From: Yuri Andriaccio <yurand2000@gmail.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Ben Segall" <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"K Prateek Nayak" <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
Yuri Andriaccio <yuri.andriaccio@santannapisa.it>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v7 12/29] sched/deadline: Account rt-cgroups bandwidth in deadline tasks schedulability tests.
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 17:35:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261109163616.195264-13-yurand2000@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109163616.195264-1-yurand2000@gmail.com>
From: luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
Account the rt-cgroups hierarchy's reserved bandwidth in the
schedulability test of deadline entities. This mechanism allows to
completely reserve portion of the rt-bandwidth to rt-cgroups even if
they do not use all of it.
Account for the rt-cgroups' reserved bandwidth also when changing the
total dedicated bandwidth for real time tasks.
Co-developed-by: Alessio Balsini <a.balsini@sssup.it>
Signed-off-by: Alessio Balsini <a.balsini@sssup.it>
Co-developed-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Yuri Andriaccio <yurand2000@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuri Andriaccio <yurand2000@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index b6b5fcb15f43..7c2f4d2c9301 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -127,14 +127,17 @@ static inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i)
return &cpu_rq(i)->rd->dl_bw;
}
-static inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i)
+static inline int __dl_bw_cpus(const struct cpumask *mask)
{
- struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(i)->rd;
+ return cpumask_weight_and(mask, cpu_active_mask);
+}
+static inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i)
+{
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
"sched RCU must be held");
- return cpumask_weight_and(rd->span, cpu_active_mask);
+ return __dl_bw_cpus(cpu_rq(i)->rd->span);
}
static inline unsigned long __dl_bw_capacity(const struct cpumask *mask)
@@ -205,11 +208,25 @@ void __dl_add(struct dl_bw *dl_b, u64 tsk_bw, int cpus)
__dl_update(dl_b, -((s32)tsk_bw / cpus));
}
+static inline u64 get_dl_groups_bw(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED
+ const struct dl_bandwidth *dl_b;
+
+ guard(raw_spinlock_irqsave)(dl_bw_lock_of_tg(&root_task_group));
+ dl_b = dl_bandwidth_read(&root_task_group);
+ return to_ratio(dl_b->dl_period, dl_b->dl_runtime);
+#else
+ return 0;
+#endif
+}
+
static inline bool
-__dl_overflow(struct dl_bw *dl_b, unsigned long cap, u64 old_bw, u64 new_bw)
+__dl_overflow(struct dl_bw *dl_b, unsigned long cap, int cpus, u64 old_bw, u64 new_bw)
{
return dl_b->bw != -1 &&
- cap_scale(dl_b->bw, cap) < dl_b->total_bw - old_bw + new_bw;
+ cap_scale(dl_b->bw, cap) < dl_b->total_bw - old_bw + new_bw
+ + get_dl_groups_bw() * cpus;
}
static inline
@@ -1937,7 +1954,7 @@ int dl_server_apply_params(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, u64 runtime, u64 perio
cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
cap = dl_bw_capacity(cpu);
- if (__dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, old_bw, new_bw))
+ if (__dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, cpus, old_bw, new_bw))
return -EBUSY;
if (init) {
@@ -1984,7 +2001,7 @@ static int __dl_server_attach_bw_locked(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
*/
if (cpu_active(cpu_of(rq))) {
cap = dl_bw_capacity(cpu_of(rq));
- if (__dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, 0, dl_se->dl_bw))
+ if (__dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, cpus, 0, dl_se->dl_bw))
return -EBUSY;
__dl_add(dl_b, dl_se->dl_bw, cpus);
}
@@ -3710,8 +3727,9 @@ int sched_dl_global_validate(void)
u64 period = global_rt_period();
u64 new_bw = to_ratio(period, runtime);
u64 cookie = ++dl_cookie;
+ u64 dl_groups_root = get_dl_groups_bw();
struct dl_bw *dl_b;
- int cpu, cpus, ret = 0;
+ int cpu, cap, cpus, ret = 0;
unsigned long flags;
/*
@@ -3726,10 +3744,12 @@ int sched_dl_global_validate(void)
goto next;
dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu);
+ cap = dl_bw_capacity(cpu);
cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
- if (new_bw * cpus < dl_b->total_bw)
+ if (cap_scale(new_bw, cap) < dl_b->total_bw +
+ dl_groups_root * cpus)
ret = -EBUSY;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags);
@@ -3823,13 +3843,13 @@ int sched_dl_overflow(struct task_struct *p, int policy,
cap = dl_bw_capacity(cpu);
if (dl_policy(policy) && !task_has_dl_policy(p) &&
- !__dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, 0, new_bw)) {
+ !__dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, cpus, 0, new_bw)) {
if (hrtimer_active(&p->dl.inactive_timer))
__dl_sub(dl_b, p->dl.dl_bw, cpus);
__dl_add(dl_b, new_bw, cpus);
err = 0;
} else if (dl_policy(policy) && task_has_dl_policy(p) &&
- !__dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, p->dl.dl_bw, new_bw)) {
+ !__dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, cpus, p->dl.dl_bw, new_bw)) {
/*
* XXX this is slightly incorrect: when the task
* utilization decreases, we should delay the total
@@ -4007,13 +4027,14 @@ int dl_cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink(const struct cpumask *cur,
{
unsigned long flags, cap;
struct dl_bw *cur_dl_b;
- int ret = 1;
+ int cpus, ret = 1;
rcu_read_lock_sched();
cur_dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpumask_any(cur));
cap = __dl_bw_capacity(trial);
+ cpus = __dl_bw_cpus(trial);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cur_dl_b->lock, flags);
