From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Cao Ruichuang <create0818@163.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>,
Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kernel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tracing: Export live module tracepoint strings in printk_formats
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 17:30:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261030173049.6656d506@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178647423521.280401.10184675433127100074@163.com>
On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 18:15:13 +0000
Cao Ruichuang <create0818@163.com> wrote:
Hi Cao,
Sorry for the late reply, with AI bugs coming in, as well as travel and
conferences, I fell very behind in submitted patches.
> diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> index 7566815fa..d9ac1fd6e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/module.h
> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> @@ -513,7 +513,9 @@ struct module {
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_TRACING
> unsigned int num_trace_bprintk_fmt;
> + unsigned int num_tracepoint_strings;
> const char **trace_bprintk_fmt_start;
> + const char **tracepoint_strings_start;
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING
> struct trace_event_call **trace_events;
> diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> index e0d838c9c..2b973cc72 100644
> --- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> +++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> @@ -508,10 +508,10 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
> * the ASCII strings they represent.
> *
> * The @str used must be a constant string and persistent as it would not
> - * make sense to show a string that no longer exists. But it is still fine
> - * to be used with modules, because when modules are unloaded, if they
> - * had tracepoints, the ring buffers are cleared too. As long as the string
> - * does not change during the life of the module, it is fine to use
> + * make sense to show a string that no longer exists. For modules, the string
> + * mapping is exported while the module is loaded. When the module is unloaded,
> + * its trace buffers are cleared before the mapping is removed. As long as the
> + * string does not change during the life of the module, it is fine to use
> * tracepoint_string() within a module.
> */
> #define tracepoint_string(str) \
> diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
> index 46dd8d25a..cb0acb2ce 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/main.c
> +++ b/kernel/module/main.c
> @@ -2729,6 +2729,10 @@ static int find_module_sections(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
> mod->trace_bprintk_fmt_start = section_objs(info, "__trace_printk_fmt",
> sizeof(*mod->trace_bprintk_fmt_start),
> &mod->num_trace_bprintk_fmt);
> + mod->tracepoint_strings_start =
> + section_objs(info, "__tracepoint_str",
> + sizeof(*mod->tracepoint_strings_start),
> + &mod->num_tracepoint_strings);
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> /* sechdrs[0].sh_size is always zero */
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_printk.c b/kernel/trace/trace_printk.c
> index 98171a239..2aca8d206 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_printk.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_printk.c
> @@ -13,21 +13,29 @@
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
Please keep this in "upside-down x-mas tree" format. The order of headers
goes by the length of their names.
> #include <linux/ctype.h>
> #include <linux/list.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> #include "trace.h"
>
> +static int trace_bprintk_fmt_cnt;
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
>
> /*
> * modules trace_printk()'s formats are autosaved in struct trace_bprintk_fmt
> * which are queued on trace_bprintk_fmt_list.
> + *
> + * modules tracepoint_string() entries are kept as ranges into the owning
> + * module's __tracepoint_str section and are removed again when the module
> + * goes away.
> */
> static LIST_HEAD(trace_bprintk_fmt_list);
> +static LIST_HEAD(tracepoint_str_list);
>
> -/* serialize accesses to trace_bprintk_fmt_list */
> +/* serialize updates and printk_formats iteration of the module lists */
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(btrace_mutex);
>
> struct trace_bprintk_fmt {
> @@ -35,6 +43,14 @@ struct trace_bprintk_fmt {
> const char *fmt;
> };
>
> +struct tracepoint_mod_str {
> + struct list_head list;
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> + struct module *mod;
> + const char **start;
> + unsigned int num;
> +};
> +
> static inline struct trace_bprintk_fmt *lookup_format(const char *fmt)
> {
> struct trace_bprintk_fmt *pos;
> @@ -75,6 +91,7 @@ void hold_module_trace_bprintk_format(const char **start, const char **end)
> if (fmt) {
> list_add_tail(&tb_fmt->list, &trace_bprintk_fmt_list);
> tb_fmt->fmt = fmt;
> + trace_bprintk_fmt_cnt++;
> } else
> kfree(tb_fmt);
> }
> @@ -84,16 +101,63 @@ void hold_module_trace_bprintk_format(const char **start, const char **end)
> mutex_unlock(&btrace_mutex);
> }
>
> +static void hold_module_tracepoint_strings(struct module *mod)
> +{
> + struct tracepoint_mod_str *tp_str;
> +
> + if (!mod->num_tracepoint_strings)
> + return;
> +
> + tp_str = kmalloc_obj(*tp_str);
> + if (!tp_str)
> + return;
> +
> + tp_str->mod = mod;
> + tp_str->start = mod->tracepoint_strings_start;
> + tp_str->num = mod->num_tracepoint_strings;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&btrace_mutex);
> + list_add_tail_rcu(&tp_str->list, &tracepoint_str_list);
> +}
> +
> +static void release_module_tracepoint_strings(struct module *mod)
> +{
> + struct tracepoint_mod_str *tp_str;
> +
> + if (!mod->num_tracepoint_strings)
> + return;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&btrace_mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry(tp_str, &tracepoint_str_list, list) {
Please use list_for_each_entry_safe(). You are removing tp_str from the
list. Do not rely on internals of RCU to protect this. If the lock was a
spin lock, then it may have been safe (even though I would still ask for
this change). But because it is a mutex, this could be preempted, the RCU
grace period finish, the tp_str freed and then the loop will crash.
