mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qihang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qihang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] xen/privcmd: fix double free when an irqfd is shut down twice
Date: Mon,  2 Nov 2026 00:31:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261101163107.55037-1-q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com> (raw)

irqfd_deactivate() takes the irqfd off irqfds_list and queues
irqfd_shutdown().  queue_work() is not a once-only gate: it refuses to
enqueue a work item only while WORK_STRUCT_PENDING is set, and
process_one_work() clears that bit before it calls the work function.  So
nothing records that the shutdown work has already been queued, and
nothing protects the window between the start of irqfd_shutdown() and the
kfree() at its end.

Two paths call irqfd_deactivate() for the same irqfd:

  - privcmd_irqfd_deassign(), from the PRIVCMD_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN ioctl;

  - irqfd_wakeup(), with EPOLLHUP set, when the last reference to the
    eventfd file goes away, which runs wake_up_poll(&ctx->wqh, EPOLLHUP)
    from eventfd_release().

irqfds_lock serialises the two calls, but it does not make the second one
a no-op, and eventfd_ctx_fdget() takes a reference to the eventfd_ctx,
not to the struct file, so the last fd can still be closed while the
ioctl is running:

  CPU0                                 CPU1

  eventfd_ctx_fdget()
  spin_lock(irqfds_lock)
  list_del_init(&kirqfd->list)
  queue_work(&kirqfd->shutdown)        close(fd)
                                         eventfd_release()
                                           wake_up_poll(EPOLLHUP)
                                         irqfd_wakeup()
                                         spin_lock(irqfds_lock)
                                         irqfd_deactivate() again

If the work item has already started by then, its pending bit has been
cleared and the second queue_work() succeeds.  irqfd_shutdown() then runs
twice, so eventfd_ctx_remove_wait_queue(), eventfd_ctx_put() and kfree()
each hit the same object a second time; and when the second queue_work()
lands after the irqfd has been freed, the workqueue list operations write
to freed memory.

virt/kvm/eventfd.c has the same two callers and has had this guard since
the original irqfd support (721eecbf4fe99): irqfd_wakeup() calls
irqfd_deactivate() only if irqfd_is_active().  The comment there explains
why that is enough: the other side deactivates the irqfd before it takes
it off the waitqueue, and irqfd_shutdown() needs the waitqueue lock,
which this callback holds, so the irqfd cannot be freed under it.

Do the same here.  list_del_init() leaves the list head empty and the
irqfd stays off the list until kfree(), so it serves as a one-way
"active" flag.  The test is in irqfd_deactivate() rather than in
irqfd_wakeup() because privcmd_irqfd_deassign() walks irqfds_list and can
therefore never reach an inactive irqfd; only the wakeup path can, and a
single test covers both callers.

Fixes: f8941e6c4c712 ("xen: privcmd: Add support for irqfd")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Qihang <q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/xen/privcmd.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/privcmd.c b/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
index 5e56fbc934478..221b31611343e 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
@@ -901,10 +901,25 @@ struct privcmd_kernel_irqfd {
 	poll_table pt;
 };
 
+static bool irqfd_is_active(struct privcmd_kernel_irqfd *kirqfd)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&irqfds_lock);
+
+	return !list_empty(&kirqfd->list);
+}
+
 static void irqfd_deactivate(struct privcmd_kernel_irqfd *kirqfd)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_held(&irqfds_lock);
 
+	/*
+	 * Both the deassign ioctl and the eventfd wakeup path can reach
+	 * this function.  list_del_init() marks the irqfd inactive, so
+	 * only the first caller may queue the shutdown work.
+	 */
+	if (!irqfd_is_active(kirqfd))
+		return;
+
 	list_del_init(&kirqfd->list);
 	queue_work(irqfd_cleanup_wq, &kirqfd->shutdown);
 }
-- 
2.54.0 (Apple Git-157)


             reply	other threads:[~2026-11-01 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-01 16:31 Qihang [this message]
2026-11-01 16:31 ` Qihang
2026-11-01 16:32 Qihang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261101163107.55037-1-q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com \
    --to=q.h.hack.winter@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®