From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
GONG Ruiqi <gongruiqi@huaweicloud.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] slub_kunit: Add a test for the slab_buckets boot parameter
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 21:22:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202610302117.74D1EB1@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47c0b11109203640122a9b5b030d3f41bfbac609.1793253633.git.chris@chrisdown.name>
On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 02:08:44PM +0800, Chris Down wrote:
> Check that memdup_user() allocates from the memdup_user buckets by
> default, and from the regular kmalloc caches when they're turned off
> with slab_buckets=0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
> ---
> lib/tests/slub_kunit.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/slab.h | 4 ++++
> mm/slab_common.c | 4 +++-
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/tests/slub_kunit.c b/lib/tests/slub_kunit.c
> index e3b63f0338d5..670645875b27 100644
> --- a/lib/tests/slub_kunit.c
> +++ b/lib/tests/slub_kunit.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> #include <linux/kprobes.h>
> +#include <linux/mman.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> #include "../mm/slab.h"
>
> static struct kunit_resource resource;
> @@ -296,6 +298,41 @@ static void test_krealloc_redzone_zeroing(struct kunit *test)
> kmem_cache_destroy(s);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SLAB_BUCKETS
Please don't ifdef to drop a test. If you have to do any ifdef, use it
for test skipping instead.
> +static void test_slab_buckets(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + unsigned long user_addr;
> + const char *name;
> + void *p;
> +
> + if (!slab_buckets_enabled)
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, kmem_buckets_create("TestSlub_buckets",
> + 0, 0, INT_MAX, NULL));
> +
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMU))
> + kunit_skip(test, "userspace allocation needs an MMU");
> +
> + user_addr = kunit_vm_mmap(test, NULL, 0, PAGE_SIZE,
> + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> + MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, 0);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NE_MSG(test, user_addr, 0, "Could not create userspace mm");
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG(test, user_addr, (unsigned long)TASK_SIZE,
> + "Failed to allocate user memory");
> +
> + p = memdup_user((void __user *)user_addr, 64);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, p);
> +
> + name = virt_to_slab(p)->slab_cache->name;
> + if (slab_buckets_enabled)
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE_MSG(test, strstarts(name, "memdup_user-"),
> + "allocated from %s", name);
> + else
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE_MSG(test, strstarts(name, "kmalloc-"),
> + "allocated from %s", name);
> + kfree(p);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> #if defined(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) || (defined(CONFIG_KPROBES) && defined(CONFIG_SMP))
> #define NR_ITERATIONS 1000
> #define NR_OBJECTS 1000
> @@ -489,6 +526,9 @@ static struct kunit_case test_cases[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(test_kfree_rcu_wq_destroy),
> KUNIT_CASE(test_leak_destroy),
> KUNIT_CASE(test_krealloc_redzone_zeroing),
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SLAB_BUCKETS
> + KUNIT_CASE(test_slab_buckets),
> +#endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
> KUNIT_CASE_SLOW(test_kmalloc_nolock_and_friends_perf),
> #endif
> @@ -505,5 +545,6 @@ static struct kunit_suite test_suite = {
> };
> kunit_test_suite(test_suite);
>
> +MODULE_IMPORT_NS("EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Kunit tests for slub allocator");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
> index e94ac63d10dc..b5b344d6e402 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.h
> +++ b/mm/slab.h
> @@ -390,6 +390,10 @@ extern struct list_head slab_caches;
> /* The slab cache that manages slab cache information */
> extern struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache;
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT)
> +extern bool slab_buckets_enabled;
> +#endif
This feels messy. Any reason not to just export it entirely and avoid
all the ifdefness?
> +
> /* A table of kmalloc cache names and sizes */
> extern const struct kmalloc_info_struct {
> const char *name[NR_KMALLOC_TYPES];
> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> index b7a46c368ab1..9fe48da12010 100644
> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
> #include <linux/stackdepot.h>
> #include <trace/events/rcu.h>
> +#include <kunit/visibility.h>
>
> #include "../kernel/rcu/rcu.h"
> #include "internal.h"
> @@ -410,7 +411,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kmem_cache_create_args);
>
> static struct kmem_cache *kmem_buckets_cache __ro_after_init;
>
> -static bool slab_buckets_enabled __ro_after_init = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLAB_BUCKETS);
> +VISIBLE_IF_KUNIT bool slab_buckets_enabled __ro_after_init = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLAB_BUCKETS);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(slab_buckets_enabled);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SLAB_BUCKETS
> static int __init setup_slab_buckets(char *str)
> --
> 2.54.0
>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-31 4:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 6:07 [PATCH v2 0/6] mm/slab: Support selecting slab hardening features at boot Chris Down
2026-10-29 6:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] mm/slab: Enable SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED by default Chris Down
2026-10-31 4:13 ` Kees Cook
2026-10-29 6:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] mm/slab: Enable SLAB_FREELIST_RANDOM " Chris Down
2026-10-31 4:15 ` Kees Cook
2026-10-29 6:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] mm/slab: Support disabling SLAB_BUCKETS at boot Chris Down
2026-10-31 4:17 ` Kees Cook
2026-10-29 6:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] slub_kunit: Add a test for the slab_buckets boot parameter Chris Down
2026-10-31 4:22 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2026-10-29 6:09 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] mm/slab: Support disabling KMALLOC_PARTITION_CACHES at boot Chris Down
2026-10-31 4:28 ` Kees Cook
2026-10-29 6:09 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] slub_kunit: Add a test for the kmalloc_partition boot parameter Chris Down
2026-10-31 4:29 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202610302117.74D1EB1@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=gongruiqi@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®