From: Joshua Crofts <crofts@kernel.org>
To: Satyam Gupta <sgsatyam@google.com>
Cc: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
"Benson Leung" <bleung@chromium.org>,
"Guenter Roeck" <groeck@chromium.org>,
"Tzung-Bi Shih" <tzungbi@kernel.org>,
"Enric Balletbo i Serra" <eballetbo@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iio: cros_ec: Use platform sensor_num to unregister FIFO callback
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 10:22:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261106102217.3bd67592@systembl0wer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106071904.142937-1-sgsatyam@google.com>
On Fri, 6 Nov 2026 07:19:04 +0000
Satyam Gupta <sgsatyam@google.com> wrote:
> cros_ec_sensors_core_register() registers the FIFO callback for the
> sensor number found in the platform data. The matching cleanup action,
> cros_ec_sensors_core_clean(), reads the number back from
> st->param.info.sensor_num instead.
>
> st->param is the EC host command buffer. Drivers fill it in under
> cmd_lock before each command, while the cleanup action reads it without
> that lock. It is also set only for physical sensors. If the field holds
> another value when the device is unbound, the cleanup clears the wrong
> slot and leaves the callback in place, still pointing to the iio_dev
> that is about to be freed.
>
> Use the platform data in the cleanup action too, and pass the struct
> device pointer directly to devm_add_action_or_reset(), so it always
> unregisters the slot that cros_ec_sensors_core_register() registered.
>
> Fixes: aa984f1ba4a4 ("iio: cros_ec: Register to cros_ec_sensorhub when EC supports FIFO")
> Signed-off-by: Satyam Gupta <sgsatyam@google.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Pass dev instead of pdev to devm_add_action_or_reset() and drop the
> unused pdev local variable (Tzung-Bi).
> - Move the note about out-of-tree triggers and how the issue was found
> below '---' (Tzung-Bi).
>
No, don't send a new version of a patch as a reply to the
previous version, it may break tooling like b4 for example.
--
Joshua Crofts
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 7:31 [PATCH] " Satyam Gupta
2026-11-05 10:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-05 13:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Satyam Gupta
2026-11-06 3:10 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-11-06 7:19 ` [PATCH v3] " Satyam Gupta
2026-11-06 9:22 ` Joshua Crofts [this message]
2026-11-06 17:41 ` Satyam Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261106102217.3bd67592@systembl0wer \
--to=crofts@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=eballetbo@kernel.org \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=sgsatyam@google.com \
--cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®