From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Linkui Xiao <xiaolinkui@126.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, michael.bommarito@gmail.com,
gnault@redhat.com, alice.kernel@fastmail.im, kuniyu@google.com,
nicoyip.dev@gmail.com, mail@david-bauer.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linkui Xiao <xiaolinkui@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] l2tp: bump tunnel stats before dropping the session reference
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 10:11:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261106101137.GF865646@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103084249.1337657-1-xiaolinkui@126.com>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 04:42:49PM +0800, Linkui Xiao wrote:
> From: Linkui Xiao <xiaolinkui@kylinos.cn>
>
> l2tp_udp_encap_recv() derives the tunnel pointer from the session it
> has just looked up, so the session reference is the only thing keeping
> the tunnel alive. Both error paths of the function drop the reference
> before jumping to the invalid label, which still dereferences the
> tunnel:
>
> tunnel = session->tunnel;
>
> if (version != tunnel->version) {
> l2tp_session_put(session);
> goto invalid;
> }
> ...
> invalid:
> atomic_long_inc(&tunnel->stats.rx_invalid);
>
> Reorder the error paths so the statistics are updated before the
> reference is dropped, removing the dependency on the tunnel staying
> allocated after its last reference is gone.
>
> Currently this is safe by accident: the only live entry point is the
> UDP encap_rcv hook, which is invoked under rcu_read_lock(), and the
> tunnel is freed by kfree_rcu(), so the tunnel memory outlives the
> dereference. Making the order explicitly correct keeps the function
> safe regardless of the calling context, instead of relying on every
> future caller holding an RCU read-side reference.
>
> The put on the version mismatch path came later, with commit
> 4d10edfd1475 ("l2tp: Fix memleak in l2tp_udp_encap_recv()."), which
> plugged a session leak.
>
> Found by inspection.
> Signed-off-by: Linkui Xiao <xiaolinkui@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Describe the change as hardening instead of a reachable
> use-after-free: the socket backlog path pointed at by the v1 commit
> message cannot be reached, and the live receive path always holds an
> RCU read-side reference, so the old ordering is currently safe
> (Sashiko AI review).
> - Drop the backport tags (the Fixes tag and the Cc to stable)
> accordingly and retitle the patch.
> - Correct the index line: the v1 patch carried the blob hashes of an
> earlier draft of this change, so its new hash did not match the file
> the diff actually produces.
> v1:
> - Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261027063657.1359170-1-xiaolinkui@126.com/
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 8:42 Linkui Xiao
2026-11-06 10:11 ` Simon Horman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261106101137.GF865646@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=alice.kernel@fastmail.im \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mail@david-bauer.net \
--cc=michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicoyip.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaolinkui@126.com \
--cc=xiaolinkui@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®