From: "Li Zhe" <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
To: <muchun.song@linux.dev>, <osalvador@suse.de>, <david@kernel.org>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <rppt@kernel.org>,
<apopple@nvidia.com>, <balbirs@nvidia.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Li Zhe" <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] mm: optimize HugeTLB bootmem hugepage init
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 20:06:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261105120615.16817-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com> (raw)
This series speeds up the fallback initialization path for HugeTLB tail
struct pages during boot-time hugepage allocation, when HugeTLB vmemmap
optimization (HVO) is unavailable or fails.
Patch 1 factors the existing ZONE_DEVICE template-copy operation into
memmap_init_page_from_template().
Patch 2 reuses that helper in hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap():
initialize the first tail page normally, copy it into a local template,
then initialize the remaining tail pages by refreshing only PFN-dependent
fields before copying the template.
In the earlier discussion, Mike asked whether the same kind of
template-based initialization also helps the ordinary struct page
initialization path:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/akfB6Qe-jKDEMUxz@kernel.org/
I tested that direction as well, but did not see a measurable benefit
for ordinary struct page initialization. The measurable improvement I
could find is in the HugeTLB bootmem hugepage tail path, where gigantic
pages can require initializing a large number of tail struct pages when
HVO does not cover the allocation.
Tested on an arm64 QEMU/KVM guest with 4K base pages and 64 boot-time 1G
hugepages. HVO is unavailable on arm64 in v7.4-rc1, so the fallback tail
initialization path is exercised.
Results averaged over five boots, measured with a temporary
jiffies-based printk:
base: 318.4 ms
with this patch: 202.4 ms
This is a 36.43% reduction in the measured fallback tail initialization
time. The temporary measurement instrumentation is not part of this
series.
Li Zhe (2):
mm/mm_init: factor out memmap_init_page_from_template()
mm/hugetlb: optimize bootmem hugepage tail vmemmap init
mm/hugetlb.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
mm/mm_init.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
mm/mm_init.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--
2.20.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 12:06 Li Zhe [this message]
2026-11-05 12:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/mm_init: factor out memmap_init_page_from_template() Li Zhe
2026-11-06 10:34 ` Balbir Singh
2026-11-05 12:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/hugetlb: optimize bootmem hugepage tail vmemmap init Li Zhe
2026-11-06 10:23 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261105120615.16817-1-lizhe.67@bytedance.com \
--to=lizhe.67@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®