mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jianyungao89@gmail.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jianyun Gao <jianyungao89@gmail.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
	Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>,
	Yuzuki Ishiyama <ishiyama@hpc.is.uec.ac.jp>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org (open list:XFS FILESYSTEM)
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fix spurious len double-counting in rmap three-way merge check
Date: Tue,  3 Nov 2026 22:41:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261103144148.14430-1-jianyungao89@gmail.com> (raw)

From: Jianyun Gao <jianyungao89@gmail.com>

In xfs_rmap_map, the left-edge merge path already executes
ltrec.rm_blockcount += len at line 1119 before checking whether the
right record is also contiguous and can be merged.  The subsequent
overflow guard therefore must compare the already-incremented
ltrec.rm_blockcount plus gtrec.rm_blockcount against XFS_RMAP_LEN_MAX,
but it incorrectly adds len a second time:

(unsigned long)ltrec.rm_blockcount + len +
   gtrec.rm_blockcount <= XFS_RMAP_LEN_MAX

The extra len makes the check too strict: when the real merged length
does not overflow but the inflated value exceeds XFS_RMAP_LEN_MAX, the
three-way merge is rejected and the code falls back to a two-way merge,
leaving the right record unmerged.  This produces rmap btree
fragmentation but does not corrupt on-disk metadata.

Remove the spurious len from the overflow check.

Fixes: 0a1b0b3855cf7 ("xfs: add an extent to the rmap btree")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jianyun Gao <jianyungao89@gmail.com>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap.c
index 14aef87837a9..c2b2f8e7502d 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_rmap.c
@@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@ xfs_rmap_map(
 		if (have_gt &&
 		    bno + len == gtrec.rm_startblock &&
 		    (ignore_off || offset + len == gtrec.rm_offset) &&
-		    (unsigned long)ltrec.rm_blockcount + len +
+		    (unsigned long)ltrec.rm_blockcount +
 				gtrec.rm_blockcount <= XFS_RMAP_LEN_MAX) {
 			/*
 			 * right edge also contiguous, delete right record
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2026-11-03 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-03 14:41 jianyungao89 [this message]
2026-11-03 15:32 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-11-04  3:27   ` Jianyun Gao
2026-11-04 15:00     ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-11-05 13:16       ` Jianyun Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261103144148.14430-1-jianyungao89@gmail.com \
    --to=jianyungao89@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=ishiyama@hpc.is.uec.ac.jp \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®