From: Adrian Ambrozewicz <aambrozewicz@nvidia.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>, Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
Jia Jia <physicalmtea@gmail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/7] gpiolib: fix chip removal with lines still requested from user space
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 13:29:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261029-gpiolib-chip-removal-v4-0-aambrozewicz@nvidia.com> (raw)
Removing a GPIO chip while user space holds a line request, as when a
hot-pluggable GPIO controller goes away, leaks the line labels (patch 2)
and IRQ names (patch 5), frees IRQs a second time (patches 3, 7) and
lets a blocked read() stall the removal (patch 4). Patch 1 makes
gpiodev_release() wait for pending label frees; without it,
cleanup_srcu_struct() can warn, more often with patch 2.
Patch 7 changes gpiochip_remove() for in-kernel users too: their
remaining IRQs are freed after the chip pointer is cleared, when
gpiod_*() calls fail. Patch 6 drops edge events when the line read
fails, so an IRQ thread in that window does not report -ENODEV as
a rising edge.
User-visible change: a read() blocked when the chip is removed returns
the queued events, then fails with -ENODEV.
For stable: patch 2 needs 1; patches 3, 5 and 7 fix a 6.13 commit also
in 6.12.y; patch 7 needs 6; patch 4 applies to 6.12.y.
Tested under QEMU (x86_64, 4 vCPUs) with gpio-sim and a test chip on
the hierarchical irqchip, with lockdep, kmemleak and KASAN. An LLM
assistant helped with the analysis, reproducers and drafts, hence the
Assisted-by tags; I reviewed and tested every change.
Changes in v4:
- Rebased on gpio/for-current.
- New patch 6: drop edge events when a line read fails, before patch 7
frees the character device IRQs after gdev->chip is cleared (Sashiko).
- Patch 2: for_each_hwgpio() seeing a requested line with a NULL label
is on mainline's request path too; applied separately (Sashiko):
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261022083343.3905973-3-aambrozewicz@nvidia.com
- Patch 5: moving irq_label above irq in struct line moves the 4-byte
hole rather than removing it (Andy).
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261020-gpiolib-chip-removal-v3-0-aambrozewicz@nvidia.com
Changes in v3:
- Rebased on gpio/for-current; shorter commit messages (Kent, Bartosz).
- Patch 6 (now 7): return early when there is no ->to_irq(); drop the
lineevent_free() comment (Kent).
- Sashiko's v2 6/6 finding on gpiochip_setup_dev() is on mainline too;
I plan a separate fix on top of this series.
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261016-gpiolib-chip-removal-v2-0-aambrozewicz@nvidia.com
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261012-gpiolib-chip-removal-v1-0-aambrozewicz@nvidia.com
Adrian Ambrozewicz (7):
gpiolib: wait for pending label frees before cleaning up desc_srcu
gpiolib: free the label of lines released after their chip was removed
gpiolib: cdev: do not free line IRQs again after the chip is removed
gpiolib: cdev: don't sleep in the SRCU read section in read()
gpiolib: cdev: don't leak the IRQ name when the chip is removed
gpiolib: cdev: don't report a failed line read as an edge
gpiolib: let the character device free its IRQs first on chip removal
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 38 +++++++--
2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
base-commit: baa14758afb3e2828de1f76511edc1de50216f39
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 11:29 Adrian Ambrozewicz [this message]
2026-10-29 11:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] gpiolib: wait for pending label frees before cleaning up desc_srcu Adrian Ambrozewicz
2026-10-29 11:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] gpiolib: free the label of lines released after their chip was removed Adrian Ambrozewicz
2026-10-29 11:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] gpiolib: cdev: do not free line IRQs again after the chip is removed Adrian Ambrozewicz
2026-10-29 11:29 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] gpiolib: cdev: don't sleep in the SRCU read section in read() Adrian Ambrozewicz
2026-10-29 11:29 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] gpiolib: cdev: don't leak the IRQ name when the chip is removed Adrian Ambrozewicz
2026-10-29 11:29 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] gpiolib: cdev: don't report a failed line read as an edge Adrian Ambrozewicz
2026-10-30 11:14 ` Kent Gibson
2026-10-30 12:31 ` Adrian Ambrozewicz
2026-10-30 13:46 ` Kent Gibson
2026-10-29 11:29 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] gpiolib: let the character device free its IRQs first on chip removal Adrian Ambrozewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261029-gpiolib-chip-removal-v4-0-aambrozewicz@nvidia.com \
--to=aambrozewicz@nvidia.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=physicalmtea@gmail.com \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®