From: Yuqiang Sun <izaiahsun@gmail.com>
To: andersson@kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org
Cc: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: core: Do not put the device when device_add() fails
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 21:00:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261029130037.5505-1-izaiahsun@gmail.com> (raw)
When device_add() fails, rproc_add() calls put_device() and then
removes the character device. The reference it drops is the one
rproc_alloc() took with device_initialize(), which belongs to the
caller: after a failed rproc_add(), every driver frees the rproc,
either with rproc_free() or through devm_rproc_alloc(), and both drop
that reference again.
So the rproc is freed inside rproc_add(): by the put_device() itself,
or, with CONFIG_REMOTEPROC_CDEV, by the cdev_del() that follows, when
the character device drops its reference on the parent device. The
caller then uses the freed rproc and puts it a second time.
With one allocation failure injected into device_add() (failslab
restricted to rproc_add) while st_fdma probes, KASAN reports:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in slim_clk_disable+0x38/0xf4 [st_slim_rproc]
Read of size 8 by task insmod/69
Call trace:
slim_clk_disable
st_slim_rproc_alloc
st_fdma_probe
Freed by task 69:
kfree
rproc_type_release
device_release
kobject_put
cdev_default_release
kobject_put
cdev_del
rproc_char_device_remove
rproc_add
st_slim_rproc_alloc
followed by use-after-free reports in kobject_put() and
refcount_warn_saturate() from the rproc_free() in
st_slim_rproc_alloc().
Remove the put_device(): the caller's rproc_free() drops the reference
and releases the rproc, as it does for the other failures in
rproc_add().
The problem was found with kbound, a static analysis prototype that
checks whether callers rely on an object after a callee returns a value
for which the callee may have released it, on v7.2.12; it is present
in rproc-next.
Build-tested with x86_64 and arm64 allmodconfig (W=1, sparse): no new
warnings. Run-tested on QEMU's arm64 virt machine (TCG) with KASAN,
using a device tree node for an ST FDMA with a SLIM core, so that
st_fdma_probe() reaches rproc_add() without the hardware (no clocks,
MMIO windows only mapped), and failing each allocation in rproc_add()
in turn with failslab: before this patch every failure in device_add()
(9 of 9) gives the reports above; with it nothing is reported, and the
rproc is released once, by rproc_free(). Not tested on remoteproc
hardware.
Fixes: 7dbdb8bd7c02 ("remoteproc: core: Cleanup device in case of failure")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5-5 kbound
Signed-off-by: Yuqiang Sun <izaiahsun@gmail.com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index b88bf179507d..e4f44a3c8b4d 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -2309,10 +2309,8 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
return ret;
ret = device_add(dev);
- if (ret < 0) {
- put_device(dev);
+ if (ret < 0)
goto rproc_remove_cdev;
- }
dev_info(dev, "%s is available\n", rproc->name);
base-commit: 82d0bbd67c42a44f0e18b0b7b0da0f3ace0c9527
--
2.53.0
reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261029130037.5505-1-izaiahsun@gmail.com \
--to=izaiahsun@gmail.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®