From: lirongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Subject: [PATCH,net-next,v2] af_unix: Fix wrong socket tested in the symmetric half of unix_state_lock_cmp_fn().
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 17:20:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261109092016.2082-1-lirongqing@baidu.com> (raw)
From: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
The second half of unix_state_lock_cmp_fn() mirrors the first with a and b
swapped, but it tests b->sk.sk_state again. Since b is already known to be
TCP_LISTEN, the switch only hits default and always returns 0 ("no order
known") instead of 1. Test a's state instead, as the first half does.
This code is only built with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, so the impact is limited
to lockdep failing to validate this unix_state_lock() nesting order.
Found by AI.
Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
---
Diff with v1: target to net-next, and drop fix tag
net/unix/af_unix.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index e7a0582..501e693 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static int unix_state_lock_cmp_fn(const struct lockdep_map *_a,
/* Should never happen. Just to be symmetric. */
if (b->sk.sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
- switch (b->sk.sk_state) {
+ switch (a->sk.sk_state) {
case TCP_CLOSE:
case TCP_ESTABLISHED:
return 1;
--
2.9.4
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 9:20 lirongqing [this message]
2026-11-10 6:21 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261109092016.2082-1-lirongqing@baidu.com \
--to=lirongqing@baidu.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®