From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: 0z5a <dezhen.lu@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-rc] RDMA/mlx5: Fix DevX umem page size truncation for pages >= 4G
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 12:07:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261104100747.GD478286@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103142804.67210-1-dezhen.lu@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 03:28:04PM +0100, 0z5a wrote:
> From: Dezhen Lu <dezhen.lu@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
>
> devx_umem_find_best_pgsize() computes the page size in an unsigned long
> but returns it as unsigned int, and devx_umem_reg_cmd_alloc() stores it
> in an unsigned int. When the DMA mapping of the umem is contiguous and
> aligned to 4 GiB or more, and the umem length is a multiple of that
> size, ib_umem_find_best_pgoff() selects a page size >= 2^32. Since the
> value is a power of two, the truncation turns it into 0 and the
> registration fails with -EINVAL.
>
> The umem log_page_size field is 5 bits wide on top of
> MLX5_ADAPTER_PAGE_SHIFT, so the command can encode these page sizes.
>
> Seen on two GH200 nodes (ConnectX-7, firmware 32.38.3056 and
> 32.43.1014) with a dma-buf exported from cudaMalloc memory: registering
> 4 GiB or 8 GiB umems at 4 GiB-aligned offsets of the dma-buf fails with
> EINVAL every time, while 2 GiB umems at the same offsets and
> ibv_reg_dmabuf_mr() of the same ranges succeed. Restricting the user
> pgsz_bitmap to <= 2 GiB makes all of them succeed.
>
> Other large physically contiguous buffers, such as a 16 GiB hugetlb
> page on an arm64 kernel with 64K base pages, should hit the same path.
>
> Use unsigned long for the page size, as commit f0c2427412b4
> ("RDMA/mlx5: Fix page_size variable overflow") already did for the MR
> paths.
>
> The bug was found by an AI coding assistant (Claude Opus 5.5, Anthropic)
> during an audit of 32-bit truncations of page sizes and offsets in
> drivers/infiniband/core and drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5. The assistant
> also wrote the reproducer and this patch. The reproducer was run on the
> GH200 nodes described above.
>
> Fixes: 7610ab57de56 ("RDMA/mlx5: Allow larger pages in DevX umem")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Dezhen Lu <dezhen.lu@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Testing notes:
> - The failures above were reproduced with the DOCA-OFED 26.01 mlx5_ib,
> whose devx_umem_find_best_pgsize() is identical to upstream; I do not
> have root on these hosts, so I could not load a patched module.
> - So I have not verified that CREATE_UMEM accepts log_page_size values
> for pages >= 4 GiB. If it does not, capping pgsz_bitmap at 2^31 in
> devx_umem_find_best_pgsize() is the alternative fix.
> - Compile-tested on v7.4-rc1 (arm64 defconfig + MLX5_INFINIBAND, W=1).
> - A standalone reproducer (dma-buf from cuMemGetHandleForAddressRange()
> plus mlx5dv_devx_umem_reg_ex(), sweeping offsets) is available on
> request.
Isn't this fix enough?
https://patch.msgid.link/r/1-v1-88303e9e509f+f7-ib_umem_types_jgg@nvidia.com
15fe76e23615 ("RDMA/umem: Fix truncation for block sizes >= 4G")
Thanks
>
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/devx.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/devx.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/devx.c
> index fc6f793dc..2277160d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/devx.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/devx.c
> @@ -2294,8 +2294,8 @@ static int devx_umem_get(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, struct ib_ucontext *ucontext,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static unsigned int devx_umem_find_best_pgsize(struct ib_umem *umem,
> - unsigned long pgsz_bitmap)
> +static unsigned long devx_umem_find_best_pgsize(struct ib_umem *umem,
> + unsigned long pgsz_bitmap)
> {
> unsigned long page_size;
>
> @@ -2333,7 +2333,7 @@ static int devx_umem_reg_cmd_alloc(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev,
> int access)
> {
> unsigned long pgsz_bitmap;
> - unsigned int page_size;
> + unsigned long page_size;
> __be64 *mtt;
> void *umem;
> int ret;
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 14:28 0z5a
2026-11-04 10:07 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2026-11-04 17:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-04 17:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-11-03 14:27 0z5a
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261104100747.GD478286@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=dezhen.lu@student.uni-tuebingen.de \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®