mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf/core: Prevent duplicate sigtrap task work enqueue
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2026 11:45:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261031114520.642476-1-wutengda@huaweicloud.com> (raw)

The sigtrap handling in __perf_event_overflow() checks
event->pending_work before calling task_work_add(), but only sets
pending_work after the task work has been queued.

This leaves a window where an NMI can interrupt task_work_add()
and re-enter __perf_event_overflow() for the same event. Since
pending_work is still zero, the nested invocation can enqueue
the same pending_task again.

The re-entrant call path is:

  __perf_event_overflow()
    task_work_add()
      kasan_record_aux_stack()
        <NMI>
          __perf_event_overflow()
            task_work_add()

The nested invocation can enqueue pending_task before the
outer invocation does. When the outer invocation resumes, it
inserts the same task_work entry again, potentially creating
a cycle in the task work list.

This causes perf_pending_task() to be executed repeatedly
and leads to unbalanced event reference counting.

Use cmpxchg() to atomically claim pending_work before calling
task_work_add(). This ensures that only one invocation can
enqueue the pending_task, even when interrupted by an NMI.

If task_work_add() fails, clear the pending_work claim so that
a subsequent overflow can retry.

Also use READ_ONCE() when checking pending_work in the
exclude_kernel warning path to avoid an unsynchronized read.

Fixes: c5d93d23a260 ("perf: Enqueue SIGTRAP always via task_work.")
Signed-off-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 457d75ea7142..f1e4e153c49a 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -10925,16 +10925,18 @@ static int __perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event,
 
 		notify_mode = in_nmi() ? TWA_NMI_CURRENT : TWA_RESUME;
 
-		if (!event->pending_work &&
-		    !task_work_add(current, &event->pending_task, notify_mode)) {
-			event->pending_work = pending_id;
-			local_inc(&event->ctx->nr_no_switch_fast);
-			WARN_ON_ONCE(!atomic_long_inc_not_zero(&event->refcount));
-
-			event->pending_addr = 0;
-			if (valid_sample && (data->sample_flags & PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR))
-				event->pending_addr = data->addr;
-
+		if (cmpxchg(&event->pending_work, 0, pending_id) == 0) {
+			if (!task_work_add(current, &event->pending_task, notify_mode)) {
+				event->pending_work = pending_id;
+				local_inc(&event->ctx->nr_no_switch_fast);
+				WARN_ON_ONCE(!atomic_long_inc_not_zero(&event->refcount));
+
+				event->pending_addr = 0;
+				if (valid_sample && (data->sample_flags & PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR))
+					event->pending_addr = data->addr;
+			} else {
+				cmpxchg(&event->pending_work, pending_id, 0);
+			}
 		} else if (event->attr.exclude_kernel && valid_sample) {
 			/*
 			 * Should not be able to return to user space without
@@ -10948,7 +10950,7 @@ static int __perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event,
 			 *     To approximate progress (with false negatives),
 			 *     check 32-bit hash of the current IP.
 			 */
-			WARN_ON_ONCE(event->pending_work != pending_id);
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(READ_ONCE(event->pending_work) != pending_id);
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2026-10-31 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-31 11:45 Tengda Wu [this message]
2026-11-02 16:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-11-03  1:21   ` Tengda Wu
2026-11-05  3:56 ` Tengda Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261031114520.642476-1-wutengda@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=wutengda@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®