mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
To: palmer@dabbelt.com, pjw@kernel.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu
Cc: alex@ghiti.fr, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, oleg@redhat.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	namhyung@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	james.clark@linaro.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org, jikos@kernel.org,
	mbenes@suse.cz, pmladek@suse.com, joe.lawrence@redhat.com,
	shuah@kernel.org, mpdesouza@suse.com, martin@kaiser.cx,
	kmehltretter@gmail.com, oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com,
	zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com, xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com,
	jkchen@linux.alibaba.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 02/10] riscv: Add KUnit test for stack trace start frames
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 09:37:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261110013750.36800-3-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110013750.36800-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>

From: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>

stack_trace_save() and return_address() depend on the first frame reported
by arch_stack_walk(), but no test checks their frame numbering.

Add a test that calls both through a chain of three noinline functions
and compares the symbol of the result with the function expected for
each skip count or level.

Require FRAME_POINTER because the stack-scanning walker cannot provide an
exact start frame.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261010132712.46931-2-kmehltretter@gmail.com
Tested-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Kconfig.debug     |  12 ++
 arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Makefile          |   1 +
 arch/riscv/kernel/tests/stacktrace_test.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 155 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/tests/stacktrace_test.c

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Kconfig.debug b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Kconfig.debug
index 40f8dafffa0a..eb79df5b2c5a 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Kconfig.debug
@@ -42,6 +42,18 @@ config RISCV_KPROBES_KUNIT
 
          If unsure, say N.
 
+config RISCV_STACKTRACE_KUNIT_TEST
+	bool "KUnit tests for RISC-V stack trace start frames"
+	depends on KUNIT && STACKTRACE && FRAME_POINTER && KALLSYMS
+	help
+	  Check that stack_trace_save() starts at its caller and skips exactly
+	  the requested number of frames through a known call chain, and that
+	  ftrace_return_address(), which CALLER_ADDR1 and up are built on,
+	  returns the caller it was asked for. This catches a stack walker
+	  that exposes its own implementation frames to its users.
+
+	  If unsure, say N.
+
 endif # RUNTIME_TESTING_MENU
 
