From: liamsmith827 <liamsmith827@grapheneos.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
liamsmith827 <liamsmith827@proton.me>
Subject: [PATCH net v2 0/4] ipv4: restrict on-link fallback to lookup misses
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 06:15:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261110061536.10811-1-liamsmith827@grapheneos.org> (raw)
From: liamsmith827 <liamsmith827@proton.me>
For non-vrf unicast, the on-link fallback currently occurs regardless of
the particular error returned by fib_lookup(). As a result, routes and
rules that are supposed to restrict traffic (blackhole, prohibit,
unreachable) are unable to do so comprehensively.
A specific example of this being a problem is within Android, where the
VPN "kill switch" is implemented with prohibit rules. Any process that
can set flowi4_oif (SO_BINDTODEVICE, IP_UNICAST_IF, IP_PKTINFO, etc.) is
able to utilize this fallback, meaning unprivileged Android apps can
trivially bypass the VPN. This is particularly bad on cellular networks,
where ARP is often not needed.
The first patch adds FIB_LOOKUP_REPORT_MISS. IPv4 FIB lookup maps a
routing miss to -ENETUNREACH, which is also returned when an unreachable
rule is encountered. This flag prevents the mapping, returning -ESRCH
instead.
The second patch uses this flag to restrict the fallback to routing
lookup misses for non-vrf unicast. The fallback is still always taken
for multicast, regardless of any restrictions or misses.
The third patch updates tests now that the on-link fallback has been
restricted to routing lookup misses for non-vrf unicast.
The fourth patch replaces an existing comment which describes obsolete
fib_lookup(), MSG_DONTROUTE and IPv6 behavior.
This was originally observed on an Android device, by way of packet
capture.
Tested fcnal-test.sh in UML with CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES both enabled
and disabled.
v2:
- Restrict the fallback to routing lookup misses, instead of only
honoring prohibit (-EACCES).
- Add FIB_LOOKUP_REPORT_MISS to differentiate a routing miss from an
unreachable rule.
- Split the comment update out into its own patch and remove the
signature.
- Enable all of the commented out device bind tests in
ipv4_ping_novrf(), add a route miss test and update the UDP test
expectations.
- Target net instead of net-next, add Fixes and Cc stable.
- Drop RFC.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20261019032406.88874-1-liamsmith827@grapheneos.org/
liamsmith827 (4):
ipv4: add FIB_LOOKUP_REPORT_MISS
ipv4: restrict on-link fallback to lookup misses
selftests: net: test restricted on-link fallback
ipv4: replace obsolete routing comment
include/net/fib_rules.h | 5 +++
include/net/ip_fib.h | 6 +--
net/ipv4/fib_rules.c | 2 +-
net/ipv4/route.c | 34 ++++++++--------
tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh | 47 +++++++++++++----------
5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
--
2.47.3
next reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 6:15 liamsmith827 [this message]
2026-11-10 6:15 ` [PATCH net v2 1/4] ipv4: add FIB_LOOKUP_REPORT_MISS liamsmith827
2026-11-10 6:15 ` [PATCH net v2 2/4] ipv4: restrict on-link fallback to lookup misses liamsmith827
2026-11-10 6:15 ` [PATCH net v2 3/4] selftests: net: test restricted on-link fallback liamsmith827
2026-11-10 6:15 ` [PATCH net v2 4/4] ipv4: replace obsolete routing comment liamsmith827
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261110061536.10811-1-liamsmith827@grapheneos.org \
--to=liamsmith827@grapheneos.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=liamsmith827@proton.me \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®