From: Gyutae Bae <gyutae.opensource@navercorp.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Minsu Jeon <minsu.jeon@navercorp.com>,
Jonghyeon Kim <jong-hyeon.kim@navercorp.com>,
Siwan Kim <siwan.kim@navercorp.com>,
Gyutae Bae <gyutae.bae@navercorp.com>
Subject: Re: Backport request: Revert "softirq: Let ksoftirqd do its job" (d15121be7485)
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 13:42:28 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261030044228.7815-1-gyutae.opensource@navercorp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9024faed-854d-411d-96c1-7cefd4d68dc6@redhat.com>
On 10/29/26 09:33, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> IMHO such change should not land to stable lightly. It's a behavioural
> change with subtle side effects. The threaded napi feature is disabled
> by default for the same reason. Also the revert has some soft functional
> dependencies in napi threaded cleanup and improvements landed into v6.4,
> i.e. 6bb218b5a6e3f3c5e2e76faf8fc976f3f6f72496, likely more.
Thanks for taking a look. I understand the concern about changing
behavior in stable kernels.
Gyutae Bae
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 4:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 5:42 Gyutae Bae
2026-10-29 8:33 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-10-30 4:42 ` Gyutae Bae [this message]
2026-10-30 6:16 ` Jason Xing
2026-10-30 14:15 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261030044228.7815-1-gyutae.opensource@navercorp.com \
--to=gyutae.opensource@navercorp.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=gyutae.bae@navercorp.com \
--cc=jong-hyeon.kim@navercorp.com \
--cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minsu.jeon@navercorp.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=siwan.kim@navercorp.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®