From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"K Prateek Nayak" <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"John Ogness" <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
"Shrikanth Hegde" <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
"luca abeni" <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
"Yuri Andriaccio" <yurand2000@gmail.com>,
"Yuri Andriaccio" <yuri.andriaccio@santannapisa.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Remove CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 20:30:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261105193010.tXUDDu2w@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <auy6nyTUuHBlgrV_@slm.duckdns.org>
On 2026-11-05 07:19:27 [-1000], Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Sebastian.
Hi Tejun,
>
> I'm not against it but wonder whether it'd be useful to do it more gradually
> so that people can pipe up if they depend on it. ie. Mark it deprecated and
> put it behind EXPORT for a bit and then BROKEN before actual removal.
I would be surprised if this is actually used especially since it is
cg-v1 and v2 is the default/ used by everyone (?).
This depended on !PREEMPT_RT in the RT queue. People asked if this can
be enabled because it looked useful/ for their use case. I researched
why it was like this and dropped that restriction. People then asked if
it is broken on RT because it is now working properly. I have never been
told _what_ is broken or *why* because nobody came back.
Later I've been told (there was an attempt to explain it to me, it was
late in the morning) and if I piece it properly together then, it could
work in UP environment but on SMP the accounting is wrong and therefore
the runtime/ preemption is not working as it should.
I didn't add this to the commit description because I would classify
this as hearsay and we do facts here. PeterZ might know more.
From what I know, people who asked for it either have a different
solution or eyeball HCBS.
> Thanks.
Sebastian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 16:47 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-11-05 17:19 ` Tejun Heo
2026-11-05 19:30 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261105193010.tXUDDu2w@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yurand2000@gmail.com \
--cc=yuri.andriaccio@santannapisa.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®