From: Arthur Simchaev <arthur.simchaev@sandisk.com>
To: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
Pankaj Raghav <pankaj.raghav@linux.dev>,
GOST <gost.dev@samsung.com>, Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com>,
Avi.Shchislowski@sandisk.com, Alex.Lemberg@sandisk.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] block: add BLK_FEAT_ATOMIC_WRITE_MULTI
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 11:38:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261103093849.203851-1-arthur.simchaev@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929-nvme-mam-v1-1-48dcbe79cece@samsung.com>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 01:17:11PM +0200, Daniel Gomez wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> index d003a9d2d1f6c..92efd4ff67f26 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@ -360,6 +360,9 @@ typedef unsigned int __bitwise blk_features_t;
> #define BLK_FEAT_RAID_PARTIAL_STRIPES_EXPENSIVE \
> ((__force blk_features_t)(1u << 15))
>
> +/* device writes each atomic write boundary window of a command atomically */
> +#define BLK_FEAT_ATOMIC_WRITE_MULTI ((__force blk_features_t)(1u << 16))
With this flag set, a request with REQ_ATOMIC may now carry several independent
atomic writes rather than one. Code that looks at REQ_ATOMIC on a request (e.g.
blk_insert_cloned_request(), or a future SCSI WRITE ATOMIC user) needs to know
that. Could the comment here (or Documentation/block/) spell out what REQ_ATOMIC
means on a merged request, and what a driver must guarantee before setting the
flag?
It might also be useful to expose the feature in sysfs next to the other
atomic_write_* attributes, so users can tell whether merging across boundaries
is active on a device.
Regards,
Arthur
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 11:17 [PATCH RFC 0/2] Support for Multiple Atomicity Mode Daniel Gomez
2026-09-29 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] block: add BLK_FEAT_ATOMIC_WRITE_MULTI Daniel Gomez
2026-11-03 9:38 ` Arthur Simchaev [this message]
2026-09-29 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] nvme: enable multiple atomicity mode Daniel Gomez
2026-11-03 9:38 ` Arthur Simchaev
2026-11-03 9:38 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] Support for Multiple Atomicity Mode Arthur Simchaev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261103093849.203851-1-arthur.simchaev@sandisk.com \
--to=arthur.simchaev@sandisk.com \
--cc=Alex.Lemberg@sandisk.com \
--cc=Avi.Shchislowski@sandisk.com \
--cc=andres@anarazel.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
--cc=da.gomez@samsung.com \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pankaj.raghav@linux.dev \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®