From: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@kernel.org>
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@kernel.org>,
David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] counter: ti-eqep: Fix runtime PM error handling in probe
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2026 12:45:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261031164551.3637340-1-wbg@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922032146.321006-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 10:21:46AM +0700, phucduc.bui@gmail.com wrote:
> From: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync() errors were not checked, and if
> devm_clk_get_enabled() failed afterwards, the function returned without
> calling pm_runtime_put_sync()/pm_runtime_disable(), leaking the runtime PM
> usage count.
>
> Switch to pm_runtime_resume_and_get() and add proper error unwinding via
> goto labels so every failure path after pm_runtime_enable() is cleaned up
> correctly.
>
> Fixes: f213729f6796 ("counter: new TI eQEP driver")
> Signed-off-by: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Hello,
This patch looks similar to another we're considering for ti-eqep.[^1]
Perhaps you can provide a review or comment in that discussion thread so
we can address this issue together.
William Breathitt Gray
[^1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260529095834.2561-1-sozdayvek@gmail.com/
> ---
> drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c b/drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c
> index 0dda3f2b14c7..698a9920f20d 100644
> --- a/drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c
> +++ b/drivers/counter/ti-eqep.c
> @@ -544,20 +544,31 @@ static int ti_eqep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> * domain.
> */
> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> - pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> + err = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + dev_err_probe(dev, err, "failed to enable runtime PM\n");
> + goto err_runtime_disable;
> + }
>
> clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, NULL);
> - if (IS_ERR(clk))
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(clk), "failed to enable clock\n");
> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(clk);
> + dev_err_probe(dev, err, "failed to enable clock\n");
> + goto err_runtime_put;
> + }
>
> err = counter_add(counter);
> - if (err < 0) {
> - pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> - pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> - return err;
> - }
> + if (err < 0)
> + goto err_runtime_put;
>
> return 0;
> +
> +err_runtime_put:
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> +err_runtime_disable:
> + pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> +
> + return err;
> }
>
> static void ti_eqep_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> --
> 2.43.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-31 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 3:21 phucduc.bui
2026-10-31 16:45 ` William Breathitt Gray [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261031164551.3637340-1-wbg@kernel.org \
--to=wbg@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=david@lechnology.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®