From: Yiqi Sun <sunyiqixm@gmail.com>
To: fuchen.dust@gmail.com
Cc: coreteam@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de, kadlec@netfilter.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, pablo@netfilter.org,
phil@nwl.cc, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf v3] netfilter: ipset: fix double free on kernel-side delete during resize
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 12:52:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261105045210.1179991-1-sunyiqixm@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261026102957.5530-1-fuchen.dust@gmail.com>
Hi,
I discovered the same double-free during ipset hash resize
and confirmed its exploitability by successfully exploiting it
in my test environment.
While reviewing this fix, I noticed two remaining issues with the
deferred operations in net/netfilter/ipset/ip_set_hash_gen.h:
1. Failure-path replay can resurrect a deleted element.
In mtype_resize(), cleanup clears orig->resizing before reaching the new
drain path. Packet-path operations can then modify the original table
directly, while earlier operations are still waiting in the backlog.
For example, starting with A absent:
- During resize, a packet-path ADD inserts A into the original table
and also queues an ADD in orig->ad.
- A bucket allocation in the resize copy loop fails. cleanup clears
orig->resizing and waits for an RCU grace period.
- Before drain replays the backlog, a later packet-path DEL removes A
from the original table and returns success without queuing a DEL.
- drain replays the earlier ADD, inserting A again.
The final state therefore contradicts the later successful DEL. Before
this change, the failure path discarded the queued ADD, so this sequence
left A absent.
The set->lock around list_splice_init() protects the list, but does not
serialize replay with packet-path updates under the region locks. The
RCU grace period does not prevent new updates either. Could failure-path
replay preserve ordering with those updates as well as within the backlog?
2. The new deferred-ADD branch can return success without queuing the ADD.
In mtype_add(), the new branch for an existing element sets ret = 0 and
jumps to resize. If allocation of struct mtype_resize_ad fails there,
the existing "Don't bother" path goes to out with ret still zero.
For example, starting with A present:
- During resize, a packet-path DEL queues a deletion of A, leaving A
in the original table.
- A subsequent packet-path ADD of A, without IPSET_FLAG_EXIST, takes
the new branch.
- Backlog allocation fails, but the ADD returns success.
- Replaying the queued DEL leaves A absent because no ADD was queued.
This branch relies entirely on the backlog to preserve the ADD after
the pending DEL. Allocation failure should at least return -ENOMEM for
this deferred-only case, consistent with the deferred-DEL path.
Validation of the two review findings above used a userspace harness
containing the extracted add/delete functions and failure-path replay
code, with lock/RCU stubs. Both sequences produced the incorrect final
state with v3; the corresponding unpatched baseline cases did not.
The baseline was mainline commit 05441d697f7f ("Merge tag 'cocci-7.4-rc1'
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jlawall/linux"). These
are deterministic control-flow checks, not reproductions on a running
kernel.
This review and the harness were prepared with AI assistance.
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 4:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 16:33 [PATCH nf] " Xue Boyang
2026-10-14 12:50 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2026-10-25 14:07 ` Xue Boyang
2026-10-25 14:07 ` [PATCH nf v2] " Xue Boyang
2026-10-26 10:29 ` [PATCH nf v3] " Xue Boyang
2026-11-05 4:52 ` Yiqi Sun [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261105045210.1179991-1-sunyiqixm@gmail.com \
--to=sunyiqixm@gmail.com \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=fuchen.dust@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®