From: Jianping Liu <frankljpliu@gmail.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
libaokun@linux.alibaba.com, jack@suse.cz, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
frankjpliu@tencent.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ext4: fix soft lockup while shrinking the extent status cache
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 11:35:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261104033539.3031910-1-frankljpliu@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
__es_shrink() walks sbi->s_es_list and reclaims extents from each
inode. On a non-preemptible kernel that walk never gives up the CPU.
There is a soft lockup report on our company's machine. The machine
with millions of active inodes, 256 CPUs, and heavy memory pressure,
concurrent shrinkers run too long.
i_es_lock is dropped after es_reclaim_extents(), and s_es_lock is not
taken again until the next inode. When nr_to_scan remains, call
cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs() before continuing the scan.
cond_resched() does not report the RCU quiescent state needed here.
It is compiled out when CONFIG_PREEMPTION=y. Otherwise it schedules
through preempt_schedule(), and RCU records that switch as a
preemption. An RCU-tasks read-side section ends only at a voluntary
context switch, cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(), idle, or return to
userspace. The helper reports that voluntary quiescent state and still
lets a non-preemptible kernel reschedule.
Changes from v1:
- Delete time out logic.
- Change "cond_resched" to "cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs".
Link: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-ext4/patch/20261028061628.1209508-1-frankljpliu@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>
---
fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
index 018b6146b9d8..62346eaf4350 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
@@ -1721,6 +1721,16 @@ static int __es_shrink(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, int nr_to_scan,
if (nr_to_scan <= 0)
goto out;
+
+ /*
+ * Report a voluntary RCU-tasks quiescent state before continuing.
+ * cond_resched() is not enough: it is compiled out under
+ * CONFIG_PREEMPTION, and otherwise switches via preemption, which
+ * does not end an RCU-tasks read-side section.
+ * This also lets a non-preemptible kernel reschedule.
+ */
+ cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs();
+
spin_lock(&sbi->s_es_lock);
}
spin_unlock(&sbi->s_es_lock);
--
2.43.7
reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 3:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261104033539.3031910-1-frankljpliu@gmail.com \
--to=frankljpliu@gmail.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=frankjpliu@tencent.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®