mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>,
	gmonaco@redhat.com, ojeda@kernel.org, aliceryhl@google.com,
	gary@garyguo.net, namcao@linutronix.de, sashal@kernel.org,
	natalie.klaus@runtimeverification.com, willy@infradead.org,
	paulmck@kernel.org, corinnt@google.com,
	stewart@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	tytso@mit.edu, keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr,
	jean-pierre.lozi@inria.fr
Subject: Re: Kernel formal methods mailing list?
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 12:22:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026110410-vengeful-imminent-fe3c@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ed89f1ce-cdca-d6f6-3e1-f0fa34eac4d@namei.org>

On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 03:59:52PM -0800, James Morris wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> 
> I've tried to include folk who are known to be working on formal 
> verification for the Linux kernel. Apologies if I've missed anyone and 
> please forward as appropriate.
> 
> Several Linux kernel developers & researchers have been experimenting 
> with formal methods in recent times, I think largely due to the potential 
> of LLMs to lower some of the costs and barriers to entry.
> 
> Examples I'm aware of include a presentation by Corinn Tiffany at LPC on 
> her work with XArray [1], and Christian Brauner's linux-formal repo [2].
> 
> I've been experimenting with formal verification as part of a hypervisor 
> research project [3] (which is admittedly not the kernel).
> 
> I'm interested in learning from what others are doing in this area, and 
> sharing potentially useful findings, especially in terms of identifying 
> _practical_ approaches for verification of low-level systems code.
> 
> I suspect there's a lot that can be done on smaller scale, well-defined 
> projects, by developers who don't necessarily have specific expertise in 
> formal methods, but have deep expertise in the target subsystem.
> 
> Thoughts? Would it be worth setting up a mailing list?

Sure, what's one more list for us to be on :)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-04 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-03 23:59 James Morris
2026-11-04  2:57 ` Natalie Klaus
2026-11-04 11:22 ` Greg KH [this message]
2026-11-04 13:23 ` Miguel Ojeda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2026110410-vengeful-imminent-fe3c@gregkh \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=corinnt@google.com \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
    --cc=jean-pierre.lozi@inria.fr \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
    --cc=natalie.klaus@runtimeverification.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®