- if (__dl_overflow(cur_dl_b, cap, 0, 0))
+ if (__dl_overflow(cur_dl_b, cap, cpus, 0, 0))
ret = 0;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cur_dl_b->lock, flags);
rcu_read_unlock_sched();
@@ -4030,6 +4051,7 @@ enum dl_bw_request {
static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_request req, int cpu, u64 dl_bw)
{
unsigned long flags, cap;
+ int cpus;
struct dl_bw *dl_b;
bool overflow = 0;
u64 dl_server_bw = 0;
@@ -4039,12 +4061,13 @@ static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_request req, int cpu, u64 dl_bw)
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags);
cap = dl_bw_capacity(cpu);
+ cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu);
switch (req) {
case dl_bw_req_free:
__dl_sub(dl_b, dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(cpu));
break;
case dl_bw_req_alloc:
- overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, 0, dl_bw);
+ overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, cpus, 0, dl_bw);
if (!overflow) {
/*
@@ -4053,7 +4076,7 @@ static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_request req, int cpu, u64 dl_bw)
* We will free resources in the source root_domain
* later on (see set_cpus_allowed_dl()).
*/
- __dl_add(dl_b, dl_bw, dl_bw_cpus(cpu));
+ __dl_add(dl_b, dl_bw, cpus);
}
break;
case dl_bw_req_deactivate:
@@ -4063,6 +4086,7 @@ static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_request req, int cpu, u64 dl_bw)
* turn cpu off?).
*/
cap -= arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
+ cpus -= 1;
/*
* cpu is going offline and NORMAL and EXT tasks will be
@@ -4083,8 +4107,8 @@ static int dl_bw_manage(enum dl_bw_request req, int cpu, u64 dl_bw)
* wise thing to do. As said above, cpu is not offline
* yet, so account for that.
*/
- if (dl_bw_cpus(cpu) - 1)
- overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, dl_server_bw, 0);
+ if (cpus)
+ overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cap, cpus, dl_server_bw, 0);
else
overflow = 1;
}
--
2.56.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 16:35 [RFC PATCH v7 00/29] Hierarchical Constant Bandwidth Server Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v7 01/29] sched/deadline: Introduce dl_freq_invariant flag for fair/ext servers Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v7 02/29] sched/deadline: Do not access dl_se->rq directly Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v7 03/29] sched/deadline: Distinguish between dl_rq and my_q Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v7 04/29] sched/rt: Pass an rt_rq instead of an rq where needed Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v7 05/29] sched/rt: Move functions from rt.c to sched.h Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v7 06/29] sched/rt: Disable RT_GROUP_SCHED Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v7 07/29] sched/rt: Remove unnecessary runqueue pointer in struct rt_rq Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v7 08/29] sched/rt: Introduce HCBS specific structs in task_group Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v7 09/29] sched/core: Initialize HCBS specific structures Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v7 10/29] sched/deadline: Add dl_init_tg Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v7 11/29] sched/rt: Add {alloc/unregister/free}_rt_sched_group Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:35 ` Yuri Andriaccio [this message]
2026-11-09 16:35 ` [RFC PATCH v7 13/29] sched/rt: Implement dl-server operations for rt-cgroups Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v7 14/29] sched/rt: Update task event callbacks for HCBS scheduling Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v7 15/29] sched/rt: Remove support for cgroups-v1 Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v7 16/29] sched/rt: Update rt-cgroup schedulability checks Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v7 17/29] sched/rt: Update task's RT runqueue when switching scheduling class Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v7 18/29] sched/rt: Remove old RT_GROUP_SCHED data structures Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v7 19/29] sched/rt: Add HCBS migration code to related functions Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v7 20/29] sched/rt: Hook HCBS migration functions Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v7 21/29] sched/core: Execute enqueued balance callbacks when changing allowed CPUs Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v7 22/29] sched/rt: Try pull task on empty server pick Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v7 23/29] sched/core: Execute enqueued balance callbacks after migrate_disable_switch Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v7 24/29] sched/syscalls: Allow unpriviledged tasks to set RT priority inside cgroups Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v7 25/29] sched/rt: Enable HRTICK_DL for HCBS servers Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v7 26/29] Documentation: Update documentation for real-time cgroups Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v7 27/29] sched/rt: Integrate cpuset and cpu controllers Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v7 28/29] sched/rt: Prevent CPU offline operation on active rt-cgroups Yuri Andriaccio
2026-11-09 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH v7 29/29] sched/rt: Introduce multi-cpu support Yuri Andriaccio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261109163616.195264-13-yurand2000@gmail.com \
--to=yurand2000@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yuri.andriaccio@santannapisa.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®