From: Linkui Xiao <xiaolinkui@126.com>
To: jiri@resnulli.us, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linkui Xiao <xiaolinkui@kylinos.cn>
Subject: [PATCH net 0/2] devlink: do not dereference a missing param item or shared buffer
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 11:30:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261030033041.3679526-1-xiaolinkui@126.com> (raw)
From: Linkui Xiao <xiaolinkui@kylinos.cn>
Two devlink helpers look an object up by id or index, warn when the
lookup fails, and then pass the NULL result to code that dereferences
it. A driver mistake (a param_id that was never registered, an sb_index
that was never registered or is unregistered twice) therefore costs an
oops instead of a warning.
1/2 param: devl_param_value_changed() hands the missing param item to
devlink_param_notify() -> devlink_nl_param_fill(), whose first
statement dereferences param_item->param.
2/2 sb: devl_sb_unregister() runs list_del() on the missing shared
buffer; list is the first member of struct devlink_sb, so it
reads and writes through address 0.
In both cases every other user of the same lookup already returns right
after the warning, so the fixes just align the remaining callers; there
is no change of behavior beyond avoiding the dereference. The param side
follows the example Jiri set for devlink_param_unregister():
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126075838.1643665-5-jiri@resnulli.us/
Both Fixes: tags point at the commits that introduced the unguarded
WARN_ON pattern; the current devl_() functions are pure renames of those
originals. No in-tree caller triggers either path today (the audit is
part of a defensive hardening pass), so both are aimed at stopping
out-of-tree drivers from turning a driver bug into an oops.
Linkui Xiao (2):
devlink: param: do not dereference a missing param item
devlink: sb: do not dereference a missing shared buffer
net/devlink/param.c | 3 ++-
net/devlink/sb.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-30 3:30 Linkui Xiao [this message]
2026-10-30 3:33 Linkui Xiao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261030033041.3679526-1-xiaolinkui@126.com \
--to=xiaolinkui@126.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaolinkui@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®