From: Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@linux.dev>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>,
Asim Viladi Oglu Manizada <manizada@pm.me>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] pppoe: use sk_node for session hash chains
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 17:12:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261110091255.24158-1-qingfang.deng@linux.dev> (raw)
PPPoE uses a private next pointer to chain sockets in each hash bucket.
Removing a socket requires walking the chain to find its predecessor.
Use sock.sk_node and the standard hlist helpers to allow constant-time
removal and eliminate pppox_sock.next. Cache the bucket index in sk_hash
before publishing the socket and use it to advance /proc/net/pppoe
iteration between buckets.
Signed-off-by: Qingfang Deng <qingfang.deng@linux.dev>
---
drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c | 101 +++++++++++++--------------------------
include/linux/if_pppox.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
index 67c28ac763ef..de6edc31790f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ struct pppoe_net {
* as well, moreover in case of SMP less locking
* controversy here
*/
- struct pppox_sock __rcu *hash_table[PPPOE_HASH_SIZE];
+ struct hlist_head hash_table[PPPOE_HASH_SIZE];
spinlock_t hash_lock;
};
@@ -159,15 +159,14 @@ static struct pppox_sock *__get_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, __be16 sid,
unsigned char *addr, int ifindex)
{
int hash = hash_item(sid, addr);
- struct pppox_sock *ret;
+ struct sock *sk;
+
+ sk_for_each_rcu(sk, &pn->hash_table[hash]) {
+ struct pppox_sock *ret = pppox_sk(sk);
- ret = rcu_dereference(pn->hash_table[hash]);
- while (ret) {
if (cmp_addr(&ret->pppoe_pa, sid, addr) &&
ret->pppoe_ifindex == ifindex)
return ret;
-
- ret = rcu_dereference(ret->next);
}
return NULL;
@@ -176,47 +175,22 @@ static struct pppox_sock *__get_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, __be16 sid,
static int __set_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, struct pppox_sock *po)
{
int hash = hash_item(po->pppoe_pa.sid, po->pppoe_pa.remote);
- struct pppox_sock *ret, *first;
+ struct sock *sk;
+
+ sk_for_each(sk, &pn->hash_table[hash]) {
+ struct pppox_sock *ret = pppox_sk(sk);
- first = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->hash_table[hash], lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
- ret = first;
- while (ret) {
if (cmp_2_addr(&ret->pppoe_pa, &po->pppoe_pa) &&
ret->pppoe_ifindex == po->pppoe_ifindex)
return -EALREADY;
-
- ret = rcu_dereference_protected(ret->next, lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
}
- RCU_INIT_POINTER(po->next, first);
- rcu_assign_pointer(pn->hash_table[hash], po);
+ po->sk.sk_hash = hash;
+ hlist_add_head_rcu(&po->sk.sk_node, &pn->hash_table[hash]);
return 0;
}
-static void __delete_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, const struct pppox_sock *po)
-{
- int hash = hash_item(po->pppoe_pa.sid, po->pppoe_pa.remote);
- struct pppox_sock *ret, __rcu **src;
-
- ret = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->hash_table[hash], lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
- src = &pn->hash_table[hash];
-
- while (ret) {
- if (ret == po) {
- struct pppox_sock *next;
-
- next = rcu_dereference_protected(ret->next,
- lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
- rcu_assign_pointer(*src, next);
- break;
- }
-
- src = &ret->next;
- ret = rcu_dereference_protected(ret->next, lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
- }
-}
-
/**********************************************************************
*
* Set/get/delete/rehash items
@@ -234,10 +208,10 @@ static inline struct pppox_sock *get_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, __be16 sid,
return po;
}
-static void delete_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, const struct pppox_sock *po)
+static void delete_item(struct pppoe_net *pn, struct pppox_sock *po)
