mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ryan Prinz <rc4d5a@protonmail.com>
To: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@gmail.com>,
	Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ryan Prinz <rc4d5a@protonmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ieee802154: 6lowpan: validate fragment offset against datagram size
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2026 22:32:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261107223217.718177-1-rc4d5a@protonmail.com> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3342 bytes --]

A 6LoWPAN fragment announces the total size of the datagram it belongs
to (d_size) and its own offset within that datagram. The reassembly
code never checks that the offset actually fits inside d_size, so a
fragment claiming to start far past the end of the datagram is
accepted the same as a legitimate one, allowing an attacker to forge
data of another sender.

lowpan_frag_queue() considers a datagram complete by counting bytes
received (fq->q.meat) against the declared size (fq->q.len), not by
verifying the bytes form a contiguous range. A fragment with an
out-of-range offset still has its length counted toward that total, so
a legitimate fragment exchange plus an attacker fragment can sum to
d_size, marking the datagram complete while a gap in the data was
never filled, and appending the out-of-range fragment's bytes to the
end of the reassembled buffer as if they were part of the message.

IPv6's reassembly (net/ipv6/reassembly.c, ip6_frag_queue()) computes
end = of
fset + payload length for every fragment and checks end
against IPV6_MAXPLEN, which bounds offset by construction. 6LoWPAN's
d_offset and d_size are independent wire fields with no such coupling,
and no separate bounds check was added for it.

The same class of bug was assigned CVE-2019-8359 (CVSS 9.8) in
Contiki-NG's 6LoWPAN stack before a 2019 fix; RIOT-OS's implementation
(gnrc_sixlowpan_frag_rb_add) rejects a fragment once offset + size
exceeds the reassembly buffer's datagram_size. Linux's 6LoWPAN
reassembly is the only one of these implementations without an
equivalent check.

Fix by rejecting any fragment whose offset, or offset plus length,
falls outside [0, d_size).

Fixes: 7240cdec60b1 ("6lowpan: handling 6lowpan fragmentation via inet_frag api")
Signed-off-by: Ryan Prinz <rc4d5a@protonmail.com>
---
Reproduced two ways: with a local kernel module calling
lowpan_frag_rcv() directly, and over mac802154_hwsim with three
independent processes standing in for s
ender, receiver and attacker.
An attacker in radio range who observes one fragment of an
in-progress transmission reads d_tag, d_size and the addressing in the
clear, then sends a single out-of-range fragment of its own. The
receiver's reassembly completes with the attacker's bytes appended to
the legitimate data. Both reproducers were re-run against this fix to
confirm the out-of-range fragment is now rejected and the datagram no
longer completes with it included.

AI Disclosure: An AI assistant (Claude) was used to assist with the
analysis and testing. I have verified the vulnerability, the fix, and
the test results myself and take responsibility for this contribution,
per Documentation/process/coding-assistants.rst.

 net/ieee802154/6lowpan/reassembly.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/reassembly.c b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/reassembly.c
index ddb6a5817d09..905ba5f86844 100644
--- a/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/reassembly.c
++
+ b/net/ieee802154/6lowpan/reassembly.c
@@ -103,6 +103,9 @@ static int lowpan_frag_queue(struct lowpan_frag_queue *fq,
 	offset = lowpan_802154_cb(skb)->d_offset << 3;
 	end = lowpan_802154_cb(skb)->d_size;

+	if (offset > end || skb->len > end - offset)
+		goto err;
+
 	/* Is this the final fragment? */
 	if (offset + skb->len == end) {
 		/* If we already have some bits beyond end
--
2.51.2

[-- Attachment #1.2: publickey - rc4d5a@protonmail.com - 0xE775BF83.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 897 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 322 bytes --]

                 reply	other threads:[~2026-11-07 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261107223217.718177-1-rc4d5a@protonmail.com \
    --to=rc4d5a@protonmail.com \
    --cc=alex.aring@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefan@datenfreihafen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®