mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daejun Park via B4 Relay <devnull+daejun7.park.samsung.com@kernel.org>
To: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	 Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>,
	Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>,
	 Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	 Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>,
	Sergey Bashirov <sergeybashirov@gmail.com>,
	 Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@kernel.org>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org,  Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 5/9] xfs: cap the block count of xfs_iomap_write_direct() at one extent
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 11:23:02 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261029-xfs-pnfs-batch-v5-5-ef8d2eafb7fa@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029-xfs-pnfs-batch-v5-0-ef8d2eafb7fa@samsung.com>

From: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>

xfs_iomap_write_direct() reserves blocks for the whole count in an
unsigned int. For a pNFS layout the client chooses that count, and an
RW LAYOUTGET for 16 TiB wraps the reservation and shuts XFS down.

xfs_bmapi_write() maps at most XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN blocks here, so cap
the count at that. nfsd asks again for the rest. The other callers get
the same mapping as before.

Suggested-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261008154017.GO2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261015060932.GD14035@lst.de
Suggested-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/atoImJxtg70XcIjS@quentin
Fixes: 527851124d10 ("xfs: implement pNFS export operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
---
Tested with pynfs on a 32 GiB XFS: the 16 TiB RW LAYOUTGET shut XFS
down before, and gets NFS4ERR_NOSPC after with XFS still running.
Like one for 100 GiB, which allocated nothing before, it now leaves
about 24 GiB allocated past EOF.
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
index 99d48081c5..c3465204b8 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
@@ -285,6 +285,14 @@ xfs_iomap_write_direct(
 
 	ASSERT(count_fsb > 0);
 
+	/*
+	 * xfs_bmapi_write() maps at most XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN blocks in one
+	 * mapping, so don't reserve blocks for more. A pNFS layout range
+	 * comes from a client, and its block count may not even fit the
+	 * 32-bit reservation. The caller maps the rest with a later call.
+	 */
+	count_fsb = min_t(xfs_filblks_t, count_fsb, XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN);
+
 	resaligned = xfs_aligned_fsb_count(offset_fsb, count_fsb,
 					   xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip));
 	if (unlikely(XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip))) {

-- 
2.43.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-29  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-29  2:22 [PATCH v5 0/9] xfs: pNFS block layout fixes Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-29  2:22 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] xfs: mark the inode preallocated for pNFS write layouts past EOF Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-29  2:22 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] xfs: add a flag to convert unwritten extents without allocating blocks Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-29  2:23 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] xfs: refuse a pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT of a range without blocks Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-29  2:23 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] xfs: clamp a pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT extent before computing its end Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-29  2:23 ` Daejun Park via B4 Relay [this message]
2026-10-29  2:23 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] xfs: clamp the pNFS layout range to the maximum file size Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-29  2:23 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] xfs: take the invalidate lock while mapping a pNFS layout Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-29  2:23 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] xfs: add datasync and log_flushed arguments to xfs_log_force_inode() Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-29  2:23 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] xfs: make pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT stable the way fdatasync does Daejun Park via B4 Relay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261029-xfs-pnfs-batch-v5-5-ef8d2eafb7fa@samsung.com \
    --to=devnull+daejun7.park.samsung.com@kernel.org \
    --cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=aalbersh@kernel.org \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=dgc@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    --cc=sergeybashirov@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®