From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: ptp: fix support for PTP_EXTTS_REQUEST2 ioctl
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 17:25:40 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261105102540.2273912-1-jjc@jclark.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179387332308.488856.2315265262072517836@kernel.org>
On Thu, 05 Nov 2026 10:08:43 +0000, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> The commit message says:
>
> Only the PTP_EXTTS_REQUEST ioctl still works.
>
> That suggests v1 behaviour is unchanged. Could the commit message
> describe the v1 change explicitly, since the patch is tagged for stable?
Sashiko made the same point on the equivalent am65-cpts fix, which was
applied unchanged as e3aaeebbef56. My reply there applies here too:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261022035226.1388675-1-jjc@jclark.com/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 5:25 James Clark
2026-11-04 8:58 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-11-04 21:12 ` Jacob Keller
2026-11-04 9:06 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-11-04 9:26 ` Kory Maincent
2026-11-05 10:08 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-05 10:25 ` James Clark [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261105102540.2273912-1-jjc@jclark.com \
--to=jjc@jclark.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®