From: Qing Wang <wangqing7171@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Davi Chaves Azevedo <davichazbh@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qing Wang <wangqing7171@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] sched/fair: Replace random newidle_balance with Bresenham accumulator
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 11:44:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261028034449.2368071-1-wangqing7171@gmail.com> (raw)
The current NI_RANDOM implementation uses a random dice roll to allow
newidle_balance attempts according to the success rate. There is a better
way to implement it.
Replace the random dice with a Bresenham accumulator that distributes the
allowed attempts uniformly across a 1024-step window:
Each step does the following:
- Accumulate (1 + newidle_ratio) into newidle_window_pos.
- If the accumulator reaches 1024, allow the balance attempt and
subtract 1024.
This guarantees exactly (1 + newidle_ratio) newidle_balance operations per
1024 steps, uniformly spaced for any ratio in [0, 1023].
Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Qing Wang <wangqing7171@gmail.com>
---
v2:
Removed sched_rnd_state and sched_rng() since they are no longer used.
v3:
Corrected the code comments.
Performance testing results from Prateek using tbench
(most sensitive workload for newidle balance):
Clients: tip bresenham_accm
1 321.65 (0.00 pct) 313.97 (-2.38 pct)
2 641.92 (0.00 pct) 638.74 (-0.49 pct)
4 1245.65 (0.00 pct) 1237.26 (-0.67 pct)
8 2435.80 (0.00 pct) 2442.23 ( 0.26 pct)
16 4717.66 (0.00 pct) 4688.19 (-0.62 pct)
32 9303.53 (0.00 pct) 9390.71 ( 0.93 pct)
64 18002.57 (0.00 pct) 17911.56 (-0.50 pct)
128 27729.26 (0.00 pct) 27621.95 (-0.38 pct)
256 47134.77 (0.00 pct) 46137.36 (-2.11 pct)
512 43179.41 (0.00 pct) 43277.53 ( 0.22 pct)
1024 40339.30 (0.00 pct) 40176.49 (-0.40 pct)
The %diff is within the noise range, indicating no performance regression.
include/linux/sched/topology.h | 1 +
kernel/sched/core.c | 3 ---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
kernel/sched/sched.h | 6 ------
kernel/sched/topology.c | 1 +
5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
index f96812d71c51..e951d6f3fb0d 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ struct sched_domain {
unsigned int newidle_call;
unsigned int newidle_success;
unsigned int newidle_ratio;
+ unsigned int newidle_window_pos;
u64 newidle_stamp;
u64 max_newidle_lb_cost;
unsigned long last_decay_max_lb_cost;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 1754d9f95f2c..4d764e68897c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -128,7 +128,6 @@ EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_dl_server_start_tp);
EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_dl_server_stop_tp);
DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq, runqueues);
-DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rnd_state, sched_rnd_state);
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(__sched_proxy_exec);
@@ -8927,8 +8926,6 @@ void __init sched_init_smp(void)
{
sched_init_numa(NUMA_NO_NODE);
- prandom_init_once(&sched_rnd_state);
-
/*
* There's no userspace yet to cause hotplug operations; hence all the
* CPU masks are stable and all blatant races in the below code cannot
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 0f2364479f9d..172c4b53c11a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -14198,6 +14198,7 @@ static inline void update_newidle_stats(struct sched_domain *sd, unsigned int su
ratio += sd->newidle_success;
sd->newidle_ratio = min(1024, ratio);
+ sd->newidle_window_pos = 0;
sd->newidle_call /= 2;
sd->newidle_success /= 2;
}
@@ -14928,16 +14929,24 @@ static int sched_balance_newidle(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
if (sched_feat(NI_RANDOM) && sd->newidle_ratio < 1024) {
/*
- * Throw a 1k sided dice; and only run
- * newidle_balance according to the success
- * rate.
+ * Bresenham's line algorithm based accumulator
+ *
+ * At each invocation, the ratio is added to an
+ * accumulator. A balance is triggered whenever
+ * the sum >= 1024.
+ *
+ * This guarantees exactly 'ratio' balance
+ * operations per 1024 calls, distributing them
+ * as uniformly as possible across the interval.
*/
- u32 d1k = sched_rng() % 1024;
weight = 1 + sd->newidle_ratio;
- if (d1k > weight) {
+
+ sd->newidle_window_pos += weight;
+ if (sd->newidle_window_pos < 1024) {
update_newidle_stats(sd, 0);
continue;
}
+ sd->newidle_window_pos -= 1024;
weight = (1024 + weight/2) / weight;
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 4c25fbe84fb5..210aa35b5720 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1424,12 +1424,6 @@ static inline bool is_migration_disabled(struct task_struct *p)
}
DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq, runqueues);
-DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct rnd_state, sched_rnd_state);
-
-static inline u32 sched_rng(void)
-{
- return prandom_u32_state(this_cpu_ptr(&sched_rnd_state));
-}
static __always_inline struct rq *__this_rq(void)
{
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index 3dab0253976f..8cc5315a6945 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -1984,6 +1984,7 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
.newidle_call = 512,
.newidle_success = 256,
.newidle_ratio = 512,
+ .newidle_window_pos = 0,
.newidle_stamp = now,
.max_newidle_lb_cost = 0,
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 3:44 Qing Wang [this message]
2026-10-28 9:01 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-10-28 9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261028034449.2368071-1-wangqing7171@gmail.com \
--to=wangqing7171@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=davichazbh@gmail.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®