From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794118755; b=5LTKfOiyxolr7+SJi+cYvykdN04dmg/p0eZBbu8Fg6Y0xqH4k3Lpe5wLnA3uITx8L6pN z6+B8MRv7XSxCZR/Hp4n39tqi07++pZrzo7GCKVNFMjl9pPEUJ4Vx5+epy2zyfLvgTnCq vRkdFhoC81XF8+K//JoHD7qtYg/YbEIftOl5nUxhqX+3rlFd5+RV3vVemFZ51yFHJKesY yFRTYkYjB1aNk7/LpUjJZ8t4rDgIrEok8QVa940dzTt3KAp8kA1rqhLqKh2Q4Vj12IKGp 1eCRZzaO1CaEJwJpDFGBw3E/gnkeYpfa16uf/x+Q+MhvcV33AkC3h4fbGyuztrxFPnw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794118755; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:X-CSE-ConnectionGUID:X-CSE-MsgGUID: X-IronPort-AV:X-IronPort-AV:Received:X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: X-CSE-MsgGUID:X-ExtLoop1:X-IronPort-AV:Received:Received:Date:From:To: Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=bSKNeRhoYj51dd326u4b+S/qwJ1yJgRLl0Pp5aorhH0=; b=cNL1/yYibT/uQq4XkkwqOGGPbnA4CXMmL50Iud7PRSO6XR7E/nsiINfYtlW3dReJ8/E8 5bRiqWlhNS8RAE4vWpx7oWWjw9VjrXPtVQOA8Mpw1m110YhVAQYmOUlC0KuoqLaRt3/O2 KMiiLRz5z9pHtAGdv5LSrswFiOqbbWmPnIPF6Rdcwl6lpvvaEKBaJOVeEoxtA8OUf5+gj qm3RTD5zI0TQyVTX2gcj5iE8v2JrDEIHx4oFZ4POUabOxG14RorBgDlYOgfPfqUMvu8bo 3JUaxZpBhmPy8X4wPkIGoT7KH1JhgfCn5bVDzvP9AUgEbr/po3EIS2erCzo0RkRPEIQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=Mpjf5xeQ; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=192.198.163.10 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0223F606A321; Sun, 8 Nov 2026 06:19:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 0223F606A321 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=Mpjf5xeQ DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1794118754; x=1825654754; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=pLWtdzulAJWXAefk0jF40+RB4tS7wf4qyhp071KtEyw=; b=Mpjf5xeQmK8iyKTyMMBmhL8gj5cZ2dSEXHXwc8gptAuAvQSaGGy7YQux ZjkUHfnVb93aUPs3CjdAFeccr/jzo5PtdMWZG6tm8i6PIGMVQveCbFCaV AeLMET/49ORtmzyxBqxHd+5Cb3F3vcHDwyeo3U5n0ffKPwEwPWuWM34kg 06chDx1Lmt30MPON3jne9T5VYsWT2WirNDRouMgpon7vjFeMfU0xqn1aj 5+nOAWAlwtJnIq9DXiPjCxtmmeht5o7ZjO7IOfv9FD0fqa2CryFZadeb0 uC2qAhFp6f6EZy+4vT7W004lyKqbFPuLK1hl+wgiKxYU3lZg9LhnK1eYS w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5llcEsjzRYiDDjMJYfOisQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: W8xOjwGlS9ibRyTagDZ1Dw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11959"; a="2779944" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,200,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="2779944" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Nov 2026 22:19:13 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: f4exIxHnQQ2lp12beg0EPg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 38M9y+PyQvqsqXa8cqYT4Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,200,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="7738434" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 0caa9d2d175c) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2026 22:19:10 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 0caa9d2d175c with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1xPwF9-00000000sGZ-0Dno; Sun, 08 Nov 2026 06:19:07 +0000 Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2026 14:18:39 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Tim Michals , Jassi Brar , Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tim Michals Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] remoteproc: sunxi: Add KUnit tests Message-ID: <202611081401.aakRznh0-lkp@intel.com> References: <20261101185735.762559-8-tcmichals@gmail.com> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261101185735.762559-8-tcmichals@gmail.com> Hi Tim, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on 7649ba73f9e7e1e04d0b46213e39c79ae09dd55c] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tim-Michals/dt-bindings-mailbox-Add-Allwinner-A523-message-box/20261101-125729 base: 7649ba73f9e7e1e04d0b46213e39c79ae09dd55c patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261101185735.762559-8-tcmichals%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v3 7/7] remoteproc: sunxi: Add KUnit tests config: s390-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261108/202611081401.aakRznh0-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 24.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project fc9576e3b179738d99c5babe5cd9d6c1f883e0db) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261108/202611081401.aakRznh0-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202611081401.aakRznh0-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:962:58: error: no member named 'usage_count' in 'struct dev_pm_info' 962 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 0); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/kunit/test.h:1034:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL) | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1039:8: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG' 1039 | left, ==, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:874:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION' 874 | left, op, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:840:15: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ >> drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:962:58: error: no member named 'usage_count' in 'struct dev_pm_info' 962 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 0); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/kunit/test.h:1034:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL) | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1039:8: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG' 1039 | left, ==, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:874:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION' 874 | left, op, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:840:31: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:977:58: error: no member named 'usage_count' in 'struct dev_pm_info' 977 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 1); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/kunit/test.h:1034:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL) | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1039:8: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG' 1039 | left, ==, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:874:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION' 874 | left, op, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:840:15: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:977:58: error: no member named 'usage_count' in 'struct dev_pm_info' 977 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 1); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/kunit/test.h:1034:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL) | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1039:8: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG' 1039 | left, ==, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:874:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION' 874 | left, op, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:840:31: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:1107:48: error: no member named 'usage_count' in 'struct dev_pm_info' 1107 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count), 0); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/kunit/test.h:1034:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL) | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1039:8: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG' 1039 | left, ==, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:874:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION' 874 | left, op, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:840:15: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:1107:48: error: no member named 'usage_count' in 'struct dev_pm_info' 1107 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count), 0); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/kunit/test.h:1034:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL) | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1039:8: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG' 1039 | left, ==, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:874:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION' 874 | left, op, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:840:31: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ 6 errors generated. vim +962 drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c 949 950 /* Everything as before prepare(): resets asserted, clocks off, no PM reference */ 951 static void expect_powered_off(struct kunit *test, struct test_context *ctx, 952 struct mock_providers *mp, bool core_held) 953 { 954 int i; 955 956 KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, mp->asserted[RST_CFG]); 957 KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, mp->asserted[RST_SRAM]); 958 KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, mp->asserted[RST_DEBUG]); 959 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mp->asserted[RST_CORE], core_held); 960 for (i = 0; i < NR_CLK; i++) 961 KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE_MSG(test, clk_hw_is_prepared(&mp->clk[i].hw), "clock %d", i); > 962 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 0); 963 } 964 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki