mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@hugovil.com>
To: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@hugovil.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jirislaby@kernel.org,
	alan@linux.intel.com, gregkh@suse.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com>,
	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] serial: core: fixes and improvements to uart_get_baud_rate()
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 11:06:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261104110634.fa87be2fd8953cee05056690@hugovil.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020184131.2893575-1-hugo@hugovil.com>

On Tue, 20 Oct 2026 14:41:16 -0400
Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@hugovil.com> wrote:

> From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com>
> 
> serial: core: fixes and improvements to uart_get_baud_rate()
> 
> Hello,
> this patch series brings fixes and improvements to uart_get_baud_rate()
> 
> This is in part based on discussions following Hui patches submission [1]
> to fix a divide by zero fault originating from uart_get_baud_rate().
> 
> Patch 1 is the fix for the above mentioned bug, as suggested by Hui
> but with much improved comments, bug report and reproduce steps so that is is
> easier to follow and understand. In original discussion, it was suggested by
> Ilpo and me that when rate gets lowered, it should alter the termios to prevent
> what is here seem as "old" having an invalid value. This is not handled by this
> series at the moment, as this may be more complex than anticipated.
> 
> Patch 2 is another fix for a potential divide by zero scenario.
> 
> Patch 3 removes any possibility for the function to return zero baud rate
> if the loop exits without a valid baud rate. History has shown that for
> this function, there was often unforeseen or unanticipated conditions
> that made the loop exit unexpectedly with a zero baud rate.
> 
> Patch 4 is a small improvement in readability to avoid a redundant baud
> assignment without any UPF_SPD_* flags. It could be merged with the refactor
> patch if deemed appropriate.
> 
> Patch 5 is a refactoring of uart_get_baud_rate() to make it easier to
> understand and analyze, and more linear, as with the current loop is is
> sometimes not easy to fully grasp what is happening. But in the end, I
> am not sure it is worth it as the loop makes things more efficient and
> simpler. I include the patch for discussion, but it may be removed from
> this series.
> 
> Tested the changes on a custom board with imx uart and two SC16IS752 DUART
> over a SPI interface using a Variscite IMX6 SOM.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260930125901.778868-1-benquike@gmail.com/ [1]
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Hugo Villeneuve (5):
>   serial: core: fix division by zero if old termios is present but has
>     invalid rate
>   serial: core: clip out-of-range baud rate to min/max, not min+1/max-1
>   serial: core: always return in-range baud rate even in case of failure
>   serial: core: avoid redundant baud assignment without any UPF_SPD_*
>     flags
>   serial: core: refactor uart_get_baud_rate() for readability
> 
>  drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

Hi,
I think this series has some implications for Maciej series "Don't 
clobber the baud rate on hangup via B0" [1], so this is a small
ping...

https://lore.kernel.org/all/alpine.DEB.2.21.2611030057510.15685@angie.orcam.me.uk/raw
[1]


-- 
Hugo Villeneuve

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-04 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-20 18:41 Hugo Villeneuve
2026-10-20 18:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] serial: core: fix division by zero if old termios is present but has invalid rate Hugo Villeneuve
2026-10-20 18:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] serial: core: clip out-of-range baud rate to min/max, not min+1/max-1 Hugo Villeneuve
2026-10-20 18:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] serial: core: always return in-range baud rate even in case of failure Hugo Villeneuve
2026-10-20 18:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] serial: core: avoid redundant baud assignment without any UPF_SPD_* flags Hugo Villeneuve
2026-10-20 18:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] serial: core: refactor uart_get_baud_rate() for readability Hugo Villeneuve
2026-11-04 16:06 ` Hugo Villeneuve [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261104110634.fa87be2fd8953cee05056690@hugovil.com \
    --to=hugo@hugovil.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®