From: Fang Xieyan <fangxy@xiaopeng.com>
To: "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Stefano Garzarella" <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, "Guanglei Zhu" <zhugl3@xiaopeng.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost/vringh: reject zero-length indirect descriptor tables
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 11:29:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261103032935.58823-1-fangxy@xiaopeng.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102122942-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Hi Michael,
Yes, same fix - sorry. The October 21 posting is a duplicate
of the v2 I posted on September 26:
https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/20260926160755.21485-1-fangxy@xiaopeng.com/
I resent it as a new patch instead of a v3.
The !len form is equivalent to v2's len < sizeof(struct
vring_desc) check when combined with the modulo check -
zero is the only length below one descriptor that is also
a multiple of the descriptor size.
The diagnostic change is to pass the byte-order converted
len instead of the raw desc->len, so the reported length is
correct when the vring byte order differs from the CPU byte
order.
Would you prefer that I send a v3 on the original v2 thread
with this diagnostic correction, or should I drop the
October 21 posting and leave v2 as is?
Thanks,
Fang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-21 7:02 Fang Xieyan
2026-11-02 17:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-11-03 3:29 ` Fang Xieyan [this message]
2026-11-03 10:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261103032935.58823-1-fangxy@xiaopeng.com \
--to=fangxy@xiaopeng.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zhugl3@xiaopeng.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®