 endmenu # "arch/riscv/kernel runtime Testing"
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Makefile
index 407e7e6c28dc..9ca4135bffb5 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Makefile
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Makefile
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
 obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_MODULE_LINKING_KUNIT)	+= module_test/
 obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_KPROBES_KUNIT)		+= kprobes/
+obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_STACKTRACE_KUNIT_TEST)	+= stacktrace_test.o
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/stacktrace_test.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/stacktrace_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..bb299a106773
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/stacktrace_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/* Check where stack_trace_save() and ftrace_return_address() start. */
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/ftrace.h>
+#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/stacktrace.h>
+
+#define RISCV_STACKTRACE_DEPTH 16
+
+static noinline unsigned int
+riscv_stacktrace_leaf(unsigned long *entries, unsigned int skip)
+{
+	unsigned int count = stack_trace_save(entries, RISCV_STACKTRACE_DEPTH, skip);
+
+	barrier();
+	return count;
+}
+
+static noinline unsigned int
+riscv_stacktrace_middle(unsigned long *entries, unsigned int skip)
+{
+	unsigned int count = riscv_stacktrace_leaf(entries, skip);
+
+	barrier();
+	return count;
+}
+
+static noinline unsigned int
+riscv_stacktrace_outer(unsigned long *entries, unsigned int skip)
+{
+	unsigned int count = riscv_stacktrace_middle(entries, skip);
+
+	barrier();
+	return count;
+}
+
+static void riscv_stacktrace_check_skip(struct kunit *test, unsigned int skip)
+{
+	static const char * const expected[] = {
+		"riscv_stacktrace_leaf",
+		"riscv_stacktrace_middle",
+		"riscv_stacktrace_outer",
+	};
+	unsigned long entries[RISCV_STACKTRACE_DEPTH];
+	char symbol[KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN];
+	unsigned int count;
+
+	count = riscv_stacktrace_outer(entries, skip);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, count, 0U);
+	sprint_symbol_no_offset(symbol, entries[0]);
+	kunit_info(test, "skip=%u first=%s count=%u\n", skip, symbol, count);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, symbol, expected[skip]);
+}
+
+static void riscv_stacktrace_skip_zero(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	riscv_stacktrace_check_skip(test, 0);
+}
+
+static void riscv_stacktrace_skip_one(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	riscv_stacktrace_check_skip(test, 1);
+}
+
+static void riscv_stacktrace_skip_two(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	riscv_stacktrace_check_skip(test, 2);
+}
+
+static noinline void *riscv_return_address_leaf(unsigned int level)
+{
+	void *addr = (void *)ftrace_return_address(level);
+
+	barrier();
+	return addr;
+}
+
+static noinline void *riscv_return_address_middle(unsigned int level)
+{
+	void *addr = riscv_return_address_leaf(level);
+
+	barrier();
+	return addr;
+}
+
+static noinline void *riscv_return_address_outer(unsigned int level)
+{
+	void *addr = riscv_return_address_middle(level);
+
+	barrier();
+	return addr;
+}
+
+/*
+ * ftrace_return_address(n) is what CALLER_ADDRn expands to. Like
+ * __builtin_return_address(n), level 0 is the caller of the function that
+ * uses it.
+ */
+static void riscv_return_address_check(struct kunit *test, unsigned int level)
+{
+	static const char * const expected[] = {
+		"riscv_return_address_middle",
+		"riscv_return_address_outer",
+	};
+	char symbol[KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN];
+	void *addr;
+
+	addr = riscv_return_address_outer(level);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, addr);
+	sprint_symbol_no_offset(symbol, (unsigned long)addr);
+	kunit_info(test, "level=%u caller=%s\n", level, symbol);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, symbol, expected[level]);
+}
+
+static void riscv_return_address_level_zero(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	riscv_return_address_check(test, 0);
+}
+
+static void riscv_return_address_level_one(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	riscv_return_address_check(test, 1);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case riscv_stacktrace_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(riscv_stacktrace_skip_zero),
+	KUNIT_CASE(riscv_stacktrace_skip_one),
+	KUNIT_CASE(riscv_stacktrace_skip_two),
+	KUNIT_CASE(riscv_return_address_level_zero),
+	KUNIT_CASE(riscv_return_address_level_one),
+	{}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite riscv_stacktrace_suite = {
+	.name = "riscv-stacktrace-skip",
+	.test_cases = riscv_stacktrace_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suite(riscv_stacktrace_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-- 
2.39.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10  1:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-14  9:26 [PATCH v6 0/7] riscv: Add reliable stack unwinding for livepatch Shuai Xue
2026-09-14  9:26 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] riscv: stacktrace: Add frame record metadata Shuai Xue
2026-09-14  9:26 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] riscv: stacktrace: disable KASAN and KCOV instrumentation for stacktrace.o Shuai Xue
2026-09-14  9:26 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] riscv: ftrace: always preserve s0 in dynamic ftrace register frame Shuai Xue
2026-09-14  9:26 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] riscv: stacktrace: introduce stack-bound tracking helpers Shuai Xue
2026-09-14  9:26 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] riscv: stacktrace: switch to frame-pointer based unwinder Shuai Xue
2026-10-09 18:59   ` Karl Mehltretter
2026-10-10  3:38     ` Shuai Xue
2026-10-13 20:18   ` Martin Kaiser
2026-10-14 13:09     ` Shuai Xue
2026-09-14  9:26 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] riscv: Kconfig: enable HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE and HAVE_LIVEPATCH Shuai Xue
2026-09-14  9:26 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] selftests/livepatch: Add RISC-V syscall wrapper prefix Shuai Xue
2026-09-29  7:28 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] riscv: Add reliable stack unwinding for livepatch Martin Kaiser
2026-10-08 11:42   ` Shuai Xue
2026-10-12  8:44     ` Martin Kaiser
2026-11-10  1:37 ` [PATCH v7 00/10] " Shuai Xue
2026-11-10  1:37   ` [PATCH v7 01/10] riscv: stacktrace: do not report the walker's own frame from arch_stack_walk() Shuai Xue
2026-11-10  1:37   ` Shuai Xue [this message]
2026-11-10  1:37   ` [PATCH v7 03/10] riscv: ftrace: use the frame pointer as the function graph return-address cookie Shuai Xue
2026-11-10  1:37   ` [PATCH v7 04/10] riscv: stacktrace: Add frame record metadata Shuai Xue
2026-11-10  1:37   ` [PATCH v7 05/10] riscv: stacktrace: disable KASAN and KCOV instrumentation for stacktrace.o Shuai Xue
2026-11-10  1:37   ` [PATCH v7 06/10] riscv: ftrace: always preserve s0 in dynamic ftrace register frame Shuai Xue
2026-11-10  1:37   ` [PATCH v7 07/10] riscv: stacktrace: introduce stack-bound tracking helpers Shuai Xue
2026-11-10  1:37   ` [PATCH v7 08/10] riscv: stacktrace: switch to frame-pointer based unwinder Shuai Xue
2026-11-10  1:37   ` [PATCH v7 09/10] riscv: Kconfig: enable HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE and HAVE_LIVEPATCH Shuai Xue
2026-11-10  1:37   ` [PATCH v7 10/10] selftests/livepatch: Add RISC-V syscall wrapper prefix Shuai Xue
2026-11-10  6:35   ` [PATCH v7 00/10] riscv: Add reliable stack unwinding for livepatch Karl Mehltretter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261110013750.36800-3-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=jkchen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=martin@kaiser.cx \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpdesouza@suse.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®