From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794109134; b=Bk7okmbzyRmF41R+hA0qLUdC9j/fNiqdRXxfA4/7Z0lIKlDPlInHeCFSJR4mZtu72ZLY jdk+PxpZB9DMfnbxn+Zp2eqZl/OQoNd4ouZIakY58+uBBJGWbv4gjZlN7dSF0MV2dzBIk RaJxeUslk/AIMnT99q06KzaRGhu7MOp2gdL//yl7lJdhfuOcIwvZk6urmCifWm2lsAI2a 537EqtBkH3uZ/++nNVO2LiDzzc1ck0OhSb7QevLeffwyyozsZPSvT/0MG2T6u2WVmmsPU n/ZFj1X662rhchqY89gry2ncy82DllEMCPXpQ/b4a+/1T8SE3PH9JlQUd+e0Y9/a0aQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794109134; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id: In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=aqIBkvYtPDzucqzURlNJHvsSFZfARn8ZXT0xMDf3Rh8=; b=3DwSCGUI7AAkBEK4MNWbmae/4RV0cIebK2L+JP1vUr/3KUTJ8z4ojaaxaoxlx0pjv9re PB1hz7uKheITc/J/+mP53Cjg6TKw7tW8+tNDhCD83awavf5BNLElGEmGAaVfU4BkaaZhs ucavBCKUbQ+Gn0rOoXU7rWRLzhuQ5H3dZUy8r+fEa2P1jNtOQuFI/FJ0FK6A7sYZ0/OeA KtP8+SjqqSzeM3bYj4nA+ZH48WON0NDso7u8A5bvK4v4oVCbz/T9jZARBu138m0ZkNAr8 jz+tqzh+AaTsRam9hSbfBdUNyXZRYpN1RPHWlnzX0rCOjYhLLhYsZeuSGI0FmbAkF9g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=afLoJzB1; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2689606A31A for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2026 03:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=afLoJzB1 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6D9D1F0089F; Sun, 8 Nov 2026 03:38:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1794109133; bh=aqIBkvYtPDzucqzURlNJHvsSFZfARn8ZXT0xMDf3Rh8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=afLoJzB1WJd62ZVIdjlUhcM4M+pnhm1CygxJ49d0Dh8W1jKx+sCyLJh9NKPaNiO4M 0jaeBPIufSpBUfQZeuzGXCgpF0Jznn4ssk1SD4r5xejfYLoNWxt0sA1g477AkjlHqv ZKUfkDSwJe6juqWXaGr0YlcQ5oMdoMR8D0XIJfKQ= Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 19:38:52 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Yuehong Wu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Breno Leitao , David Gow , Tejun Heo , Ryota Sakamoto , Karl Mehltretter , Marco Elver , Pasha Tatashin , Kir Chou , Lorenzo Stoakes , Borislav Petkov , Kuan-Wei Chiu , Petr Mladek , Eric Biggers , Guan-Chun Wu <409411716@gms.tku.edu.tw>, Andy Shevchenko , Geert Uytterhoeven , Dmitry Antipov , Thomas Maarseveen , Nickolai Zeldovich , Thomas Gleixner , Adam Harshbarger Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lib/tests: add KUnit tests for the priority sorted list (plist) Message-Id: <20261107193852.8320bdbf82cf6899c3153171@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20261108-plist-v3-tags-2-yuehongwu@cmss.chinamobile.com> References: <20261107-plist-kunit-v3-1-yuehongwu@cmss.chinamobile.com> <20261106230658.69acd5b571d1ee361cc2c849@linux-foundation.org> <20261108-plist-v3-tags-2-yuehongwu@cmss.chinamobile.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 08 Nov 2026 11:37:00 +0800 Yuehong Wu wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Geert pointed out that the Reported-by/Closes/Suggested-by tags in the > plist KUnit patch do not belong there, and I agree - they describe the > history of earlier revisions rather than an upstream bug. I am dropping > them. > > The copy in mm-nonmm-unstable currently carries them: do you prefer a v4 > with the tags removed, or would you rather edit the patch in place? There > is no code change either way. np, I edited in place. > For the record on the TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS question: I measured both > configurations on next-20261027 and saw exactly what Eric described - with > the test as a module the three exports stay in Module.symvers and > __ksymtab_plist_* is present in vmlinux; built into the kernel they are > trimmed, which is harmless. Yeah it's a pain and I see no general fix. # CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS is not set there.