From: "Jose Fernandez (Anthropic)" <jose.fernandez@linux.dev>
To: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Krystian Kaniewski <krystianmkaniewski@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/filemap: stop fault-around when the walk steps back
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 23:12:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261104-jf-filemap-v2-pedro-reply-r2-74c87c6fbcf@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aunPI5eOUOAEUa8d@pedro-suse.tail5790ac.ts.net>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 12:12:58PM +0000, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand. xas_find() was fixed. Is there any other case where
> this loop can step backwards?
>
> If not, I don't think this should be Cc: stable, and should probably be a WARN_ON().
> As it's a hardening patch and not an actual bugfix.
Yes, there is at least one more case. It triggers when a read fault
starts a lookup inside a large folio while a hole punch removes that
folio and a write puts part of it back. A stress test I wrote for the
race still made the fault-around walk step back with Krystian's
xas_find() fix applied. It happened in every run with an artificial
delay in the lookup and in 2 out of 40 runs without one. Some of those
step backs left a page mapped before the start of the mapping, and the
kernel reported it as a bad rss-counter when the process exited. With
this patch applied none did.
A WARN_ON() doesn't fit because ordinary operations racing with a fault
can reach this. So I recommend keeping the Fixes and stable tags as
David suggested on v1.
- Jose
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-31 4:33 Jose Fernandez (Anthropic)
2026-11-02 17:27 ` Andrew Morton
2026-11-02 21:47 ` Jan Kara
2026-11-03 12:12 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-11-04 23:12 ` Jose Fernandez (Anthropic) [this message]
2026-11-05 12:19 ` Pedro Falcato
2026-11-05 10:07 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261104-jf-filemap-v2-pedro-reply-r2-74c87c6fbcf@linux.dev \
--to=jose.fernandez@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=krystianmkaniewski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®