Re: [PATCH 6.1 0000/1879] 6.1.191-rc2 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 11:16:41AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 10/29/26 00:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.191 release.
> > There are 1879 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 31 Oct 2026 07:28:30 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.191-rc2.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> There is a problem with the SCMI fixes that have been back ported:
> scmi_device_request_notifier()'s REQUEST/UNREQUEST cases are empty and
> scmi_probe() never calls scmi_device_create() for DT protocol nodes, so no
> SCMI protocol devices get created and clock consumers defer forever.
> 
> We are missing ee5dcedaf72d ("firmware: arm_scmi: Introduce a new lifecycle
> for protocol devices"), with that one cherry picking cleanly, the boards
> work as expected.

Now queued up, thanks!

greg k-h