From: Zhao Li <enderaoelyther@gmail.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>
Cc: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: iwlegacy: unregister the LED if 3945 hardware registration fails
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 17:43:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261029094336.19250-2-enderaoelyther@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029081955.GA10212@wp.pl>
Hi Stanislaw,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 09:19:55AM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 10:23:28PM +0800, Zhao Li wrote:
> > il3945_setup_mac() registers the LED before the mac80211 hardware, but
> > its registration error path does not call il_leds_exit(). The analogous
> > 4965 failure releases the driver and reaches its existing remove cleanup.
>
> Could you explain exacly how this is fixed in 4965?
> I do not see this in the code.
There is no il_leds_exit() in the 4965 error path itself. The caller
handles it: il4965_mac_setup_register() runs from the firmware callback,
and a failure there unbinds the driver.
il4965_ucode_callback()
il4965_mac_setup_register() /* il_leds_init(), register_hw fails */
goto out_unbind
complete(&il->_4965.firmware_loading_complete)
device_release_driver(&il->pci_dev->dev)
il4965_pci_remove()
il_leds_exit(il)
...
ieee80211_free_hw(il->hw)
il4965_pci_probe() returns success after submitting the asynchronous
firmware request. If the callback reaches device_release_driver()
before probe finishes, the device lock serializes unbind with probe.
The callback completes firmware_loading_complete before unbinding,
and il4965_pci_remove() unregisters the LED regardless of
mac80211_registered.
3945 calls il3945_setup_mac() directly from il3945_pci_probe(), and the
probe error labels never call il_leds_exit(). ieee80211_free_hw() then
frees the il_priv that embeds il->led while the LED is still on
leds_list, so the next led_trigger_register() takes the trigger_lock of
a freed LED.
That should have been in the changelog. I'll send a v2 that spells out
the 4965 path; the code change stays the same.
Thanks,
Zhao
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 14:23 Zhao Li
2026-10-29 8:19 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2026-10-29 9:43 ` Zhao Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261029094336.19250-2-enderaoelyther@gmail.com \
--to=enderaoelyther@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stf_xl@wp.pl \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®