> + if (tp_str->mod != mod)
> + continue;
> +
> + list_del_rcu(&tp_str->list);
> + /* Module teardown waits for RCU before freeing the section. */
> + kfree_rcu(tp_str, rcu);
> + return;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static int module_trace_bprintk_format_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> unsigned long val, void *data)
> {
> struct module *mod = data;
> - if (mod->num_trace_bprintk_fmt) {
> - const char **start = mod->trace_bprintk_fmt_start;
> - const char **end = start + mod->num_trace_bprintk_fmt;
>
> - if (val == MODULE_STATE_COMING)
> + switch (val) {
> + case MODULE_STATE_COMING:
> + if (mod->num_trace_bprintk_fmt) {
> + const char **start = mod->trace_bprintk_fmt_start;
> + const char **end = start + mod->num_trace_bprintk_fmt;
> +
> hold_module_trace_bprintk_format(start, end);
> + }
> + hold_module_tracepoint_strings(mod);
> + break;
> + case MODULE_STATE_GOING:
> + /* Trace event teardown runs first and clears module event buffers. */
> + release_module_tracepoint_strings(mod);
> + break;
> }
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> }
> @@ -119,7 +183,7 @@ static int module_trace_bprintk_format_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> * next format in the list.
> */
> static const char **
> -find_next_mod_format(int start_index, void *v, const char **fmt, loff_t *pos)
> +find_next_mod_format(loff_t start_index, void *v, const char **fmt, loff_t *pos)
> {
> struct trace_bprintk_fmt *mod_fmt;
>
> @@ -158,6 +222,42 @@ find_next_mod_format(int start_index, void *v, const char **fmt, loff_t *pos)
> return &mod_fmt->fmt;
> }
>
> +static const char **
> +find_next_mod_tracepoint_str(loff_t start_index, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> + struct tracepoint_mod_str *tp_str;
> + loff_t offset = *pos - start_index;
> +
> + if (offset < 0)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(tp_str, &tracepoint_str_list, list) {
> + if (offset < (loff_t)tp_str->num)
> + return tp_str->start + offset;
> +
> + offset -= tp_str->num;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static bool is_module_tracepoint_string(const char *str)
> +{
> + struct tracepoint_mod_str *tp_str;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + /* The tracepoint printk path can call this with IRQs disabled. */
> + guard(rcu)();
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(tp_str, &tracepoint_str_list, list) {
> + for (i = 0; i < tp_str->num; i++) {
> + if (str == tp_str->start[i])
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static void format_mod_start(void)
> {
> mutex_lock(&btrace_mutex);
> @@ -176,10 +276,21 @@ module_trace_bprintk_format_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> }
> static inline const char **
> -find_next_mod_format(int start_index, void *v, const char **fmt, loff_t *pos)
> +find_next_mod_format(loff_t start_index, void *v, const char **fmt, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline const char **
> +find_next_mod_tracepoint_str(loff_t start_index, loff_t *pos)
> {
> return NULL;
> }
> +
> +static inline bool is_module_tracepoint_string(const char *str)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> static inline void format_mod_start(void) { }
> static inline void format_mod_stop(void) { }
> #endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
> @@ -194,6 +305,7 @@ void trace_printk_control(bool enabled)
> __initdata_or_module static
> struct notifier_block module_trace_bprintk_format_nb = {
> .notifier_call = module_trace_bprintk_format_notify,
> + .priority = 0, /* lower than the trace event notifier */
> };
>
> __printf(2, 3)
> @@ -259,14 +371,14 @@ bool trace_is_tracepoint_string(const char *str)
> if (str == *ptr)
> return true;
> }
> - return false;
> + return is_module_tracepoint_string(str);
> }
>
> static const char **find_next(void *v, loff_t *pos)
> {
> const char **fmt = v;
> - int start_index;
> - int last_index;
> + loff_t start_index;
> + loff_t last_index;
>
> start_index = __stop___trace_bprintk_fmt - __start___trace_bprintk_fmt;
>
> @@ -292,7 +404,11 @@ static const char **find_next(void *v, loff_t *pos)
> return __start___tracepoint_str + (*pos - last_index);
>
> start_index += last_index;
> - return find_next_mod_format(start_index, v, fmt, pos);
> + if (*pos - start_index < trace_bprintk_fmt_cnt)
> + return find_next_mod_format(start_index, v, fmt, pos);
> +
> + start_index += trace_bprintk_fmt_cnt;
> + return find_next_mod_tracepoint_str(start_index, pos);
> }
