From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: "Ridong Chen" <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Guopeng Zhang <guopeng.zhang@linux.dev>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] cgroup/cpuset: Fix incorrect partition invalidation logic in cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks()
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 11:09:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261109160912.1369897-3-longman@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109160912.1369897-1-longman@redhat.com>
When most of the active CPUs of a system are allocated to
sub-partitions below the top_cpuset partition, it is possible that a
CPU offline operation may remove the last active CPU in the top_cpuset
partition. When that really happens, cpuset_handle_hotplug() will clear
the subpartitions_cpus to make sure active CPUs are present in the top
partition and let the other sub-partitions get invalidated and then
competes for their exclusive CPUs again.
In cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(), the current code use
"cpumask_empty(subpartitions_cpus)" to determine if that partition
should be invalidated. That is fine if there is only one sub-partition.
As reported by sashiko that when there are more than one sub-partitions
and the first sub-partition will get invalidated and then it will
try to acquire the exclusive CPUs and become valid again. When this
happens, the subpartitions_cpus will no longer be empty. The remaining
sub-partitions will assume their exclusive CPUs are safe and proceed
as normal. As a result, active CPUs owned by those sub-partitions
remain in both top_cpuset.effective_cpus and the sub-partitions'
effective_cpus while missing from subpartitions_cpus, breaking partition
CPU exclusivity and triggering WARN_ON_ONCE() in generate_sched_domains()
and remote_partition_disable().
Fix that by checking if the sub-partitions' effective_xcpus are subset
of subpartitions_cpus to determine if they should be invalidated.
Fixes: 0c7f293efc87 ("cgroup/cpuset: Add cpuset.cpus.exclusive.effective for v2")
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-bf69cd3c-833a-4599-a1f9-8dd9e044cd7c
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
---
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 40e7d33847f7..e8169b739454 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -4002,9 +4002,9 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
if (!tmp || !cs->partition_root_state)
goto update_tasks;
- if (is_remote_partition(cs) && (cpumask_empty(subpartitions_cpus) ||
- (cpumask_empty(&new_cpus) &&
- partition_is_populated(cs, NULL)))) {
+ if (is_remote_partition(cs) &&
+ (!cpumask_subset(cs->effective_xcpus, subpartitions_cpus) ||
+ (cpumask_empty(&new_cpus) && partition_is_populated(cs, NULL)))) {
WRITE_ONCE(cs->prs_err, PERR_HOTPLUG);
remote_partition_disable(cs, tmp);
compute_effective_cpumask(&new_cpus, cs, parent);
@@ -4021,7 +4021,7 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp)
if (is_local_partition(cs) &&
(!is_partition_valid(parent) ||
tasks_nocpu_error(parent, cs, &new_cpus) ||
- cpumask_empty(subpartitions_cpus)))
+ !cpumask_subset(cs->effective_xcpus, subpartitions_cpus)))
partcmd = partcmd_invalidate;
/*
* On the other hand, an invalid partition root may be transitioned
--
2.56.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 16:09 [PATCH 0/5] cgroup/cpuset: More fix patches Waiman Long
2026-11-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 1/5] selftests/cgroup: Fix "test_cpuset_prs.sh -v" failures Waiman Long
2026-11-09 16:09 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2026-11-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 3/5] cgroup/cpuset: Protect current->mems_allowed read in cpuset_fork() Waiman Long
2026-11-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 4/5] cgroup/cpuset: Correctly set cpus_updated in cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks() Waiman Long
2026-11-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 5/5] cgroup/cpuset: Correctly set isolated_cpus when switching partition state Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261109160912.1369897-3-longman@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guopeng.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®