From: xu.xin@linux.dev
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org
Cc: agordeev@linux.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com,
hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
svens@linux.ibm.com, ljs@kernel.org, liam@infradead.org,
vbabka@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, surenb@google.com,
mhocko@suse.com, mhiramat@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
james.clark@linaro.org, ziy@nvidia.com,
baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, nico.pache@linux.dev,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org,
lance.yang@linux.dev, usama.arif@linux.dev, kas@kernel.org,
xu.xin@linux.dev, chengming.zhou@linux.dev,
matthew.brost@intel.com, joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com,
byungchul@sk.com, gourry@gourry.net,
ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, apopple@nvidia.com,
riel@surriel.com, harry@kernel.org, jannh@google.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] mm/ksm: use per-VMA locking to reduce mmap_lock contention
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 21:24:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261102132416.300084-1-xu.xin@linux.dev> (raw)
From: Xu Xin <xu.xin@linux.dev>
KSM scans VM_MERGEABLE VMAs and currently protects each scan with
mmap_read_lock(). Per-VMA locking allows KSM to read-lock only the VMA
it is actually interested in, so that unrelated mmap()/munmap() activity
in the same mm no longer blocks ksmd.
This series is organized as follows:
Patch 1 removes an unused 'vma' member from struct folio_walk. It has
never been used since its introduction and is pure cleanup.
Patch 2 adds a 'walk_lock' member to struct folio_walk and extends
folio_walk_start() to assert the required locking mode. Existing
callers are converted to pass PGWALK_RDLOCK, so there is no functional
change. This prepares folio_walk_start() for callers that hold a
per-VMA read lock instead of mmap_read_lock(), which is needed by the
Patch 4. No functional change.
Patch 3 replaces the boolean 'lock_vma' argument of break_ksm() with a
KSM-local enum ksm_walk_lock and builds the mm_walk_ops on the stack,
so the function-pointer table stays const and there is no shared
mutable state. No functional change.
Patch 4 introduces find_mergeable_vma_locked(), which uses the
universal per-VMA locking helper vma_start_read_unlocked() to look up
and read-lock a VM_MERGEABLE VMA without taking mmap_read_lock(). All
KSM call sites that previously used find_mergeable_vma() under
mmap_read_lock() are converted to the new helper, and the locking in
get_mergeable_page() is switched to PGWALK_VMA_RDLOCK_VERIFY so that
folio_walk_start() can verify the per-VMA lock is held. Because ksmd
no longer holds mmap_read_lock() while walking, __ksm_exit() must also
write-lock every VMA (in addition to mmap_write_lock()) to keep
serializing against an in-flight ksmd walk before the page tables are
freed.
A microbenchmark was run to measure the time KSM takes to merge a
victim region under mmap_lock contention. Under interference from 4 churner
threads, the merge time of the per-VMA KSM-optimized kernel is
significantly reduced by 50%.
Changelog:
v2:
- Patch 1: rewrote the commit message to explain the introducing
commit, how the VMA is actually used, and the audit performed;
dropped the Fixes: tag.
- Patch 3:
* replaced the boolean 'lock_vma' with a KSM-local enum
ksm_walk_lock instead of exposing the internal enum page_walk_lock
as a parameter;
* build the mm_walk_ops on the stack rather than
mutating a global struct, so the function-pointer table stays const
and there is no shared mutable state; rewrote the commit message.
- Patch 4:
* Fixed a per-VMA read-lock leak in find_mergeable_vma_locked()
when the VMA is not mergeable;
made __ksm_exit() write-lock every VMA (vma_start_write()) in
addition to mmap_write_lock(), so that it still serializes against a
ksmd walk that holds only a per-VMA read lock.
Xu Xin (4):
mm/pagewalk: delete the unused member
mm: make folio_walk_start()'s locking asserts scalable
mm/ksm: make break_ksm() more scalable
ksm: add find_mergeable_vma_locked() to use per-VMA locking
arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 4 +-
include/linux/pagewalk.h | 2 +-
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 4 +-
mm/huge_memory.c | 4 +-
mm/ksm.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
mm/migrate.c | 8 ++-
mm/pagewalk.c | 10 +++-
mm/rmap.c | 4 +-
8 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-02 13:24 xu.xin [this message]
2026-11-02 13:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/pagewalk: delete the unused member xu.xin
2026-11-02 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: make folio_walk_start()'s locking asserts scalable xu.xin
2026-11-02 13:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/ksm: make break_ksm() more scalable xu.xin
2026-11-02 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ksm: add find_mergeable_vma_locked() to use per-VMA locking xu.xin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261102132416.300084-1-xu.xin@linux.dev \
--to=xu.xin@linux.dev \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®