>
> static void *
> diff --git a/samples/trace_printk/trace-printk.c b/samples/trace_printk/trace-printk.c
> index cfc159580..54c709c82 100644
> --- a/samples/trace_printk/trace-printk.c
> +++ b/samples/trace_printk/trace-printk.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/kthread.h>
> #include <linux/irq_work.h>
> +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
>
> /* Must not be static to force gcc to consider these non constant */
> char *trace_printk_test_global_str =
> @@ -31,6 +32,9 @@ static int __init trace_printk_init(void)
> {
> init_irq_work(&irqwork, trace_printk_irq_work);
>
> + (void)tracepoint_string("tracepoint_string_test_module_string_1");
> + (void)tracepoint_string("tracepoint_string_test_module_string_2");
Actually this shouldn't be in trace_printk() as that's not how it would be
used. Please add it to samples. Something like this:
diff --git a/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c b/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c
index ca5d98c360cb..e00630c2d922 100644
--- a/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c
+++ b/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ static void do_simple_thread_func(int cnt, const char *fmt, ...)
trace_foo_with_template_print("I have to be different", cnt);
trace_foo_rel_loc("Hello __rel_loc", cnt, bitmask, current->cpus_ptr);
+
+ trace_foo_tracepoint_str(tracepoint_string("tracepoint_string_test_module_string_1"));
+ trace_foo_tracepoint_str(tracepoint_string("tracepoint_string_test_module_string_2"));
+
}
static void simple_thread_func(int cnt)
diff --git a/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.h b/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.h
index 816848a456a2..48bca97086b6 100644
--- a/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.h
+++ b/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.h
@@ -623,6 +623,23 @@ TRACE_EVENT(foo_timer_fn,
TP_printk("name=%s count=%d", __get_str(name), __entry->count)
);
+
+TRACE_EVENT(foo_tracepoint_str,
+
+ TP_PROTO(const char *str),
+
+ TP_ARGS(str),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field( const char *, str )
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __entry->str = str;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("str=%s", __entry->str)
+);
#endif
/***** NOTICE! The #if protection ends here. *****/
> +
> trace_printk("This is a static string that will use trace_bputs\n");
> trace_printk(trace_printk_test_global_str);
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/trace_printk.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/trace_printk.tc
> index b02550b42..d66a8134c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/trace_printk.tc
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/event/trace_printk.tc
> @@ -23,5 +23,10 @@ grep -q ": (irq) .* trace_printk" trace
>
> grep -q "This is a %s that will use trace_bprintk" printk_formats
> grep -q "(irq) This is a static string that will use trace_bputs" printk_formats
> +grep -q "tracepoint_string_test_module_string_1" printk_formats
> +grep -q "tracepoint_string_test_module_string_2" printk_formats
>
> rmmod trace-printk ||:
> +
> +! grep -q "tracepoint_string_test_module_string_1" printk_formats
> +! grep -q "tracepoint_string_test_module_string_2" printk_formats
You would need different test that relies on the trace event sample code
and do this test there.
>
> base-commit: d5b201ed4feb7a11da242a97669424efeb724031
Thanks,
-- Steve
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-06 17:09 [PATCH] tracing: preserve module tracepoint strings Cao Ruichuang
2026-04-08 20:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-04-09 12:37 ` Petr Pavlu
2026-04-10 5:18 ` [PATCH v2] " Cao Ruichuang
2026-04-13 9:40 ` Petr Pavlu
2026-04-13 12:33 ` [PATCH] tracing: separate module tracepoint strings from trace_printk formats Cao Ruichuang
2026-04-14 11:37 ` Petr Pavlu
2026-04-16 8:03 ` Cao Ruichuang
2026-04-20 6:19 ` [PATCH v2] tracing: export live module tracepoint strings in printk_formats Cao Ruichuang
2026-04-28 12:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-08-11 18:15 ` [PATCH v3] tracing: Export " Cao Ruichuang
2026-09-08 5:18 ` Cao Ruichuang
2026-10-30 21:30 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261030173049.6656d506@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=create0818@163.com \
--cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=petr.pavlu@suse.com \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®