From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.216.248.207 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793719525; b=uzZVA/nR2/dmbTJtBREaR94xF1whkMtpPxVFcv0pfLB66m8aebQtTVb0gLQS4z1AnBmx KEfgariW62+FG/pR0PiyzGhYAQ1WQ8hKA2XIVbdR1nsLBRGBfw7+lZGMNVdYEVRsySejs Gpi+1Gboz9qEiR2dLI1MHTlIuG8u7myKib5GzsCXeoyINOvc1TksMdrwEI2JLfellQ+sx 8cl868Hnh4hrrQ+ufBq31HeGMW6FdphFOUirAcd4Ve2djSR1dNvc1SVbGzOzUksnRVTo8 WGtpY51gWq23PODw7JA7K5WUECf3LZAl8G8Z5lntnAPnJ67PMHzFuMNM7+vLtrGlJRA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793719525; h=DMARC-Filter:Date:X-Lima-ML-UUID:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Cc:Subject: Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Organization:X-Mailer:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=cnJ9B7JkswprQPLXGI0ImQv2Tj7y+YQDejoqKbdD7DY=; b=TvgvBiRjgZKnVPssB7rA34cvi3ROOsQp37AouwHsVEqO8XwkizGTheneGuQiqToaLyEW lmM1O/xy+o+YlCU0eZqdn+c2CJt6ryAW75zO5GUc88fBFnJpi+sCeP3f6o3uQWgCm39+W 7H4uscPin/QUl4QMPLLaN2C5zqZLmmRy6kxM8cdMajt7vbejf6RhZG6G3hGR/IsmiD3uJ W/AvqtUQW7WHxSzfIRcxCibOm5/TjzYhJLP4y5eGdRwuNH5+ejJMXfr1S1RA24Zqm7rog hrLrtjsOCKoPkV8VZFMaNRaNsh/q2jgnXCtlgPrr87x/Zfs3g73QPQtVJ5sxO+6VGGQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none header.from=deq.rocks; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=deq.rocks; dkim=pass header.d=deq.rocks header.i=@deq.rocks header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=securedbylima-20251205 header.b=vrCVlLh9; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=91.216.248.207 Received: from mx5.mail-out.lima-city.de (mx5.mail-out.lima-city.de [91.216.248.207]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA44C606A329 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 15:25:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org EA44C606A329 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deq.rocks Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=deq.rocks Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=deq.rocks header.i=@deq.rocks header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=securedbylima-20251205 header.b=vrCVlLh9 Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 16:25:12 +0100 X-Lima-ML-UUID: e4870b7e-9828-46f9-914d-9fb9ffacc200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=deq.rocks; s=securedbylima-20251205; t=1793719516; bh=njPnq2aWT4E//QJrFHKeY7X8sbaPLa6DqsdOZFRP2uI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vrCVlLh9oESE2yAVr+1ERF32JCpba+KbVd8efy0/Cg30jL8cMIUpayucO9eKKh+M9 nYFdn4aiuGgB+URDxB5ariF5wBYgBuoddSOX3T75yEvF6yKdf7leH+9w8fF2jNNN9p lQ2//60uxIrjWL84hPU+HxhtOTey8D5y+HQtQjtRSS0bOLKVxa4K+mwzpOY27Y6NYu XsdZYa7Ha2zpOpiiAy6EajgIi1HK3d/xIs5nAns5XrdUfzAlkKmtvZu3wHLIMcv/mr Bxt613+RPQUB+E3uYhU7Pl2JkaqA2sU3Mc3NPLyKxUn/yVz1OL2Eko9yZk5xQttnj8 N9vwmZRAfoYDw== From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOp?= Eikmeyer To: Alex Deucher Cc: Ed Schofield , amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Kenneth Feng , Alex Deucher , Atharva Tiwari , Christian =?UTF-8?B?S8O2bmln?= , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drm/amd/pm: defer UCLK DPM on selected Apple Navi GPUs Message-ID: <20261103162512.2ec834ac@kait2en-mbp15-1> In-Reply-To: References: <20260916144014.879355-1-ed@aicharmers.com> <20261030123000.5573e70f@kait2en-mbp15-1> Organization: KaiT2en X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 3 Nov 2026 09:30:34 -0500 Alex Deucher wrote: > It is the same issue. I don't want two fixes for the same issue. Understandable, but it is not. Two devs told you the same independently. On another note I reviewed your patch. It only rejects empty or zero levels. On the 16,1 the pptable levels (736/750 MHz) are non-zero. Besides other issues in the code, the commit message says the exact patch wasn't tested, yet v5 extends it to every Apple Navi 1x. I am sorry but your patch is implausible to me. Andre