From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=115.124.30.118 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794226921; b=E3uwntin4E8Zl07POUqMKAxq2W5J4ZbfewO/rIwIwsrc+RpQCCFkyHl7jMQoCxto/ucD kDEZEIH+be0ruThYwyXU+FffrYe0zItwyRFJo0iZJNEo6zSarJ74mBsp2nR05yhF1p2eH gkisKkQfbouKN4uKtrpPJ0fK12KKxuMfjdlJbKilXht3HufmhCl7c4kfnMip+bHlUUE2L lw7GddmRhMRxR8rMFNhdrhsWzQbILgY29t2a44iJoBF8F+vwILI86HKV0VfWNH647LRM+ EJJiXRxUFSm5Lw94oxyNDJGyxY7VnbTKklmpymemR7ygOzQCNTCZSAcx7MikmD4U+lA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794226921; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:X-Alimail-AntiSpam:Received:From:To:Cc: Subject:Date:Message-Id:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=q1LX/Zzu5lJJ68i8CdUH/dCh4TP/qblPJOfMfJ1EhqU=; b=gdiiMJMUDINyNy8mylxQ+LyOV735xxLp7eCWonnJ7Siq65pwkx91inWn0LaUG50ImzpO vd6UIdqOuR9vXFQKsLVVpzPrcnhZejQ25S5TfnyG4dSV5vgdILsyNqdWPPv1NQ6gWl6hf sAxobXGv1DKqpyW3UdV2fqi7tEy2iubKjeS+UU2tzR2LJ7gvPIkQclhpH+Z4gGMrqGouc zAf3lY6Mn4R675oA0Joyw9+BuvCgZXwKhrergMuy8MPXjEG01mX24U3MKRXQBgHctiA+4 EApB9GEIl7WqiDOb2x8XjyZS/bkkPd/hbuOG+4RKfGAyxkTKmtGsAbt4oRByQ4W+oKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=WXz65qFo; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=115.124.30.118 Received: from out30-118.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-118.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.118]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77DD9606D81B for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2026 12:22:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 77DD9606D81B Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=WXz65qFo DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1794226912; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; bh=q1LX/Zzu5lJJ68i8CdUH/dCh4TP/qblPJOfMfJ1EhqU=; b=WXz65qFohtXHLG4f708nOooUfMYr4RjrG3F59nXD4UmShEChj9oyM9RaIewhCaOHgC+J3OxJOw5Eox3jgo6xK9LXFKfPq3nABOC3ULQBNLYUk3kEIKX83n7D4u+ADPM6EaxvUMYMwgtXB2NMGJ0Uyw9c2PAxBCmLcgrsJjbUnAE= X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R151e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=maildocker-contentspam033045098064;MF=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=7;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0XEP8aqD_1794226911; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0XEP8aqD_1794226911 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Mon, 09 Nov 2026 20:21:51 +0800 From: Joseph Qi To: Andrew Morton , Heming Zhao Cc: Mark Fasheh , Joel Becker , ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joseph Qi Subject: [PATCH v3 04/31] ocfs2: abstract the dinode OCFS2_VALID_FL check Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 20:20:54 +0800 Message-Id: <20261109122121.21473-5-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.3 In-Reply-To: <20261109122121.21473-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20261109122121.21473-1-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The test for a dinode without OCFS2_VALID_FL is open-coded three times, and the two spellings have already drifted apart: the normal validator uses le32_to_cpu(di->i_flags) & OCFS2_VALID_FL while filecheck and repair use di->i_flags & cpu_to_le32(OCFS2_VALID_FL). Fold them into one predicate using the le32_to_cpu() form. Byteswapping is a bit permutation, so both spellings test the same on-disk bit on either endianness. The BUG_ON() in ocfs2_populate_inode() is left alone; it asserts an invariant the validator has already established rather than validating on-disk state. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi --- fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c index 587fcea59f5a..8b4652002ae2 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c @@ -87,6 +87,11 @@ static bool ocfs2_dinode_has_wrong_blkno(struct ocfs2_dinode *di, u64 blkno) return le64_to_cpu(di->i_blkno) != blkno; } +static bool ocfs2_dinode_has_no_valid_flag(struct ocfs2_dinode *di) +{ + return !(le32_to_cpu(di->i_flags) & OCFS2_VALID_FL); +} + static bool ocfs2_valid_inode_mode(umode_t mode) { return fs_umode_to_ftype(mode) != FT_UNKNOWN; @@ -1530,7 +1535,7 @@ int ocfs2_validate_inode_block(struct super_block *sb, goto bail; } - if (!(le32_to_cpu(di->i_flags) & OCFS2_VALID_FL)) { + if (ocfs2_dinode_has_no_valid_flag(di)) { rc = ocfs2_error(sb, "Invalid dinode #%llu: OCFS2_VALID_FL not set\n", (unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr); @@ -1854,7 +1859,7 @@ static int ocfs2_filecheck_validate_inode_block(struct super_block *sb, goto bail; } - if (!(di->i_flags & cpu_to_le32(OCFS2_VALID_FL))) { + if (ocfs2_dinode_has_no_valid_flag(di)) { mlog(ML_ERROR, "Filecheck: invalid dinode #%llu: OCFS2_VALID_FL " "not set\n", @@ -1943,7 +1948,7 @@ static int ocfs2_filecheck_repair_inode_block(struct super_block *sb, return -OCFS2_FILECHECK_ERR_INVALIDINO; } - if (!(di->i_flags & cpu_to_le32(OCFS2_VALID_FL))) { + if (ocfs2_dinode_has_no_valid_flag(di)) { /* Cannot just add VALID_FL flag back as a fix, * need more things to check here. */ -- 2.39.3