From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Kalle Niemi <kaleposti@gmail.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: driver-core@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 1/4] bus: simple-pm-bus: Avoid inconsistencies between probe() and remove()
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 15:08:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261109140916.90625-2-herve.codina@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109140916.90625-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com>
At probe(), operations done depends on device_has_driver_override().
At remove() a call to device_has_driver_override() is also present to
identify operations that need to be done in order to revert operations
previously done at probe().
Nothing prevents device_has_driver_override() to return a different
value when called at probe() and when called at remove(). Indeed, a user
can set driver_override (or clear it) after the probe() call and before
the remove() call.
In that case, inconsistencies are present between pm_runtime_enable()
called at probe() and pm_runtime_disable() called at remove().
In order to ensure that pm_runtime_disable() is called only if
pm_runtime_enable() has been called at probe(), use the devres version
of pm_runtime_enable().
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260630105701.7D0471F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org/
Fixes: 98e96cf80045 ("drivers: bus: simple-pm-bus: Add support for probing simple bus only devices")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
---
drivers/bus/simple-pm-bus.c | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bus/simple-pm-bus.c b/drivers/bus/simple-pm-bus.c
index c920bd6fbaaf..4322a778e801 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/simple-pm-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/simple-pm-bus.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ static int simple_pm_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
const struct of_device_id *match;
struct simple_pm_bus *bus;
+ int ret;
/*
* Allow user to use driver_override to bind this driver to a
@@ -66,7 +67,9 @@ static int simple_pm_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
- pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
+ ret = devm_pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
+ if (ret)
+ return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "failed enable pm_runtime\n");
if (np)
of_platform_populate(np, NULL, lookup, &pdev->dev);
@@ -76,14 +79,7 @@ static int simple_pm_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
static void simple_pm_bus_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- const void *data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
-
- if (device_has_driver_override(&pdev->dev) || data)
- return;
-
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
-
- pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
}
static int simple_pm_bus_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
--
2.56.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 14:08 [PATCH v9 0/4] lan966x pci device: Add support for SFPs, simple-bus part Herve Codina
2026-11-09 14:08 ` Herve Codina [this message]
2026-11-09 14:08 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] bus: simple-pm-bus: Remove the remove() function Herve Codina
2026-11-09 14:08 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] bus: simple-pm-bus: Remove child devices when the bus is unbound Herve Codina
2026-11-09 14:08 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] bus: simple-pm-bus: Populate child nodes at probe Herve Codina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261109140916.90625-2-herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--to=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.machon@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=kaleposti@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®