mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cheng Yongkang <teel4res@gmail.com>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>,
	Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Cheng Yongkang <teel4res@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] btrfs: reject refs=0 subvolume without DEAD in SUBVOL_SYNC_WAIT
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2026 23:25:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261101062539.1744605-1-teel4res@gmail.com> (raw)

btrfs_ioctl_subvol_sync() assumes that a cached root with zero
references has BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD set, and asserts that before
waiting for the cleaner. Two states break the assumption:

- A corrupt ROOT_ITEM with zero references and a matching orphan item,
  on a writable filesystem.
- A failed subvolume deletion. btrfs_delete_subvolume() zeroes the
  root references, aborts the transaction, which forces the filesystem
  read-only, and then clears DEAD again. No on-disk metadata is
  corrupted in this case.

With CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT=y, both reach a BUG().

Before waiting for a deleted subvolume, return -EROFS if the
filesystem is read-only, since the cleaner does not drop dead roots
then. The check runs on every iteration, so it also stops a waiter
when the filesystem becomes read-only during the wait. Subvolume
deletion holds subvol_sem for writing across the abort and the DEAD
rollback, and each iteration takes it for reading before inspecting
the root, so the read-only state and the cleared flag are seen
together. On a writable filesystem, report a zero-reference root
without DEAD and return -EUCLEAN instead of asserting.

Subvolumes that were not deleted or do not exist still return -EEXIST
and -ENOENT, also on a read-only filesystem.

Tested on btrfs for-next with CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT=y. A deletion made
to fail by fault injection after the references are cleared hits the
assertion in SUBVOL_SYNC_WAIT without this change and gets -EROFS with
it. A waiter on a deleted subvolume now returns -EROFS when the
filesystem is remounted read-only, instead of waiting until it is
signalled.

Fixes: 6c83d153ed86 ("btrfs: add new ioctl to wait for cleaned subvolumes")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/dd97efe9-91ec-495b-b698-acff1447421c@gmx.com/
Signed-off-by: Cheng Yongkang <teel4res@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Return -EROFS on a read-only filesystem before waiting for a deleted
  subvolume (Qu).
- Use unlikely() for the inconsistent-root check (Qu).
- Describe the failed-delete case separately from corrupt metadata.
- Add the Fixes tag and Cc stable.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20261025180258.349175-1-teel4res@gmail.com/

Testing notes (btrfs for-next d1dca33127ef, KASAN):
- The fault-injection case reached the cleared-references state in 2
  of 4 attempts on each kernel. The other attempts aborted earlier, and
  both kernels returned -EEXIST.
- FOR_ONE, FOR_QUEUED, COUNT and PEEK return the same results with and
  without this change for live, missing and deleted subvolumes, on
  writable and read-only mounts.
- The -EUCLEAN branch was not exercised. A crafted image with a
  zero-reference root and no DEAD flag hits the assertion without this
  change, but remounting that image read-write stalls in a transaction
  commit with or without this change, before the filesystem becomes
  writable.

 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 9857d6a9d456..5a1f2edfd831 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -5166,8 +5166,14 @@ static int btrfs_ioctl_subvol_sync(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, void __user *a
 			return -ENOENT;
 
 		wait_for_deletion = true;
-		ASSERT(root_flags & BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD, "root_flags=0x%llx",
-		       root_flags);
+		if (unlikely(test_bit(BTRFS_FS_STATE_RO, &fs_info->fs_state)))
+			return -EROFS;
+		if (unlikely(!(root_flags & BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD))) {
+			btrfs_err(fs_info,
+				  "subvol %llu has refs 0 without DEAD flag",
+				  args.subvolid);
+			return -EUCLEAN;
+		}
 		sched_ret = schedule_timeout_interruptible(HZ);
 		/* Early wake up or error. */
 		if (sched_ret != 0)

base-commit: d1dca33127efacd86ac550aa86352f8ea9f29a5a
-- 
2.34.1

             reply	other threads:[~2026-11-01  6:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-01  6:25 Cheng Yongkang [this message]
2026-11-01  6:51 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-11-01  7:18   ` Qu Wenruo
2026-11-01  7:33     ` Cheng Yongkang
2026-11-01  8:27       ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261101062539.1744605-1-teel4res@gmail.com \
    --to=teel4res@gmail.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mason@kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®