From: "Carlos López" <clopez@suse.de>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, seanjc@google.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org,
peterx@redhat.com, ljs@kernel.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
"Carlos López" <clopez@suse.de>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
"Oscar Salvador" <osalvador@suse.de>,
"Jann Horn" <jannh@google.com>,
"Pedro Falcato" <pfalcato@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/9] mm/mmu_notifier: add MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_PERM_UPGRADE
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 17:50:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261105165004.2663799-10-clopez@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105165004.2663799-4-clopez@suse.de>
Add a range flag marking an invalidation that only upgrades permissions,
with no PFN change and no revoked access. change_protection() sets it
for MM_CP_PERM_UPGRADE and for the userfaultfd resolves, which unprotect
a page and thus only restore access.
Now that change_protection() keeps writable entries writable on these
changes, no present entry loses access. Writable migration and
device-private entries are still made read-only, which does not affect
secondary MMUs. Migration entries are only installed after secondary
MMUs are invalidated, and device-private pages are migrated back, with
an invalidation, before the CPU can access them.
hugetlb_change_protection() never sets the flag, as hugetlb does not
restore the write bit and may unshare page tables.
A secondary MMU can use the flag to keep its mappings rather than zap
them. Consumers that ignore it are unaffected.
Signed-off-by: Carlos López <clopez@suse.de>
---
include/linux/mmu_notifier.h | 5 +++++
mm/hugetlb.c | 4 ++++
mm/mprotect.c | 5 +++--
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
index a11a44eef521..112be28cdf6b 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
@@ -60,6 +60,11 @@ enum mmu_notifier_event {
};
#define MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_BLOCKABLE (1 << 0)
+/*
+ * Set on an invalidation that only expands permissions without
+ * revoking any existing access, nor freeing/moving the underlying page.
+ */
+#define MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_PERM_UPGRADE (1 << 1)
struct mmu_notifier_ops {
/*
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index da5d04edf7c1..1a69d1da527e 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -6606,6 +6606,10 @@ long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* In the case of shared PMDs, the area to flush could be beyond
* start/end. Set range.start/range.end to cover the maximum possible
* range if PMD sharing is possible.
+ *
+ * MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_PERM_UPGRADE is never set here. hugetlb does not
+ * restore the write bit, and huge_pmd_unshare() may drop the mapping,
+ * so this is not a strict permission upgrade.
*/
mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_VMA,
0, mm, start, end);
diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index 16b8aef755ab..fb2023dc6e66 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -601,8 +601,9 @@ static inline long change_pud_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
continue;
if (!range.start) {
- mmu_notifier_range_init(&range,
- MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_VMA, 0,
+ mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_PROTECTION_VMA,
+ mm_cp_is_perm_upgrade(cp_flags) ?
+ MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_PERM_UPGRADE : 0,
vma->vm_mm, addr, end);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
}
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 16:49 [PATCH v2 0/9] KVM: don't zap secondary MMU on permission upgrade Carlos López
2026-11-05 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mm: fix eager write-bit restore for write-notified shared mappings Carlos López
2026-11-05 16:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] riscv: mm: add pud_soft_dirty() Carlos López
2026-11-05 16:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] mm/huge_memory: honor MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE in change_huge_pud() Carlos López
2026-11-05 16:50 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] mm/mprotect: add MM_CP_PERM_UPGRADE Carlos López
2026-11-05 16:50 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] mm/mprotect: keep writable entries writable on permission upgrades Carlos López
2026-11-05 17:06 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-05 16:50 ` Carlos López [this message]
2026-11-05 16:50 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] KVM: pass the mmu_notifier event and flags to kvm_gfn_range Carlos López
2026-11-05 16:50 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] KVM: x86/mmu: don't zap secondary MMU on permission upgrade Carlos López
2026-11-05 16:50 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] KVM: s390: don't unmap the gmap " Carlos López
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261105165004.2663799-10-clopez@suse.de \
--to=clopez@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®