From: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
To: <sched-ext@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tj@kernel.org>,
<void@manifault.com>, <arighi@nvidia.com>, <changwoo@igalia.com>,
<tanghui22@huawei.com>, <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] sched_ext: Extract construction of a single LLC CID range
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 14:50:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261105065013.784398-4-zhangqiao22@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105065013.784398-1-zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
Extract the per-LLC walk into scx_cid_build_llc(), which consumes one
LLC worth of cpus from b->node_scratch and appends their cores,
clusters and shards. All per-LLC state - the llc cid and index, the
shard layout counters and the cluster carry - is local to the helper;
cross-LLC state stays in the builder.
The two WARN_ON_ONCE checks now return -EINVAL to the caller instead
of returning straight out of scx_cid_init(); the value and its effect
on the error path are unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com>
---
kernel/sched/ext/cid.c | 206 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/cid.c b/kernel/sched/ext/cid.c
index ee55f101e5c5..54eacdc23d32 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/cid.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/cid.c
@@ -180,6 +180,110 @@ struct scx_cid_builder {
u32 shard_size, max_cids;
};
+static s32 scx_cid_build_llc(struct scx_cid_builder *b, s32 nid,
+ s32 node_cid, s32 node_idx)
+{
+ s32 ncpu = cpumask_first(b->node_scratch);
+ const struct cpumask *llc_mask = cpu_llc_mask(ncpu, b->llc_fallback);
+ s32 llc_cid = b->next_cid;
+ s32 llc_idx = b->next_llc_idx++;
+ u32 cores_per_shard, nr_large;
+ u32 shard_local = 0, cores_in_shard = 0, cids_in_shard = 0;
+ s32 shard_cid, shard_idx;
+ s32 cluster_cid = -1, cluster_idx = -1;
+
+ /* b->llc_scratch = b->node_scratch & this llc */
+ cpumask_and(b->llc_scratch, b->node_scratch, llc_mask);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(ncpu, b->llc_scratch)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ calc_shard_layout(b->llc_scratch, b->shard_size, &cores_per_shard, &nr_large);
+ shard_cid = b->next_cid;
+ shard_idx = b->next_shard_idx++;
+ b->tbls->shard_node[shard_idx] = nid;
+
+ while (!cpumask_empty(b->llc_scratch)) {
+ const struct cpumask *sib;
+ s32 core_cid, core_idx, lcpu, ccpu;
+ u32 max_cores, cids_in_core;
+
+ /*
+ * Take the cores of one cluster before moving
+ * on, so that a cluster is a contiguous cid
+ * range like the core, LLC and node levels.
+ */
+ if (cpumask_empty(b->cluster_scratch)) {
+ s32 xcpu = cpumask_first(b->llc_scratch);
+
+ cpumask_or(b->cluster_scratch,
+ topology_cluster_cpumask(xcpu),
+ topology_sibling_cpumask(xcpu));
+ cpumask_and(b->cluster_scratch, b->cluster_scratch,
+ b->llc_scratch);
+ cluster_cid = b->next_cid;
+ cluster_idx = b->next_cluster_idx++;
+ }
+
+ lcpu = cpumask_first(b->cluster_scratch);
+ sib = topology_sibling_cpumask(lcpu);
+ core_cid = b->next_cid;
+ core_idx = b->next_core_idx++;
+
+ /* b->core_scratch = b->cluster_scratch & this core */
+ cpumask_and(b->core_scratch, b->cluster_scratch, sib);
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(lcpu, b->core_scratch)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * Advance to a new shard when either core or
+ * cid count reaches max. The latter bounds
+ * shard sizes under uneven SMT. Never start an
+ * empty shard.
