From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Nico Pache <nico.pache@linux.dev>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>,
Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@linux.dev>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>,
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] mm/huge_memory: prevent losing PG_waiters in __split_folio_to_order()
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 14:32:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261109-fix-split_folio_to_order-race-v3-1-1cdc509e34be@nvidia.com> (raw)
__split_folio_to_order() calls prep_compound_page() on each new head page
to create a compound page after clear_compound_head(). prep_compound_page()
uses non atomic __SetPageHead(). It is mostly OK, since the folio is locked
and frozen and no one else is supposed to modify the folio's flags.
However, code calling migration_entry_wait() can reach the folio by PFN,
then access its flags. It is because softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() used
by migration_entry_wait() sets PG_waiters concurrently without taking a
reference and the frozen refcount during split cannot block it. Meanwhile,
__SetPageHead() does a plain read and write, so PG_waiters atomically set
by softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() will be lost if the set happens after
__SetPageHead()'s read and before its write.
One example code interleaving:
CPU0: __split_folio_to_order(new_order>0) CPU1: do_swap_page()
1. clear_compound_head(new_head)
new_head->compound_info = 0
(page_folio(new_head) == new_head now)
2. migration_entry_wait()
softleaf_to_folio(entry)
page_folio() -> new_head
(not the old head any more)
3. prep_compound_page(new_head, new_order)
__SetPageHead(new_head)
tmp = new_head->flags.f <-- load; PG_waiters == 0 in tmp
4. folio_set_waiters(new_head)
set_bit(PG_waiters, &flags.f)
enqueue on waitqueue, sleep
5. new_head->flags.f = tmp | (1UL << PG_head)
<-- store; overwrites step 4, PG_waiters == 0 again
Later, folio_unlock(new_folio) sees no PG_waiters, skips folio_wake_bit(),
and CPU1 can remain blocked indefinitely.
Fix it by setting PG_head along with other flags in new_folio->flags before
smp_wmb() and clear_compound_head(). The remaining compound page metadata
is set after clear_compound_head(). In that way, after
clear_compound_head() makes new_folio visible, nothing overwrites the
PG_waiters from softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() by modifying
new_folio->flags non-atomically.
While at it, use data_race() to suppress the KCSAN issue reported by Ye
Liu's patch (the second Closes) on reading ->flags during a folio split.
Suggested-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
Reported-by: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/DMHE8BEEER1H.2BIY52NXATPIA@nvidia.com/
Reported-by: Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261029-data_race_huge_mem-v1-1-112e331291c1@linux.dev/
Fixes: c010d47f107f6 ("mm: thp: split huge page to any lower order pages")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
---
The issue was raised by David when reviewing Ye Liu's "mm/huge_memory: use
READ_ONCE() when cloning folio flags during split" [1]. This patch also
supersedes Ye Liu's patch.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261029-data_race_huge_mem-v1-1-112e331291c1@linux.dev/
---
Changes in v3:
- set PG_head before smp_wmb() like Kiryl suggested instead of
prep_compound_page_atomic().
- used data_race() to suppress KCSAN reports while at it.
- dropped Lorenzo's ack, since the patch is changed.
- Link to v2: https://patch.msgid.link/20261106-fix-split_folio_to_order-race-v2-1-1b59c67b8af3@nvidia.com
Changes in v2:
- renamed __prep_compound_head_and_tail() to __prep_compound_page().
- added comments to prep_compound_page() and __prep_compound_page().
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20261029-fix-split_folio_to_order-race-v1-1-a483c7451b0d@nvidia.com
---
mm/huge_memory.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
mm/internal.h | 2 ++
mm/page_alloc.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index bd44d58e86845..99b48d7c988db 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -3714,6 +3714,7 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
* Don't pass it around before clear_compound_head().
*/
struct folio *new_folio = (struct folio *)new_head;
+ memdesc_flags_t new_flags;
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(atomic_read(&new_folio->_mapcount) != -1, new_head);
@@ -3730,8 +3731,16 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
* unreferenced sub-pages of an anonymous THP: we can simply drop
* PG_anon_exclusive (-> PG_mappedtodisk) for these here.
*/
- new_folio->flags.f &= ~PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP;
- new_folio->flags.f |= (folio->flags.f &
+ /*
+ * ->flags are stable since the folio is locked and frozen.
+ * data_race() is used because reference-less writers,
+ * 1. PG_waiters from softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() and
+ * 2. PG_hwpoison from memory_failure(),
+ * can still write to it.
+ */
+ new_flags.f = data_race(new_folio->flags.f) & ~PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP;
+ /* See above for data_race() use */
+ new_flags.f |= data_race(folio->flags.f) &
((1L << PG_referenced) |
(1L << PG_swapbacked) |
(1L << PG_swapcache) |
@@ -3749,7 +3758,18 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
#endif
(1L << PG_dirty) |
(1L << PG_dropbehind) |
- LRU_GEN_MASK | LRU_REFS_MASK));
+ LRU_GEN_MASK | LRU_REFS_MASK);
+
+ /*
+ * Set PG_head before smp_wmb() like other flags.
+ * After clear_compound_head(), when new_head is recognized as
+ * a folio, softleaf_entry_wait_on_locked() can set PG_waiters
+ * on it without taking a reference and modifying flags
+ * non-atomically can lose it.
+ */
+ if (new_order)
+ new_flags.f |= 1L << PG_head;
+ WRITE_ONCE(new_folio->flags.f, new_flags.f);
new_folio->mapping = folio->mapping;
new_folio->index = folio->index + i;
@@ -3779,7 +3799,11 @@ static void __split_folio_to_order(struct folio *folio, int old_order,
*/
clear_compound_head(new_head);
if (new_order) {
- prep_compound_page(new_head, new_order);
+ /*
+ * PG_head is set above, so only set up the remaining
+ * metadata on head page and tail pages.
+ */
+ __prep_compound_page(new_head, new_order);
folio_set_large_rmappable(new_folio);
}
diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index aeebb3e49ed11..4ce67ce2f3fba 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -807,6 +807,8 @@ static inline void prep_compound_tail(struct page *tail,
VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(tail->private);
}
+void __prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order);
+
#if defined CONFIG_COMPACTION || defined CONFIG_CMA
/*
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 143776e671abb..e2a8092ff0b4f 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -682,18 +682,31 @@ static inline bool pcp_allowed_order(unsigned int order)
* This usage means that zero-order pages may not be compound.
*/
-void prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
+/*
+ * Set up the metadata on head page and tail pages.
+ * Caller also needs to set PG_head.
+ */
+void __prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
{
int i;
int nr_pages = 1 << order;
- __SetPageHead(page);
for (i = 1; i < nr_pages; i++)
prep_compound_tail(page + i, page, order);
prep_compound_head(page, order);
}
+/*
+ * PG_head is set non-atomically. It should be used when no one else can modify
+ * @page's flags.
+ */
+void prep_compound_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
+{
+ __SetPageHead(page);
+ __prep_compound_page(page, order);
+}
+
static inline void set_buddy_order(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
{
set_page_private(page, order);
---
base-commit: d865f2677c44cb2171b833d6775cf692756fa8be
change-id: 20261029-fix-split_folio_to_order-race-087a2a9fbf7c
Best regards,
--
Yan, Zi
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 19:32 Zi Yan [this message]
2026-11-09 20:21 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261109-fix-split_folio_to_order-race-v3-1-1cdc509e34be@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brendan.jackman@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=ye.liu@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®