From: Francesco Valla <francesco@valla.it>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Haixu Cui <quic_haixcui@quicinc.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowangio@gmail.com>
Cc: "Viresh Kumar" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Mathieu Poirier" <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Francesco Valla" <francesco@valla.it>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] Add devicetree bindings and maintainer for spi-virtio
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 17:27:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261029-spi-virtio-bindings-v3-0-ef30217abefd@valla.it> (raw)
When a virtio transport exposes a non-discoverable bus, the devicetree
can be used to declare its child devices (if any) and/or other
properties. To allow for that, the virtio framework searches for a node
with a suitable compatible in virtio_device_of_init() when registering
a device [1]; such compatible takes the form "virtio,deviceXX", where
XX is the hexadecimal representation of the virtio device ID as defined
by the virtio specification.
This patchset thus does not introduce a new functionality, but allows
proper validation of nodes tied to spi-virtio devices, aligning SPI to
what is already being done for e.g. I2C and GPIO virtio devices.
It was sent initially as part of a different patchset [2], but since it
complements a functionality that is de-facto already there and is useful
beyond that specific use case it was sent separately (also following the
maintainer's feedback there to separate it from remoteproc-specific
changes).
This was tested both with virtio-mmio using qemu-system-aarch64 and with
remoteproc-virtio with a Zephyr backend (with relevant remoteproc-virtio
parts still not upstreamed - see [2]).
On top of that, I added myself as maintainer for the spi-virtio driver,
since the former maintainer's e-mail bounces back and its owner (Haixu
Cui) did not update it after changing employment.
Thank you!
Regards,
Francesco
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.2.8/source/drivers/virtio/virtio.c#L488
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-remoteproc/20260916-remoteproc_virtio_map-v1-0-dac8c5eb4aa9@valla.it/
Signed-off-by: Francesco Valla <francesco@valla.it>
---
Changes in v3:
- Add Francesco as Maintainer of the spi-virtio driver (instead of
Reviewer) as replacement for the former maintainer (Haixu Cui).
- Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20261027-spi-virtio-bindings-v2-0-67927b24b9d4@valla.it
Changes in v2:
- Expanded the commit message to better explain the functionality and
the chosen compatible.
- Redundant pieces dropped from bindings.
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260929-spi-virtio-bindings-v1-0-6a0eef3213b3@valla.it
---
Francesco Valla (2):
dt-bindings: spi: add spi-virtio
MAINTAINERS: replace spi-virtio maintainer
.../devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-virtio.yaml | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++
MAINTAINERS | 3 +-
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
base-commit: d135ab453a7400a34930bdda1ef4bdc8acfac80e
change-id: 20260927-spi-virtio-bindings-f4e350b2709a
Best regards,
--
Francesco Valla <francesco@valla.it>
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 16:27 Francesco Valla [this message]
2026-10-29 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: spi: add spi-virtio Francesco Valla
2026-10-29 16:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] MAINTAINERS: replace spi-virtio maintainer Francesco Valla
2026-10-29 19:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-30 4:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Add devicetree bindings and maintainer for spi-virtio Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261029-spi-virtio-bindings-v3-0-ef30217abefd@valla.it \
--to=francesco@valla.it \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowangio@gmail.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_haixcui@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®