+ */
+ cids_in_core = cpumask_weight(b->core_scratch);
+ max_cores = cores_per_shard + (shard_local < nr_large ? 1 : 0);
+ if (cores_in_shard &&
+ (cores_in_shard >= max_cores ||
+ cids_in_shard + cids_in_core > b->max_cids)) {
+ shard_local++;
+ cores_in_shard = 0;
+ cids_in_shard = 0;
+ shard_cid = b->next_cid;
+ shard_idx = b->next_shard_idx++;
+ b->tbls->shard_node[shard_idx] = nid;
+ }
+ cores_in_shard++;
+ cids_in_shard += cids_in_core;
+
+ for_each_cpu(ccpu, b->core_scratch) {
+ s32 cid = b->next_cid++;
+
+ b->tbls->cid_to_cpu[cid] = ccpu;
+ b->tbls->cpu_to_cid[ccpu] = cid;
+ b->tbls->cid_to_shard[cid] = shard_idx;
+ b->tbls->topo[cid] = (struct scx_cid_topo){
+ .core_cid = core_cid,
+ .core_idx = core_idx,
+ .llc_cid = llc_cid,
+ .llc_idx = llc_idx,
+ .node_cid = node_cid,
+ .node_idx = node_idx,
+ .shard_cid = shard_cid,
+ .shard_idx = shard_idx,
+ .cluster_cid = cluster_cid,
+ .cluster_idx = cluster_idx,
+ };
+
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(ccpu, b->cluster_scratch);
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(ccpu, b->llc_scratch);
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(ccpu, b->node_scratch);
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(ccpu, b->to_walk);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void scx_cid_build_notopo(struct scx_cid_builder *b)
{
u32 notopo_in_shard;
@@ -333,103 +437,11 @@ s32 scx_cid_init(struct scx_sched *sch)
return -EINVAL;
while (!cpumask_empty(b.node_scratch)) {
- s32 ncpu = cpumask_first(b.node_scratch);
- const struct cpumask *llc_mask = cpu_llc_mask(ncpu, b.llc_fallback);
- s32 llc_cid = b.next_cid;
- s32 llc_idx = b.next_llc_idx++;
- u32 cores_per_shard, nr_large;
- u32 shard_local = 0, cores_in_shard = 0, cids_in_shard = 0;
- s32 shard_cid, shard_idx;
- s32 cluster_cid = -1, cluster_idx = -1;
-
- /* b.llc_scratch = b.node_scratch & this llc */
- cpumask_and(b.llc_scratch, b.node_scratch, llc_mask);
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(ncpu, b.llc_scratch)))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- calc_shard_layout(b.llc_scratch, b.shard_size, &cores_per_shard, &nr_large);
- shard_cid = b.next_cid;
- shard_idx = b.next_shard_idx++;
- b.tbls->shard_node[shard_idx] = nid;
-
- while (!cpumask_empty(b.llc_scratch)) {
- const struct cpumask *sib;
- s32 core_cid, core_idx, lcpu, ccpu;
- u32 max_cores, cids_in_core;
-
- /*
- * Take the cores of one cluster before moving
- * on, so that a cluster is a contiguous cid
- * range like the core, LLC and node levels.
- */
- if (cpumask_empty(b.cluster_scratch)) {
- s32 xcpu = cpumask_first(b.llc_scratch);
-
- cpumask_or(b.cluster_scratch,
- topology_cluster_cpumask(xcpu),
- topology_sibling_cpumask(xcpu));
- cpumask_and(b.cluster_scratch, b.cluster_scratch,
- b.llc_scratch);
- cluster_cid = b.next_cid;
- cluster_idx = b.next_cluster_idx++;
- }
-
- lcpu = cpumask_first(b.cluster_scratch);
- sib = topology_sibling_cpumask(lcpu);
- core_cid = b.next_cid;
- core_idx = b.next_core_idx++;
-
- /* b.core_scratch = b.cluster_scratch & this core */
- cpumask_and(b.core_scratch, b.cluster_scratch, sib);
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpumask_test_cpu(lcpu, b.core_scratch)))
- return -EINVAL;
-
- /*
- * Advance to a new shard when either core or
- * cid count reaches max. The latter bounds
- * shard sizes under uneven SMT. Never start an
- * empty shard.
- */
- cids_in_core = cpumask_weight(b.core_scratch);
- max_cores = cores_per_shard + (shard_local < nr_large ? 1 : 0);
- if (cores_in_shard &&
- (cores_in_shard >= max_cores ||
- cids_in_shard + cids_in_core > b.max_cids)) {
- shard_local++;
- cores_in_shard = 0;
- cids_in_shard = 0;
- shard_cid = b.next_cid;
- shard_idx = b.next_shard_idx++;
- b.tbls->shard_node[shard_idx] = nid;
- }
- cores_in_shard++;
- cids_in_shard += cids_in_core;
-
- for_each_cpu(ccpu, b.core_scratch) {
- s32 cid = b.next_cid++;
-
- b.tbls->cid_to_cpu[cid] = ccpu;
- b.tbls->cpu_to_cid[ccpu] = cid;
- b.tbls->cid_to_shard[cid] = shard_idx;
- b.tbls->topo[cid] = (struct scx_cid_topo){
- .core_cid = core_cid,
- .core_idx = core_idx,
- .llc_cid = llc_cid,
- .llc_idx = llc_idx,
- .node_cid = node_cid,
- .node_idx = node_idx,
- .shard_cid = shard_cid,
- .shard_idx = shard_idx,
- .cluster_cid = cluster_cid,
- .cluster_idx = cluster_idx,
- };
-
- cpumask_clear_cpu(ccpu, b.cluster_scratch);
- cpumask_clear_cpu(ccpu, b.llc_scratch);
- cpumask_clear_cpu(ccpu, b.node_scratch);
- cpumask_clear_cpu(ccpu, b.to_walk);
- }
- }
+ s32 ret;
+
+ ret = scx_cid_build_llc(&b, nid, node_cid, node_idx);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
}
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 6:50 [PATCH 0/4] sched_ext: Decompose scx_cid_init() Zhang Qiao
2026-11-05 6:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched_ext: Extract no-topology CID construction and table finalization Zhang Qiao
2026-11-05 6:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched_ext: Collect CID construction state in a private builder Zhang Qiao
2026-11-05 6:50 ` Zhang Qiao [this message]
2026-11-05 6:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched_ext: Extract online CID construction from scx_cid_init Zhang Qiao
2026-11-05 17:10 ` [PATCH 0/4] sched_ext: Decompose scx_cid_init() Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261105065013.784398-4-zhangqiao22@huawei.com \
--to=zhangqiao22@huawei.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tanghui22@huawei.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®