From: Rongzheng Wang <testwrzwrz@gmail.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Cc: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: cover AF_XDP multi-buffer TX software checksum
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 23:55:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261028155544.12908-1-testwrzwrz@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <auH2yISa8xouAx/3@boxer>
Hi Maciej,
Thanks for the review and for the Reviewed-by on 1/2.
> nit: breaking RCT - I know it's test but Stan payed attention to keeping
> the order...
Fixed in v4. The declaration block now follows the width order used in this
file:
struct xsk_tx_metadata *meta;
struct xdp_desc *tx_desc;
struct udphdr *udph;
struct ethhdr *eth;
struct iphdr *iph;
u16 first_len;
u16 pkt_len;
u8 pkt[256];
u32 offset;
void *data;
__u32 idx;
u32 addr;
int ret;
u32 i;
> would it be worth exercising this up to MAX_SKB_FRAGS ?
> then instead of having this flat layout you would loop over the desc
> count.
Good point. I changed it to loop over the descriptor count and exercise 1,
2, and MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 (18) frames. The extra frame is the linear head;
the remaining MAX_SKB_FRAGS frames are skb frags, matching the copy-mode
limit documented in af_xdp.rst. The last descriptor takes the remaining
length so the fragments cannot overrun pkt_len. The updated selftest passes.
I'll send v4 as a new thread.
Thanks,
Rongzheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 2:50 [PATCH net v3 0/2] xsk: fix " Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-28 2:50 ` [PATCH net v3 1/2] xsk: defer software checksum until the skb is complete Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-28 13:21 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-28 15:55 ` Rongzheng Wang [this message]
2026-10-28 15:57 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-28 2:50 ` [PATCH net v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: cover AF_XDP multi-buffer TX software checksum Rongzheng Wang
2026-10-28 13:20 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2026-10-28 16:38 ` Rongzheng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261028155544.12908-1-testwrzwrz@gmail.com \
--to=testwrzwrz@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®