_inline'" provenance: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260918161407.2300-12-will@kernel.org The first is the relevant hunk extracted from Hongyan Xia's larger posted RFC. The second is a current-mainline rebase of Will Deacon's posted patch. They preserve the authorship and links of the original submissions. Repository: https://github.com/kmehltretter82/linux prerequisites: steve-early-hardirq-arm64-prereqs-v2-20261027 8bdce63fa17d generic core: steve-early-hardirq-core-v2-folded-20261027 8651af55ecbc arm64 RFC: steve-early-hardirq-arm64-rfc-v2-folded-20261027 56016d197e1b The transition recursion slots remain unchanged. A separate recursion-lifetime series keeps the task recursion bit inside one preemption-disabled interval. A development-only patch removed the slots for a matched experiment. Neither that removal nor the lifetime series is part of this RFC. All three kernels in the experiment contained this early-hardirq series. On a native 16-vCPU Google Axion system, matched arm64 debug kernels completed 100 deterministic ftrace callback and IPI overlaps per cell: done litmus mixed collisions Slots kept, lifetime fix 100/100 0 0 0 Slots removed, no fix 100/100 33 60 13 Slots removed, lifetime 100/100 0 0 0 The litmus and mixed columns count ftrace recursion records. The collisions column counts transition-sensitive scheduler and return-tail records. Complete dmesg captures were clean in all three cells. The second cell is a counterexample to removing the slots without the lifetime fix in the tested path. The third supports the combined design on this machine. It does not establish every architecture-specific early-entry interval, so this RFC retains the slots and keeps the lifetime work separate. Before this rebase, the patch-identical tree was validated across a nine-cell cross-architecture W=1 full-link matrix: RISC-V 64, i386, powerpc64le, arm64, x86-64 and ARM32 with GCC 13.3 and Clang/LLD 18.1.3. It also passed 600-second arm64 SMP8 and RISC-V SMP14 stress gates, a RISC-V AIA/IMSIC SMP1/SMP2/SMP8 gate under QEMU 11.1.50, and a focused four-row DEBUG_PREEMPT staged-add oops oracle with 403 of 403 locking selftests. An ARM64 PREEMPT_RT SMP4 build passed targeted return-tail tasklet and forced-thread timer closure tests, three SMP2 priority-masked pseudo-NMI return runs, and an SMP1 NO_HZ_IDLE and RCU_EQS_DEBUG return gate with 386 Startirq-to-Endirq intervals and 1,229 IRQ-disable/enable pairs. All patches remain unchanged according to git range-diff after the rebase. Changes since v1: - rebase onto d135ab453a74 and include the two arm64 noinstr inlining prerequisites as patches 1 and 2 so the series applies directly to mainline - keep the recursion-lifetime change in a separate series - carry a scoped hardirq-entry cookie across staged count updates so !HAS_SEPARATE_PREEMPT_RESCHED_BITS && DEBUG_PREEMPT configurations preserve the legacy DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON() oops decision and skip post-add work and teardown when rejected - encode ordinary-hardirq provenance and staged-count application in a three-state byte so irqentry_state_t remains two bytes wide - fully initialize the arm64 EL1 debug entry state before provenance is added - retain irqentry_exit_pcpu_adjust() ordering across the return tail - accept and test nonzero nested lockdep hardirq depth in the tail - add a matched native test of the separate recursion-lifetime work and - tighten the contract and documentation wording v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261022051654.79224-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com/ Assisted-by: LLM Hongyan Xia (1): arm64: Always inline raw preempt count updates Karl Mehltretter (11): sched: Split preempt-count bookkeeping from raw updates lockdep: Use raw access for pinned hardirq state entry: Add the pre-counted ordinary-hardirq entry/exit contract entry: Skip inactive IRQ-return reschedule calls context_tracking: Split IRQ-exit preparation from the EQS transition lockdep: Prepare IRQ-on state from a hardirq return tail entry: Carry ordinary-hardirq provenance through kernel return entry: Classify ordinary hardirq return-tail work as hardirq context arm64: Use the pre-counted hardirq lifecycle Documentation: entry: Describe the pre-counted hardirq lifecycle locking/selftest: Exercise hardirq return-tail preparation Will Deacon (1): arm64: percpu: Annotate __kern_my_cpu_offset() as '__always_inline' Documentation/core-api/entry.rst | 89 +++++++++++-- arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h | 2 +- arch/arm64/include/asm/preempt.h | 6 +- arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 34 +++-- include/linux/context_tracking_irq.h | 32 ++++- include/linux/hardirq.h | 33 +++++ include/linux/interrupt.h | 2 +- include/linux/irq-entry-common.h | 130 +++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/irqentry_hardirq.h | 81 ++++++++++++ include/linux/irqflags.h | 14 ++- kernel/context_tracking.c | 78 +++++++++--- kernel/entry/common.c | 45 ++++++- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 49 +++++--- kernel/sched/core.c | 101 +++++++++++++-- kernel/softirq.c | 181 +++++++++++++++++++++++---- lib/locking-selftest.c | 53 ++++++++ 16 files changed, 828 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/linux/irqentry_hardirq.h base-commit: d135ab453a7400a34930bdda1ef4bdc8acfac80e -- 2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)