mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kyle Zeng <kylebot@openai.com>
To: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Cc: lucien.xin@gmail.com, marcelo.leitner@gmail.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v3] sctp: avoid requeueing pending control chunks
Date: Fri,  6 Nov 2026 19:05:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261107030532.32310-1-kylebot@openai.com> (raw)

The T4 and RE-CONFIG timeout handlers take a reference to their cached
control chunk and submit it through SCTP_CMD_REPLY. A previous
transmission can still be on the control outqueue when output is corked
or suppressed, or when sctp_packet_transmit_chunk() could not append the
chunk.

sctp_outq_tail() then adds the same list node a second time. Re-adding a
non-tail entry can corrupt the list without being caught by the
insertion-time list checks. A subsequent flush or association teardown
can access an already freed chunk. The ASCONF path is reproducible by an
unprivileged SCTP socket owner in a user/network namespace, with KASAN
reporting a use-after-free in __sctp_outq_teardown().

Check sctp_chunk_pending() in both timeout handlers before taking the
extra reference and issuing SCTP_CMD_REPLY. If the chunk is already
linked, leave the existing entry for normal output processing. Keep
the remaining timer and error-handling commands unchanged. This also
covers RE-CONFIG retransmission after sctp_assoc_rm_peer() moves the
request to another transport and starts its timer.

The issue was found by an LLM.

Fixes: 2e3216cd54b1 ("sctp: Follow security requirement of responding with 1 packet")
Fixes: 7b9438de0cd4 ("sctp: add stream reconf timer")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Suggested-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle Zeng <kylebot@openai.com>
---
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20261030042321.74407-1-kylebot@openai.com/
v2: Move the pending checks into the T4 and RE-CONFIG timeout handlers.
v3: Drop OUTQ_FLUSH and use the two pending checks as suggested. Leave
already-queued chunks for normal output processing.

I have a reproducer for this issue and can share by DM.

 net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 16 ++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
index b2f609f177fb..64519fd8f943 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
@@ -1122,9 +1122,11 @@ enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_send_reconf(struct net *net,
 		return SCTP_DISPOSITION_DELETE_TCB;
 	}
 
-	sctp_chunk_hold(asoc->strreset_chunk);
-	sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY,
-			SCTP_CHUNK(asoc->strreset_chunk));
+	if (!sctp_chunk_pending(asoc->strreset_chunk)) {
+		sctp_chunk_hold(asoc->strreset_chunk);
+		sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY,
+				SCTP_CHUNK(asoc->strreset_chunk));
+	}
 	sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_STRIKE, SCTP_TRANSPORT(transport));
 
 	return SCTP_DISPOSITION_CONSUME;
@@ -6197,9 +6199,11 @@ enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_t4_timer_expire(
 	 * chunk, it MUST be the same (including its serial number) as the last
 	 * ASCONF sent.
 	 */
-	sctp_chunk_hold(asoc->addip_last_asconf);
-	sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY,
-			SCTP_CHUNK(asoc->addip_last_asconf));
+	if (!sctp_chunk_pending(asoc->addip_last_asconf)) {
+		sctp_chunk_hold(asoc->addip_last_asconf);
+		sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_REPLY,
+				SCTP_CHUNK(asoc->addip_last_asconf));
+	}
 
 	/* ADDIP 4.1 B5) Restart the T-4 RTO timer. Note that if a different
 	 * destination is selected, then the RTO used will be that of the new

base-commit: 05441d697f7f9a927264f4058cbbc6a03dfcac9d
-- 
2.55.0.openai.911.g06873a30d2f3


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-11-07  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261107030532.32310-1-kylebot@openai.com \
    --to=kylebot@openai.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®