mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Harry Yoo (Meta)" <harry@kernel.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	 Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
	 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,  Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
	 David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	 Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev,  Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH for-next-fixes v2 0/5] memcg,slab: kmalloc_nolock() fixes
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2026 14:47:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261103-kmalloc-nolock-fixes-v2-0-19167cfe4779@kernel.org> (raw)

This patchset fixes three kmalloc_nolock() bugs.

1. obj_cgroup_put() takes spinlocks in the release path when it drops
   the last reference, but it can be called from any context.

2. A spinlock may be taken in the following path and may lead
   to deadlock:

   kmalloc_nolock()
   -> slab_post_alloc_hook()
   -> memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook()
   -> memcg_alloc_abort_single().

3. irq_work_sync() is called without synchronization for rcuwait
   (on PREEMPT_RT or some architectures), potentially causing a
   hang.

Bug 1 was reported by lockdep, and bugs 2 [1] and 3 [2] were
reported by Sashiko.

Patch 1 only touches mm/memcontrol.c and no later patche depends on
it, so it can go through to the memcg tree.

Deferring obj_cgroup_release()
==============================

RFC v1 skipped the stock drain in __refill_obj_stock() when spinning is
not allowed. Making sure "obj_cgroup_put() is not called in a restricted
context that doesn't allow spinning." is easy to get wrong.

v2 makes obj_cgroup_release() safe in any context instead (as mentioned
in cover letter of the RFC v1). The release callback only queues the
objcg (llist_add() + irq_work_queue(), both NMI-safe) and the release
runs from irq_work.

This also fixes a performance regression in RFC v1 in a free-heavy
kmalloc_nolock() microbenchmark.

Changes in v2
=============

- Rebased onto the latest slab/for-next-fixes.

- Rebasing the series, writing patch 1 and 5, and verification was
  assisted by AI and carefully reviewed by Harry Yoo.

- Patch 1: replaced with the new approach described above.

- Patch 2:
  - Now introduces the allow_spin local variables itself
    (previously added by the old patch 1).
  - Addressed v1 review comments from Vlastimil (thanks!):
    - restored the blank lines.

- Patch 3 (new): call debug_locks and KCSAN checks in kfree_nolock()
  regardless of allow_spin, as they acquire a spinlock only when
  reporting a bug.

- Patch 5 (patch 4 in v1): Introduce a mutex for
  deferred_work_barrier() as it can no longer reuse slab_mutex. In v1
  the only caller was kmem_cache_destroy(). The barrier is now also
  called from kvfree_rcu_barrier() and friends, which are usable outside
  mm where slab_mutex is not visible. Dropped Vlastimil's Acked-by
  accordingly.

- Dropped the Cc: stable tags to avoid intrusive backports for unlikely
  issues in practice [3].

- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20260624-kmalloc-nolock-fixes-v1-0-fdf4d17351dd@kernel.org

[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260610-slab_alloc_flags-v2-0-7190909db118%40kernel.org?part=9
[2] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260615-kfree_rcu_nolock-v3-0-70a54f3775bb%40kernel.org?part=5
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/1816e94b-87e0-4276-8ff7-1fb651326ab3@kernel.org

---
Harry Yoo (Meta) (5):
      mm/memcontrol: defer obj_cgroup_release() to irq_work
      mm/slab: handle allow_spin in slab_free_hook() instead of open coding
      mm/slab: call debug_locks and KCSAN checks in kfree_nolock()
      mm/slab: fix a deadlock in memcg_alloc_abort_single()
      mm/slab: serialize deferred_work_barrier()

 include/linux/memcontrol.h |   2 +
 mm/memcontrol.c            |  27 +++++++++--
 mm/slub.c                  | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 3 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 03a176b9248c4513bb705ed3d931af3a7e9c2a08
change-id: 20260624-kmalloc-nolock-fixes-c97675328773

Best regards,
--  
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon


             reply	other threads:[~2026-11-03 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-03 14:47 Harry Yoo (Meta) [this message]
2026-11-03 14:47 ` [PATCH for-next-fixes v2 1/5] mm/memcontrol: defer obj_cgroup_release() to irq_work Harry Yoo (Meta)
2026-11-03 14:47 ` [PATCH for-next-fixes v2 2/5] mm/slab: handle allow_spin in slab_free_hook() instead of open coding Harry Yoo (Meta)
2026-11-03 14:47 ` [PATCH for-next-fixes v2 3/5] mm/slab: call debug_locks and KCSAN checks in kfree_nolock() Harry Yoo (Meta)
2026-11-03 14:47 ` [PATCH for-next-fixes v2 4/5] mm/slab: fix a deadlock in memcg_alloc_abort_single() Harry Yoo (Meta)
2026-11-03 18:40   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-11-03 20:21     ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-03 21:11       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-11-03 14:47 ` [PATCH for-next-fixes v2 5/5] mm/slab: serialize deferred_work_barrier() Harry Yoo (Meta)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261103-kmalloc-nolock-fixes-v2-0-19167cfe4779@kernel.org \
    --to=harry@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®