From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kelvin Zhang <zhangxp1998@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/proc/task_mmu: check THP exclusivity for each subpage
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2026 11:02:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261101110247.95a03a5601f235ffb39c54c1@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c1b393a4b04bd94e4f1c7879ae04e1793eb0931.1793552446.git.zhangxp1998@gmail.com>
On Sun, 1 Nov 2026 09:01:00 -0800 Kelvin Zhang <zhangxp1998@gmail.com> wrote:
> A PMD-mapped THP can contain subpages with different mapcounts. For
> example, after fork(), the child can unmap only part of the THP. The
> parent retains its PMD mapping, while the remaining child mappings
> are PTE mappings.
>
> pagemap_pmd_range_thp() passes the same initial page to
> __folio_page_mapped_exclusively() for every pagemap entry. With
> CONFIG_PAGE_MAPCOUNT=y, this applies the first subpage's exclusivity
> to all entries, falsely setting or clearing PM_MMAP_EXCLUSIVE for
> subpages with different sharing.
>
> Pass page + idx to check the subpage corresponding to each entry, as
> was done before converting to __folio_page_mapped_exclusively(). The
> index already accounts for reads starting partway through the PMD.
> The conservative whole-folio check without CONFIG_PAGE_MAPCOUNT is
> unchanged.
Thanks.
I don't want to pick on you at all, but this is a classic changelog - I
see this pattern so often.
a) here's what the code does
b) here's why that's wrong
c) here's how I fixed it.
But that's missing a very important bullet point:
a) here's what the code does
b) here's why that's wrong
c) here's how this affects users
d) here's how I fixed it.
see? This omission is so common! And I might have sent one or two
emails asking people for the missing info.
For the missing c), how does this sound?
: With transparent huge pages, /proc/PID/pagemap can incorrectly
: report shared pages as exclusive, or vice versa, after fork() and
: partial unmapping. This can mislead memory-analysis and
: checkpoint/restore tools. Actual mappings and copy-on-write behavior
: are unaffected.
And now that we have our statement of userspace impact, busy non-mm
downstream readers of this patch can easily see why your proposed
cc:stable is justified.
Also, it would be helpful to show brief before-and-after excerpts from
/proc/PID/pagemap to help others understand the impact of the change.
But I don't think we need a v2 just for this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-01 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-01 17:01 Kelvin Zhang
2026-11-01 18:07 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-01 18:18 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-01 18:27 ` Kelvin Zhang
2026-11-01 19:02 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-11-02 7:01 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261101110247.95a03a5601f235ffb39c54c1@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangxp1998@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®