{
spin_lock(&pn->hash_lock);
- __delete_item(pn, po);
+ __sk_del_node_init(&po->sk);
spin_unlock(&pn->hash_lock);
}
@@ -256,20 +230,15 @@ static void pppoe_flush_dev(struct net_device *dev)
pn = pppoe_pernet(dev_net(dev));
spin_lock(&pn->hash_lock);
for (i = 0; i < PPPOE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
- struct pppox_sock *po = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->hash_table[i],
- lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
- struct sock *sk;
-
- while (po) {
- while (po && po->pppoe_dev != dev) {
- po = rcu_dereference_protected(po->next,
- lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
- }
+ struct sock *sk = sk_head(&pn->hash_table[i]);
- if (!po)
- break;
+ while (sk) {
+ struct pppox_sock *po = pppox_sk(sk);
- sk = &po->sk;
+ if (po->pppoe_dev != dev) {
+ sk = sk_next(sk);
+ continue;
+ }
/* We always grab the socket lock, followed by the
* hash_lock, in that order. Since we should hold the
@@ -301,8 +270,7 @@ static void pppoe_flush_dev(struct net_device *dev)
BUG_ON(pppoe_pernet(dev_net(dev)) == NULL);
spin_lock(&pn->hash_lock);
- po = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->hash_table[i],
- lockdep_is_held(&pn->hash_lock));
+ sk = sk_head(&pn->hash_table[i]);
}
}
spin_unlock(&pn->hash_lock);
@@ -633,7 +601,6 @@ static int pppoe_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr_unsized *uservaddr
po->pppoe_ifindex = 0;
memset(&po->pppoe_pa, 0, sizeof(po->pppoe_pa));
memset(&po->chan, 0, sizeof(po->chan));
- po->next = NULL;
po->num = 0;
sk->sk_state = PPPOX_NONE;
@@ -970,20 +937,17 @@ static int pppoe_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
static inline struct pppox_sock *pppoe_get_idx(struct pppoe_net *pn, loff_t pos)
{
- struct pppox_sock *po;
+ struct sock *sk;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < PPPOE_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
- po = rcu_dereference(pn->hash_table[i]);
- while (po) {
+ sk_for_each_rcu(sk, &pn->hash_table[i]) {
if (!pos--)
- goto out;
- po = rcu_dereference(po->next);
+ return pppox_sk(sk);
}
}
-out:
- return po;
+ return NULL;
}
static void *pppoe_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
@@ -999,7 +963,8 @@ static void *pppoe_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
static void *pppoe_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
struct pppoe_net *pn = pppoe_pernet(seq_file_net(seq));
- struct pppox_sock *po, *next;
+ struct hlist_node *next;
+ struct pppox_sock *po;
++*pos;
if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN) {
@@ -1007,17 +972,19 @@ static void *pppoe_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
goto out;
}
po = v;
- next = rcu_dereference(po->next);
+ next = rcu_dereference(hlist_next_rcu(&po->sk.sk_node));
if (next)
- po = next;
+ po = pppox_sk(sk_entry(next));
else {
- int hash = hash_item(po->pppoe_pa.sid, po->pppoe_pa.remote);
+ unsigned int hash = po->sk.sk_hash;
po = NULL;
while (++hash < PPPOE_HASH_SIZE) {
- po = rcu_dereference(pn->hash_table[hash]);
- if (po)
+ next = rcu_dereference(hlist_first_rcu(&pn->hash_table[hash]));
+ if (next) {
+ po = pppox_sk(sk_entry(next));
break;
+ }
}
}
diff --git a/include/linux/if_pppox.h b/include/linux/if_pppox.h
index 594d6dc3f4c9..aafdf72cfd2c 100644
--- a/include/linux/if_pppox.h
+++ b/include/linux/if_pppox.h
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ struct pppox_sock {
/* struct sock must be the first member of pppox_sock */
struct sock sk;
struct ppp_channel chan;
- struct pppox_sock __rcu *next; /* for hash table */
union {
struct pppoe_opt pppoe;
struct pptp_opt pptp;
--
2.43.0
reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261110091255.24158-1-qingfang.deng@linux.dev \
--to=qingfang.deng@linux.dev \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=ericwouds@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manizada@pm.me \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®